Composable Mission Spaces and M&S Repositories - Applicability of Open Standards

The challenge of generating a federation driven by operational requirements "on the fly" has been formulated in various programs and proposals, but so far, no satisfying solution has been accomplished. The use of open source doesn't satisfy the industry, which has a vital interest to keep their core solutions in-house (protection of intellectual property). The use of interface-driven solutions based on black boxes leads to discrepancies and inconsistent federations. The use of open standards to connect components and escorting reference models - allowing a white box view on the components functionality and their interior and exterior interrelations without revealing the implementation details - will fulfill the industry requirement for privacy as well as the user requirement for the necessary transparency required for V&V and credibility of the federated solution. Using an improved version of the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM), various open standards will be evaluated concerning their contribution to respective levels. Based on this finding, a possible implementation will be proposed showing how the various open standards can complement each other resulting in an M&S repository comprising heterogeneous solutions that can be federated into a composable mission space driven by the users requirements. Furthermore it will be argued, that aligning these standards within DoD is possible, and this will help to terminate the shortcomings of interface driven solutions and to integrate components delivering M&S functionality into real world systems, in particular for Command and Control.

[1]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations , 2004 .

[2]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  JSB composability and web services interoperability via extensible modeling and simulation framework (XMSF) and model driven architecture (MDA) , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Shirley Browne,et al.  Reuse Library Interoperability and The World Wide Web , 1997, Proceedings of the (19th) International Conference on Software Engineering.

[4]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Modeling and Simulation Integration with Network-Centric Command and Control Architectures , 2003 .

[5]  Slimane Hammoudi,et al.  Web Services in the Context of MDA , 2003, ICWS.

[6]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  JSB Composability and Web Services Interoperability Via Extensible Modeling & Simulation Framework (XMSF), Model Driven Architecture (MDA), Component Repositories, and Web-based Visualization , 2003 .

[7]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model , 2003 .

[8]  Donna W Blake,et al.  The Navy's Probability of Raid Annihilation Assessment Process. Standards & Architecture and Systems Engineering Concept Model , 2006 .

[9]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Ideas for a Common Framework for Military M&S and C3I Systems , 2003 .

[10]  Eric Newcomer,et al.  Understanding Web Services: XML, WSDL, SOAP, and UDDI , 2002 .

[11]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Discrete event system specification (devs) distributed object computing (doc) modeling and simulation , 2000 .

[12]  B. Esfandiari,et al.  On the Management of Compositions of Web Services , 2001 .

[13]  Tony Andrews Business Process Execution Language for Web Services Version 1.1 , 2003 .