A Prioritization Scheme for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy

A seismic rehabilitation program is being implemented to address the vulnerability of a large proportion of Italian building stock. A risk-management framework, initially only for Italian school buildings, has been developed to assign priorities for the rehabilitation, and to give timescales within which retrofit or demolition must take place. Since it is not practical to carry out detailed assessment for around 60,000 Italian schools, the framework is a multiple-level procedure that aims to identify the highest-risk buildings based on filters of increasing detail, and reduces the size of the building inventory at each step. Finally, priorities and timescales are assigned based on vulnerability, seismic hazard, and building occupancy, within a general framework with parameters that must be assigned by the relevant authorities. The methodology is transparent, technically based, and flexible enough to be adapted for other building types or regions.

[1]  G. Magenes,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR THE SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[2]  R. C. KANDEL,et al.  INVESTING IN FUTURE GENERATION : THE SCHOOL EARTHQUAKE SAFETY PROGRAM OF NEPAL , 2002 .

[3]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A Probabilistic Displacement-based Vulnerability Assessment Procedure for Earthquake Loss Estimation , 2004 .

[4]  Daniel QUIUN,et al.  REPAIR AND SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN PERU , 2002 .

[5]  Ezio Faccioli,et al.  Treatment of ground-motion predictive relationships for the reference seismic hazard map of Italy , 2005 .

[6]  Sandra MIRANDA,et al.  SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN TOLUCA CITY , 1999 .

[7]  R. Sharpe Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings , 1994 .

[8]  V. Petrini,et al.  Censimento di vulnerabilità degli edifici pubblici, strategici e speciali nelle regioni Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Molise, Puglia e Sicilia – Cap. 4: Risultati del Progetto , 1999 .

[9]  A. Dixit,et al.  THE KATHMANDU VALLEY EARTHQUAKE RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT : AN EVALUATION , 1999 .

[10]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The impact of epistemic uncertainty on an earthquake loss model , 2005 .

[11]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Defining Priorities and Timescales for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy , 2006 .

[12]  Agostino Goretti,et al.  Building Inspection and Damage Data for the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake , 2004 .

[13]  Liu Jie-ping,et al.  Elementary Introduction to Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance , 2006 .

[14]  David Hattis,et al.  Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation of School Buildings (K-12). , 2002 .

[15]  Jorge MENESES-LOJA,et al.  SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN LIMA , PERU , 2002 .