Understanding the role of nano-topography on the surface of a bone-implant.

Bone-implant material development is proceeding at a high pace, and has shifted from straightforward biomaterial testing to more advanced cell-targeted approaches for surface modification and design. It has been long known that cells can recognize and respond to topographical features by changing their morphology and behavior. The progress in surface analytical devices, as well as in techniques for production of topographical features on the nanometer scale allow for the characterization of natural tissues and the reproduction of biomimetic nanofeatures in material surfaces. In this review some of the most common surface-characterization and surface-manufacturing techniques will be addressed and results from in vitro and in vivo studies will be presented. Knowledge on biomaterial nanotopography can be exploited for active stimulation and control of cellular behavior like attachment, migration, spreading, gene expression, proliferation, differentiation and secretion of matrix components.

[1]  Montes-Morán,et al.  Zeta Potential as a Tool to Characterize Plasma Oxidation of Carbon Fibers , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Biological Responses to Materials , 2001 .

[3]  David F. Williams The relationship between biomaterials and nanotechnology. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[4]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[5]  A F von Recum,et al.  Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[6]  Michael Olbrich,et al.  Proliferation of aligned mammalian cells on laser-nanostructured polystyrene. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[7]  T. Peltola,et al.  Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response. , 2008, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[8]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[9]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[10]  E. Ivanova,et al.  Roughness parameters for standard description of surface nanoarchitecture. , 2012, Scanning.

[11]  T. Ogawa,et al.  Ti Nano-nodular Structuring for Bone Integration and Regeneration , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[12]  Takeo Suzuki,et al.  Microtopography of titanium suppresses osteoblastic differentiation but enhances chondroblastic differentiation of rat femoral periosteum-derived cells. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nature designs tough collagen: Explaining the nanostructure of collagen fibrils , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Y. Yang,et al.  Anodic oxidized nanotubular titanium implants enhance bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivery. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  Joshua C. Hansen,et al.  Effect of surface nanoscale topography on elastic modulus of individual osteoblastic cells as determined by atomic force microscopy. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Brånemark,et al.  Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[17]  Michael D. Ball,et al.  The effect of different surface morphology and roughness on osteoblast-like cells. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[18]  A. Nanci,et al.  Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  J. Jansen,et al.  The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[20]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  Chitosan bicomponent nanofibers and nanoporous fibers. , 2006, Carbohydrate research.

[22]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[23]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Medical Contraindications to Implant Therapy: Part I: Absolute Contraindications , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[24]  B. Ratner Replacing and renewing: synthetic materials, biomimetics, and tissue engineering in implant dentistry. , 2001, Journal of dental education.

[25]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Genetic Responses to Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implants , 2011, Journal of dental research.

[26]  C. D. W. Wilkinson,et al.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[27]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[28]  Kazuo Takeuchi,et al.  Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[29]  Doron Steinberg,et al.  Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.

[31]  K. V. Sreekanth,et al.  Interferometric lithography for nanoscale feature patterning: a comparative analysis between laser interference, evanescent wave interference, and surface plasmon interference. , 2010, Applied optics.

[32]  Y. Kato,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of chemotactic factors for bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. , 2007, Stem cells and development.

[33]  S. Gerecht,et al.  Enhancement of In Vitro Capillary Tube Formation by Substrate Nanotopography , 2008, Advanced materials.

[34]  Hongyi Li,et al.  Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[35]  L. Addadi,et al.  Effects of surface microtopography on the assembly of the osteoclast resorption apparatus , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  J. Jansen,et al.  The effect of electrospun fibre alignment on the behaviour of rat periodontal ligament cells. , 2010, European cells & materials.

[37]  T. Webster,et al.  Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[38]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[39]  D. F. Williams,et al.  The Williams dictionary of biomaterials , 1999 .

[40]  Duncan S Sutherland,et al.  In vitro and in vivo response to nanotopographically-modified surfaces of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and polycaprolactone , 2006, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[41]  Jun Hu,et al.  Influence of physicochemical properties of laser-modified polystyrene on bovine serum albumin adsorption and rat C6 glioma cell behavior. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[42]  Koichi Matsuo,et al.  Osteoclast-osteoblast communication. , 2008, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[43]  R. Brånemark,et al.  Acute inflammatory response to laser-induced micro- and nano-sized titanium surface features. , 2013, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[44]  T. Groth,et al.  The role of surface zeta potential and substratum chemistry for regulation of dermal fibroblasts interaction , 2003 .

[45]  J. Davies,et al.  The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[46]  Christophe Vieu,et al.  Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications , 2000 .

[47]  J. Jansen,et al.  Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[48]  K. Leong,et al.  Effects of nanoimprinted patterns in tissue-culture polystyrene on cell behavior. , 2005, Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society.

[49]  J. Jansen,et al.  Dynamic cell adhesion and migration on nanoscale grooved substrates. , 2012, European cells & materials.

[50]  T. Webster,et al.  The effect of biphasic electrical stimulation on osteoblast function at anodized nanotubular titanium surfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[51]  Claude Martelet,et al.  Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour , 2003 .

[52]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[53]  N. Burnham,et al.  The role of few-asperity contacts in adhesion. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[54]  M. Foss,et al.  Bovine serum albumin adsorption on nano-rough platinum surfaces studied by QCM-D. , 2008, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[55]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Cell motility and mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[56]  Antonio Nanci,et al.  Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[57]  Silvia Mittler,et al.  Migration of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on Nanometric Topographical Patterns: Influence of Filopodia and Focal Adhesions on Contact Guidance , 2010, PloS one.

[58]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[59]  M. Stamm Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces , 2008 .

[60]  W. Chiou,et al.  Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[61]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[62]  Lars Rasmusson,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[63]  J. Jansen,et al.  Cell and tissue behavior on micro-grooved surfaces , 2001, Odontology.

[64]  Max Born,et al.  Principles of optics - electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (7. ed.) , 1999 .

[65]  V. Russo,et al.  Titanium oxide nanostructured films by reactive pulsed laser deposition , 2009 .

[66]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[67]  O. Harrysson,et al.  Higher Cumulative Revision Rate of Knee Arthroplasties in Younger Patients with Osteoarthritis , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[68]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[69]  Ulrich Dahmen,et al.  Atomic-resolution imaging with a sub-50-pm electron probe. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[70]  Mark Bates,et al.  Multicolor Super-Resolution Imaging with Photo-Switchable Fluorescent Probes , 2007, Science.

[71]  Julie Gold,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[72]  F. Cui,et al.  Hierarchically biomimetic bone scaffold materials: nano-HA/collagen/PLA composite. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[73]  Matthew John Dalby,et al.  Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[74]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Ceramic/polymer nanocomposites with tunable drug delivery capability at specific disease sites. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[75]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[76]  B. Espehaug,et al.  A clinical and radiographic 13-year follow-up study of 138 Charnley hip arthroplasties in patients 50–70 years old: Comparison of university hospital data and registry data , 2008, Acta orthopaedica.

[77]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Patterning colloidal nanotopographies , 2002 .

[78]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[79]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Protein immobilisation on micro/nanostructures fabricated by laser microablation. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[80]  Sergio Paduano,et al.  Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[81]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[82]  M. Wood Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[83]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[84]  Keesung Kim,et al.  Direct differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into selective neurons on nanoscale ridge/groove pattern arrays. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[85]  Pekka Pulkkinen,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[86]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Self-Assembly at All Scales , 2002, Science.

[87]  Craig A. Grimes,et al.  Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation , 2001 .

[88]  A. Curtis,et al.  Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[89]  Juin-Yih Lai,et al.  Quantitative analysis of osteoblast-like cells (MG63) morphology on nanogrooved substrata with various groove and ridge dimensions. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[90]  U. Hempel,et al.  Response of human bone marrow stromal cells, MG-63, and SaOS-2 to titanium-based dental implant surfaces with different topography and surface energy. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[91]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[92]  K. Jandt,et al.  Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[93]  Joshua C. Hansen,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on poly(L-lactic acid)/polystyrene demixed thin film blends: effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry, and wettability. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[94]  R G Harrison,et al.  ON THE STEREOTROPISM OF EMBRYONIC CELLS. , 1911, Science.

[95]  Tejal A. Desai,et al.  Methods for Fabrication of Nanoscale Topography for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[96]  Regina Luttge,et al.  The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[97]  C. Kasper,et al.  Stem cell differentiation depending on different surfaces. , 2012, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[98]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[99]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[100]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[101]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies , 2007, International journal of nanomedicine.

[102]  V. N. Petryakov,et al.  Ordered nanostructures written directly by laser interference , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[103]  L. Sennerby,et al.  [Direct bone anchorage of oral implants: clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration]. , 1990, Parodontologie.

[104]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[105]  A. Curtis,et al.  Human Fibroblast and Human Bone Marrow Cell Response to Lithographically Nanopatterned Adhesive Domains on Protein Rejecting Substrates , 2007, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[106]  Nadine Geyer,et al.  Three-beam interference lithography: upgrading a Lloyd's interferometer for single-exposure hexagonal patterning. , 2009, Optics letters.

[107]  A. F. Recum,et al.  The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants , 1996 .

[108]  Marc Aucouturier,et al.  Structure and physicochemistry of anodic oxide films on titanium and TA6V alloy , 1999 .

[109]  B. Nebe,et al.  Atmospheric plasma enhances wettability and cell spreading on dental implant metals. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[110]  Flemming Besenbacher,et al.  Fibronectin adsorption on tantalum: the influence of nanoroughness. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[111]  J. Ong,et al.  Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[112]  Shu Chien,et al.  Role of Surface Electric Charge in Red Blood Cell Interactions , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[113]  R. Marchant,et al.  Atomic force microscopy for characterization of the biomaterial interface. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[114]  Y. Ishii,et al.  PDGF Receptor β Is a Potent Regulator of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Function , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[115]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[116]  E. Jones,et al.  The role of mesenchymal stem cells in maintenance and repair of bone. , 2007, Injury.

[117]  A. Osbourn,et al.  Capillary-induced contact guidance. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[118]  R. Brånemark,et al.  Bone–titanium oxide interface in humans revealed by transmission electron microscopy and electron tomography , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[119]  T. Webster,et al.  Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[120]  S. Boxer,et al.  Phase Separation of Lipid Membranes Analyzed with High-Resolution Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry , 2006, Science.

[121]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Soft tissue response to titanium dioxide nanotube modified implants. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[122]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[123]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. , 2010, European cells & materials.

[124]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[125]  J. Davies,et al.  Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[126]  S. Perren,et al.  Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits. , 1994, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[127]  Joshua D Salvi,et al.  Increased mechanosensitivity of cells cultured on nanotopographies. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[128]  R G Richards,et al.  Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S‐phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[129]  J. Lauritsen,et al.  Atomic resolution non-contact atomic force microscopy of clean metal oxide surfaces , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[130]  F. Cui,et al.  Culture of neural cells on silicon wafers with nano-scale surface topograph , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[131]  V. Zhdanov,et al.  Enhancement of protein adsorption induced by surface roughness. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[132]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[133]  X. Jiang,et al.  In vitro behavior of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast with different annealing temperature titania nanotubes. , 2010, Oral diseases.

[134]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Dental endosseous implants in the medically compromised patient. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[135]  S. Hell,et al.  Subdiffraction resolution in far-field fluorescence microscopy. , 1999, Optics letters.

[136]  E. G. van Putten,et al.  Scattering lens resolves sub-100 nm structures with visible light. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[137]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms. A nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36,984 patients. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[138]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[139]  Benjamin M. Wu,et al.  Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[140]  P. Kingshott,et al.  The recognition of adsorbed and denatured proteins of different topographies by beta2 integrins and effects on leukocyte adhesion and activation. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[141]  Craig A. Grimes,et al.  A review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Fabrication, material properties, and solar energy applications , 2006 .

[142]  H. Butt,et al.  Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications , 2005 .

[143]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[144]  P. Reichart,et al.  Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[145]  P WEISS,et al.  Experiments on cell and axon orientation in vitro; the role of colloidal exudates in tissue organization. , 1945, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[146]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[147]  James Runt,et al.  Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[148]  F Rupp,et al.  Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[149]  Rickard Brånemark,et al.  Biomechanical, histological, and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium alloy implants: a study in rabbit. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[150]  A. Curtis,et al.  CONTROL OF CELL BEHAVIOR: TOPOLOGICAL FACTORS. , 1964, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[151]  G. Thakur,et al.  Surface Analysis of Indigenous Stainless Steel Miniplates Used in Facial Fractures , 2010, Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery.

[152]  K. Venkatakrishnan,et al.  Synthesis of bio-functionalized three-dimensional titania nanofibrous structures using femtosecond laser ablation. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[153]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Control of nanoparticle film structure for colloidal lithography , 2003 .

[154]  Yusuke Arima,et al.  Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[155]  J. Vasiliev,et al.  Behaviour of fibroblast-like cells on grooved surfaces. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[156]  P. Somasundaran,et al.  Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: effects on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[157]  D. Basu,et al.  In vivo bone response and interfacial properties of titanium-alloy implant with different designs in rabbit model with time. , 2011, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[158]  Javad Parvizi,et al.  Total hip arthroplasties: What are the reasons for revision? , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[159]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[160]  T. Webster,et al.  Increased chondrocyte adhesion on nanotubular anodized titanium. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[161]  F. Deng,et al.  Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[162]  G. E. Marshall,et al.  Interactions of human blood and tissue cell types with 95-nm-high nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[163]  J. Heath,et al.  A new hypothesis of contact guidance in tissue cells. , 1976, Experimental cell research.