Coexistence and interference tests on a Bluetooth Low Energy front-end

Over the last decade, impelled by the industry demand to achieve a technology capable of sending low amount of data payloads, but at the same time with a very low latency and ultra-low power consumption, several efforts in wireless network transmission standardization emerged, supporting new applications in health, sports and fitness, medical, sensor networking, and even the automotive industry field. Despite the competition from ANT+, ZigBee, Nike+, NFC and RF4CE, in 2010 the Bluetooth SIG (special interest groups) adopted a new wireless technology named Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). BLE coexist with Bluetooth in the same chip (called dual mode) therefore assuring this technology a rapid growth among smartphones, iOS, tablets, laptops and PCs. In fact, Bluetooth SIG also announced that it shall be hard to find a smartphone or tablet-PC that does not integrate BLE in the near future. Despite this accelerated growth, BLE shares the same band with Wi-Fi and all other low power technologies, so in order to achieve QoS, a mandatory requirement in many systems, tests for interference and coexistence must be performed. This study analysis the impact of a BLE sensor network on a crowded 2.4GHz room, with multiple Wi-Fi routers, ZigBee sensors and Bluetooth technology. We also compare the results with the ones obtained inside an anechoic chamber on similar experiences.

[1]  Kyung Sup Kwak,et al.  An overview of IEEE 802.15.6 standard , 2010, 2010 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL 2010).

[2]  Wook Hyun Kwon,et al.  Packet Error Rate Analysis of ZigBee Under WLAN and Bluetooth Interferences , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  안병철,et al.  Wireless Body Area Networks의 관련기술과 연구경향에 대한 이해 , 2014 .

[4]  Paulo Mendes,et al.  A platform with combined environmental and physiological wireless data acquisition for AAL applications , 2010 .

[5]  A. Sikora,et al.  Coexistence of IEEE802.15.4 with other Systems in the 2.4 GHz-ISM-Band , 2005, 2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[6]  E. Johannessen,et al.  Glucose Monitoring System based on Osmotic Pressure Measurements , 2011 .

[7]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Jordi Casademont,et al.  Forwarding Techniques for IP Fragmented Packets in a Real 6LoWPAN Network , 2011, Sensors.

[9]  P. Barsocchi,et al.  Wireless Body Area Networks , 2014 .

[10]  Yigal Bitran,et al.  Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) and Bluetooth coexistence: issues and solutions , 2004, 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8754).

[11]  M. O. Al-Nuaimi,et al.  Time-Variant Radio Channel Characterization and Modelling of Vegetation Media at Millimeter-Wave Frequency , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  Salviano Soares,et al.  Radiation tests on a bluetooth based front-end electronic device towards a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring sensor , 2013, 2013 Science and Information Conference.

[13]  Edgar H. Callaway,et al.  Wireless Sensor Networks: Architectures and Protocols , 2003 .