BMC Public Health BioMed Central Research article Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban

BackgroundWe quantified the air quality benefits of a smoke-free workplace law in Boston Massachusetts, U.S.A., by measuring air pollution from secondhand smoke (SHS) in 7 pubs before and after the law, comparing actual ventilation practices to engineering society (ASHRAE) recommendations, and assessing SHS levels using health and comfort indices.MethodsWe performed real-time measurements of respirable particle (RSP) air pollution and particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAH), in 7 pubs and outdoors in a model-based design yielding air exchange rates for RSP removal. We also assessed ventilation rates from carbon dioxide concentrations. We compared RSP air pollution to the federal Air Quality Index (AQI) and the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) to assess health risks, and assessed odor and irritation levels using published SHS-RSP thresholds.ResultsPre-smoking-ban RSP levels in 6 pubs (one pub with a non-SHS air quality problem was excluded) averaged 179 μg/m3, 23 times higher than post-ban levels, which averaged 7.7 μg/m3, exceeding the NAAQS for fine particle pollution (PM2.5) by nearly 4-fold. Pre-smoking ban levels of fine particle air pollution in all 7 of the pubs were in the Unhealthy to Hazardous range of the AQI. In the same 6 pubs, pre-ban indoor carcinogenic PPAH averaged 61.7 ng/m3, nearly 10 times higher than post-ban levels of 6.32 ng/m3. Post-ban particulate air pollution levels were in the Good AQI range, except for 1 venue with a defective gas-fired deep-fat fryer, while post-ban carcinogen levels in all 7 pubs were lower than outdoors.ConclusionDuring smoking, although pub ventilation rates per occupant were within ASHRAE design parameters for the control of carbon dioxide levels for the number of occupants present, they failed to control SHS carcinogens or RSP. Nonsmokers' SHS odor and irritation sensory thresholds were massively exceeded. Post-ban air pollution measurements showed 90% to 95% reductions in PPAH and RSP respectively, differing little from outdoor concentrations. Ventilation failed to control SHS, leading to increased risk of the diseases of air pollution for nonsmoking workers and patrons. Boston's smoking ban eliminated this risk.

[1]  H. Kesteloot,et al.  Environmental tobacco smoke. Measuring exposures and assessing health effects : by B. Hulka (Ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986 337 pp. [pound sign]19.20 , 1987 .

[2]  J. Ware.  Particulate air pollution and mortality--clearing the air. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  James L. Repace,et al.  Respirable Particles and Carcinogens in the Air of Delaware Hospitality Venues Before and After a Smoking Ban , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  James L. Repace,et al.  Indoor Air Quality in Hospitality Venues Before and After Implementation of a Clean Indoor Air Law , 2004 .

[5]  B. Danuser,et al.  Acute sensory responses of nonsmokers at very low environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in controlled laboratory settings. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  S. Glantz,et al.  Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. , 1991, Circulation.

[7]  S. A. Richter,et al.  Cancer risk management A review of 132 federal regulatory decisions. , 1987, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  James L. Repace,et al.  Secondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and air nicotine levels in bars , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[9]  James L. Repace,et al.  Air Nicotine and Saliva Cotinine as Indicators of Workplace Passive Smoking Exposure and Risk 1 , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  S. T. Taylor,et al.  HVAC systems and equipment , 1990 .

[11]  James L. Repace,et al.  Indoor air quality in hospitality venues before and after implementation of a clean indoor air law--Western New York, 2003. , 2004, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[12]  Michigan.,et al.  Toxicological profile for dichloropropenes , 2008 .

[13]  Anna M. Fan,et al.  Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment , 2005 .

[14]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  Kenneth P Moritsugu,et al.  The 2006 Report of the Surgeon General: the health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  D. Dockery,et al.  Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Influence of traffic patterns on particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in Roxbury, Massachusetts , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[18]  D. Spodick,et al.  Passive smoking and heart disease. , 1991, Circulation.

[19]  C. Aring,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1939, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.

[20]  James L. Repace,et al.  Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health. , 1980, Science.

[21]  Shelly Puleo.  US Environmental Protection Agency , 1982 .

[22]  L. Wallace,et al.  Indoor particles: a review. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[23]  L. Biener,et al.  Smoky bars and restaurants: who avoids them and why? , 1999, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[24]  Refrigerating.  ASHRAE handbook and product directory /published by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc , 1977 .

[25]  D. Hoffmann,et al.  Significance of exposure to sidestream tobacco smoke. , 1987, IARC scientific publications.

[26]  R M Nester,et al.  Occupational Safety & Health Administration , 1996, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[27]  L. Biener,et al.  Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: population based trend analysis , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  M. Plummer,et al.  International agency for research on cancer. , 2020, Archives of pathology.

[29]  L. Pederson,et al.  Prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults and changes in prevalence of current and some day smoking--United States, 1996-2001. , 2003, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[30]  A. Weber,et al.  Acute effects of environmental tobacco smoke. , 1984, European journal of respiratory diseases. Supplement.

[31]  M. Mahoney,et al.  Early evidence on the effectiveness of clean indoor air legislation in New York State. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[32]  W R Ott,et al.  Mathematical models for predicting indoor air quality from smoking activity. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  Paul Switzer,et al.  Particle Concentrations Inside a Tavern Before and After Prohibition of Smoking: Evaluating the Performance of an Indoor Air Quality Model. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  M. van Tongeren,et al.  Levels of second hand smoke in pubs and bars by deprivation and food-serving status: a cross-sectional study from North West England , 2006, BMC public health.