Pushing the Limits of Design Fiction: The Case For Fictional Research Papers

This paper considers how design fictions in the form of 'imaginary abstracts' can be extended into complete 'fictional papers'. Imaginary abstracts are a type of design fiction that are usually included within the content of 'real' research papers, they comprise brief accounts of fictional problem frames, prototypes, user studies and findings. Design fiction abstracts have been proposed as a means to move beyond solutionism to explore the potential societal value and consequences of new HCI concepts. In this paper we contrast the properties of imaginary abstracts, with the properties of a published paper that presents fictional research, Game of Drones. Extending the notion of imaginary abstracts so that rather than including fictional abstracts within a 'non-fiction' research paper, Game of Drones is fiction from start to finish (except for the concluding paragraph where the fictional nature of the paper is revealed). In this paper we review the scope of design fiction in HCI research before contrasting the properties of imaginary abstracts with the properties of our example fictional research paper. We argue that there are clear merits and weaknesses to both approaches, but when used tactfully and carefully fictional research papers may further empower HCI's burgeoning design discourse with compelling new methods.

[1]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  A pragmatics framework for design fiction , 2016 .

[2]  Eva Knutz,et al.  The poetics of design fiction , 2013, DPPI.

[3]  L. Christensen,et al.  Deception in Psychological Research , 1988 .

[4]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  From user to character: an investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios , 2002, DIS '02.

[5]  Paul Atkinson.  Delete: A Design History of Computer Vapourware , 2013 .

[6]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[7]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  Modelling design fiction:what’s the story? , 2014 .

[8]  Ben Kirman,et al.  Fifty shades of CHI: the perverse and humiliating human-computer relationship , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  A machine learning: an example of HCI prototyping with design fiction , 2014, NordiCHI.

[10]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  Game of Drones , 2015, CHI PLAY.

[11]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[12]  Elizabeth A. Buie,et al.  Chatbots of the gods: imaginary abstracts for techno-spirituality research , 2014, NordiCHI.

[13]  Derek Hales,et al.  Design fictions an introduction and provisional taxonomy , 2013, Digit. Creativity.

[14]  Alexis Hope,et al.  Sensory Fiction: A Design Fiction of Emotional Computation , 2014, ImmersiveMe '14.

[15]  E. Goode,et al.  The ethics of deception in social research: A case study , 1996 .

[16]  James Auger,et al.  Speculative design: crafting the speculation , 2013, Digit. Creativity.

[17]  Paul Dourish,et al.  “Resistance is futile”: reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Rikard Lindell.  Crafting interaction: The epistemology of modern programming , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[19]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction , 2015, BCS HCI.

[20]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[21]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts , 2014, CHI.

[22]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Invisible design: exploring insights and ideas through ambiguous film scenarios , 2012, DIS '12.

[23]  Hannah Drayson.  Delete: A Design History of Computer Vapourware , 2016, Leonardo.

[24]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  The ideology of the future in design fictions , 2013, Digit. Creativity.

[25]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging , 2015, CHI.

[26]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Solutionism, the Game , 2015 .

[27]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don't Exist by E. Morozov, ed., , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[28]  Simon Grand,et al.  Design Fiction: A Method Toolbox for Design Research in a Complex World , 2010 .

[29]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[31]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions , 2000 .

[32]  Ben Kirman,et al.  CHI and the future robot enslavement of humankind: a retrospective , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Tom Feltwell,et al.  Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs , 2015, CHI.

[34]  Mark Blythe.  Research through design fiction , 2014 .

[35]  C. DiSalvo,et al.  FCJ-142 Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures , 2012 .

[36]  Stuart Reeves,et al.  Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  Eva Knutz,et al.  The Role of Fiction in Experiments within Design, Art & Architecture , 2013 .

[38]  Tracee Vetting Wolf,et al.  Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI , 2006, CHI.

[39]  William W. Gaver.  What should we expect from research through design? , 2012, CHI.

[40]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .