Dynamic Minimax Probability Machine-Based Approach for Fault Diagnosis Using Pairwise Discriminate Analysis

Fault diagnosis plays a key role in the safe and efficient operation of industrial processes. With the emerging big data era, the analytic methods based on probabilistic representations have attracted growing research interest. In this brief, a dynamic minimax probability machine (DMPM) approach based on the framework of probabilistic representations is proposed for diagnosing process faults, without imposing any assumptions on data distributions. In addition, an information criterion is put forward to determine the optimal dimensionality reduction order and time lags of DMPM. The proposed DMPM-based method allows for the enhanced performance of fault diagnosis due to the following advantages over conventional diagnostic approaches. First, DMPM maximizes the pairwise separation probability between each pair of faulty data sets, directly yielding improved discriminatory power in the projected space. Second, the proposed approach is less likely to be influenced by “outlier” classes since its objective function is a summation of probabilities, thereby enabling it to be beneficial for the classification of imbalanced data. Third, DMPM has superior capability on capturing dynamic information from the process data by augmenting observation vectors with time lags. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated on the Tennessee Eastman process.

[1]  Zhihuan Song,et al.  Autoregressive Dynamic Latent Variable Models for Process Monitoring , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Review on Basic Data-Driven Approaches for Industrial Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Subramanian Ramanathan,et al.  Multitask Linear Discriminant Analysis for View Invariant Action Recognition , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Dexian Huang,et al.  Canonical variate analysis-based contributions for fault identification , 2015 .

[5]  Katharine Armstrong,et al.  Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think , 2014 .

[6]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  A combined canonical variate analysis and Fisher discriminant analysis (CVA-FDA) approach for fault diagnosis , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part I: Fault Diagnosis With Model-Based and Signal-Based Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Arthur K. Kordon,et al.  Fault diagnosis based on Fisher discriminant analysis and support vector machines , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[9]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple and unknown faults using the causal map and multivariate statistics , 2015 .

[10]  Stefanos Zafeiriou,et al.  Principal Component Analysis With Complex Kernel: The Widely Linear Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[11]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .

[12]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  A New Method of Dynamic Latent-Variable Modeling for Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Paul Honeine,et al.  Online Kernel Principal Component Analysis: A Reduced-Order Model , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Statistical process monitoring and disturbance diagnosis in multivariable continuous processes , 1996 .

[15]  Qunxiong Zhu,et al.  Pairwise discriminate analysis based minimax probability machine (PDA-MPM) approach for fault diagnosis , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA).

[16]  Leo H. Chiang,et al.  Fault diagnosis in chemical processes using Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and principal component analysis , 2000 .

[17]  Tommy W. S. Chow,et al.  Motor Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Trace Ratio Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[18]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Geometric properties of partial least squares for process monitoring , 2010, Autom..

[19]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  A Class of Single-Class Minimax Probability Machines for Novelty Detection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[20]  Ping Zhang,et al.  A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process , 2012 .

[21]  Yuli Zhang,et al.  Dimension Reduction by Minimum Error Minimax Probability Machine , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[22]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[23]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  Maximizing sensitivity in medical diagnosis using biased minimax probability Machine , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Si-Zhao Joe Qin,et al.  Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[25]  Q. Peter He,et al.  A New Fault Diagnosis Method Using Fault Directions in Fisher Discriminant Analysis , 2005 .

[26]  Kimberly A. Dukes Gram–Schmidt Process† , 2014 .

[27]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem , 1995 .

[28]  D. Bertsimas,et al.  Moment Problems and Semidefinite Optimization , 2000 .

[29]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  A Robust Minimax Approach to Classification , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[30]  M. Barker,et al.  Partial least squares for discrimination , 2003 .

[31]  Kush R. Varshney Generalization Error of Linear Discriminant Analysis in Spatially-Correlated Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  石井 恵一 On sharpness of Tchebycheff-type inequalities = チェビシェフ型不等式の最良性について , 1964 .