Assessment of knee cartilage in cadavers with dual-detector spiral CT arthrography and MR imaging.

PURPOSE To assess dual-detector spiral CT arthrography in the evaluation of the entire knee cartilage obtained from cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two independent observers characterized articular cartilage in 12 cadaver knees in which MR imaging and dual-detector spiral CT arthrography were performed and compared their findings to those found during macroscopic assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging and spiral CT arthrography for detecting grade 2A or higher and grade 2B or higher cartilage lesions, the Spearman correlation coefficient between arthrographic and macroscopic grading, and kappa statistics for assessing interobserver reproducibility were determined. RESULTS At spiral CT arthrography, sensitivities and specificities ranged between 80% and 88% for the detection of grade 2A or higher cartilage lesions and ranged between 85% and 94% for the detection of grade 2B or higher cartilage lesions. At MR imaging, sensitivities and specificities ranged between 78% and 86% and between 76% and 91% for the detection of grade 2A or higher and grade 2B or higher cartilage lesions, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients between spiral CT arthrography or MR imaging and macroscopic grading of articular surfaces were 0.797 and 0.702, respectively. CONCLUSION Dual-detector spiral CT arthrography of the knee is a valuable method for the assessment of open cartilage lesions of the entire knee.

[1]  F. Handelberg,et al.  Chondral lesions of the patella evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy. , 1990, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  A. Dwyer,et al.  Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  G. Meachim,et al.  Morphological patterns of articular cartilage fibrillation , 1975, The Journal of pathology.

[4]  L. Frank,et al.  Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low-field-strength extremity-only magnet: comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard. , 1998, Radiology.

[5]  L R Frank,et al.  Short echo time projection reconstruction MR imaging of cartilage: comparison with fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS and magnetization transfer contrast MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  G. Wang,et al.  Stair-step artifacts in three-dimensional helical CT: an experimental study. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  B. Maldague,et al.  Dual-detector spiral CT arthrography of the knee: accuracy for detection of meniscal abnormalities and unstable meniscal tears. , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  F. Noyes,et al.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  D G Disler,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage. , 1998, Skeletal radiology.

[10]  S Sone,et al.  Hyaline cartilage: in vivo and in vitro assessment with magnetization transfer imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Postcontrast MR Arthrography in Assessment of Cartilage Lesions , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  R A Kruger,et al.  Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  H. Imhof,et al.  Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  D W Piraino,et al.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. , 1996, Radiology.

[15]  J Laubenberger,et al.  Comparison of MR sequences in quantifying in vitro cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  V. Chandnani,et al.  Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  W. F. Conway,et al.  Cross-sectional imaging of the patellofemoral joint and surrounding structures. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  T. Rand,et al.  Analysis of patellar cartilage: Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers , 2000, Acta radiologica.

[19]  J. K. Smith,et al.  Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. , 1998, Radiology.

[20]  D Resnick,et al.  Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution. , 1991, Radiology.

[21]  H K Genant,et al.  Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  B. Daenen,et al.  Evaluation of patellar cartilage surface lesions: comparison of CT arthrography and fat-suppressed FLASH 3D MR imaging , 1998, European Radiology.

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: an in vitro study , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[25]  H Ihara,et al.  Double-contrast CT arthrography of the cartilage of the patellofemoral joint. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  A. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of correlated correlations. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  H. Boeck,et al.  The value of computed tomography scanning in chondromalacia patellae , 1982, Skeletal Radiology.

[30]  J. Szumowski,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: fat-suppressed MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[31]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Thickness of patellofemoral articular cartilage as measured on MR imaging: sequence comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation , 1995, Skeletal Radiology.

[33]  H. Potter,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage in the Knee. An Evaluation with Use of Fast-Spin-Echo Imaging* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  K W McEnery,et al.  Helical CT: principles and technical considerations. , 1994, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[35]  J. Hodler,et al.  Current status of imaging of articular cartilage , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.