Positive Effects of Rewards and Performance Standards on Intrinsic Motivation

The present study examined how rewards affect people’s intrinsic motivation when the rewards are tied to meeting increasingly demanding performance standards. The experiment was a 2 x 2 factorial design with 2 levels of performance standard (constant, progressive) and 2 levels of reward (reward, no reward). Using a puzzle-solving task, 60 undergraduate university students were randomly assigned to the experimental conditions. In the constant conditions, participants were required to solve 3 puzzle problems on each of 3 trials; in the progressive conditions, participants were asked to solve 1, 3, and 5 problems over the trials. Half the participants were offered and given $1.00 for each correct solution; those in the no-reward condition were not offered pay. The major finding was that participants in the progressive reward condition spent more time on the task in a free-choice session than those in the other conditions. The findings are discussed in terms of different theoretical accounts of rewards and intrinsic motivation and are most consistent with an extension of Eisenberger’s (1992) theory of learned industriousness.

[1]  J. Cameron,et al.  Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[2]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[3]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Linda Rhoades,et al.  Does Pay for Performance Increase or Decrease Perceived Self-Determination and Intrinsic Motivation? , 1999 .

[5]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. , 1973 .

[6]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth? , 1996, The American psychologist.

[7]  Diane G. Symbaluk,et al.  Social Modeling, Monetary Incentives, and Pain Endurance: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Pam Perception , 1997 .

[8]  Carol Sansone,et al.  Rewarding pinball wizardry: Effects of evaluation and cue value on intrinsic interest , 1984 .

[9]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[10]  C. Sansone,et al.  Rewarding competence: The importance of goals in the study of intrinsic motivation. , 2000 .

[11]  R. Eisenberger Learned industriousness. , 1992, Psychological review.

[12]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Rewards: A Commentary on Cameron and Pierce’s Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[13]  D. Schunk Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Achievement Through Rewards and Goals: Motivational and Informational Effects , 1984 .

[14]  J. Cameron,et al.  Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Resolving the Controversy , 2002 .

[15]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[16]  W D Pierce,et al.  Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues , 2001, The Behavior analyst.

[17]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Reward contingencies and the development of children's skills and self-efficacy. , 1983 .

[18]  Effects of Extrinsic Reinforcement for Reading During Childhood on Reported Reading Habits of College Students , 1999 .

[19]  W D Pierce,et al.  Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation--negative, neutral and positive: comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999) , 1999, Psychological bulletin.