Optimizing Learning Cost-Effectively Using Technology.

Abstract : The present paper reports a methodology and supporting tool for optimizing the use of multimedia technology to support training. Our goal is to support recent efforts to move training from schoolhouses to technology to save money and make training more readily available to sailors. Because technology development represents a huge investment, formal methods are needed for optimizing resources to meet training needs cost effectively. This includes supporting tradeoff analyses when sufficient resources are not available for the preferred technology option. We identified two Navy training technology scenarios. The first is developing technology for new training requirements. The second is converting lecture-based courses to technology-based. Accordingly, our project focused on both. First, we developed a methodology for selecting media to meet training requirements. This was supplemented by methods for projecting costs and benefits for selected media. Second, we developed a tool to estimate costs associated with course conversion. In order to be responsive to Navy needs, we established a relationship with the Chief, Naval Education and Training (CNET). Their most pressing need was course conversion. Therefore we tested our tool on a CNET-supplied course using their costing data. The results of the tool's analyses matched CNET's own.

[1]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[2]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[3]  Diane M. Billings,et al.  Effects of learning style preferences, attitude and GPA on learner achievement using computer assisted interactive videodisc instruction , 1992 .

[4]  Karen Swan Honing in on the Target: Who Among the Educationally Disadvantaged Benefits Most From What CBI? , 1990 .

[5]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Social-Cognitive Interactions, Motivation, and Cognitive Growth in Logo Programming and CAI Problem-Solving Environments , 1990 .

[6]  D. Clements Enhancement of Creativity in Computer Environments , 1991 .

[7]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Joseph String,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instruction in Military Training , 1979 .

[9]  Michael E. Skinner,et al.  The effects of computer-based instruction on the achievement of college students as a function of achievement status and mode of presentation , 1990 .

[10]  Russell T. Osguthorpe,et al.  The Effects of Computerized Picture-Word Processing on Kindergartners' Language Development , 1990 .

[11]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Comparative Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction: A Synthesis of Reviews , 1987 .

[12]  Rachelle S. Heller,et al.  Multimedia in public access settings: evaluation issues , 1995 .

[13]  Ronald D. Owston Effects of Word Processing on Student Writing in a High Computer Access Environment. Technical Report 91-3. , 1991 .

[14]  Terry Hoffer,et al.  Qualitative/quantitative study of the effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive video instruction: the hyperiodic table of elements , 1992 .

[15]  Reuven Lazarowitz,et al.  Science Process Skills of 10th-Grade Biology Students in a Computer-Assisted Learning Setting , 1993 .

[16]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[17]  John B. Black,et al.  Knowledge Structures , 1986 .

[18]  David W. Dalton The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video , 1990 .

[19]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  The effects of an interactive dissection simulation on the performance and achievement of high school biology students , 1993 .

[20]  Charles Funkhouser The Influence of Problem Solving Software on Student Attitudes about Mathematics , 1993 .

[21]  John Leddo,et al.  Distributed Interactive Intelligent Tutoring Simulation , 1997 .

[22]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[23]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[24]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Learning with hypertext learning environments: theory, design, and research , 1995 .

[25]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Multimedia applications for education and training: revolution or red herring? , 1995, CSUR.

[26]  Alice W. Ryan Meta-Analysis of Achievement Effects of Microcomputer Applications in Elementary Schools , 1991 .

[27]  J. D. Fletcher Effectiveness and Cost of Interactive Videodisc Instruction in Defense Training and Education , 1990 .

[28]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based education in colleges , 1986 .

[29]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[30]  Simon Hooper Effects of Peer Interaction during Computer-Based Mathematics Instruction. , 1992 .

[31]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .

[32]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[33]  Robertta H. Barba,et al.  The effects of embedding generative cognitive strategies in science software , 1990 .

[34]  Barbara J. McNeil,et al.  Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10 year review of achievement effects. , 1991 .

[35]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Adult Education: A Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[36]  Yong-Chil Yang,et al.  The Effects of Media on Motivation and Content Recall: Comparison of Computer- and Print-Based Instruction , 1991 .

[37]  Thomas M. Welsh Simplifying hypermedia usage for learners: the effect of visual and manual filtering capabilities on efficiency, perceptions of usability, and performance , 1995 .