Collaboration and Memory: Effects of Dyadic Retrieval on Different Memory Tasks

Collaborative retrieval was investigated in two experiments. The experiments were explicitly designed to investigate how different types of memory tasks were affected by two individuals working together compared to individuals working on their own. A nominal group score was treated as the predicted potential a dyad could attain. In Experiment 1, semantic and episodic retrieval were employed. The episodic task was to encode and retrieve a story and the semantic task was to answer, without any encoding, 20 questions from the same history domain as the episodic task. In Experiment 2, explicit recognition and implicit retrieval of dot patterns were employed. The explicit recognition task was forced-choice, and in the implicit task, subjects were instructed to complete a pattern they saw from an incomplete pattern. The results suggest that: (1) dyads suffer from collaboration relative to the predicted potential, (2) the reduction of productivity for dyads was limited to explicit and episodic memory tasks, and (3) friends as opposed to non-friends reduced the negative effect of collaboration. The results replicate and extend the results from a previous study.

[1]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[2]  Elizabeth Weldon,et al.  Cognitive Loafing , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Social influences on remembering: Intellectual, interpersonal and intergroup components , 1991 .

[4]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. , 1982 .

[5]  J. Sachs.  Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse , 1967 .

[6]  W L FAUST,et al.  Group versus individual problem-solving. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[8]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[9]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[10]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[11]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  The Effects of Dyadic Discussion on Earwitness Recall , 1992 .

[12]  A Treisman,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for visual patterns. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  S. Corkin,et al.  Intact priming of patterns despite impaired memory , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[15]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .

[16]  Herbert Solomon,et al.  Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems , 1955 .

[17]  W. Moede,et al.  Die Richtlinien der Leistungs-psychologie. , 2022 .

[18]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[19]  Ursula Casanova,et al.  Are two heads are better than one? , 1988 .

[20]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  Loss of Semantic Memory: Implications for the Modularity of Mind , 1994 .

[21]  G. Stephenson,et al.  Partners in recall: Collaborative order in the recall of a police interrogation , 1986 .

[22]  Graham J. Hitch,et al.  Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. , 1992 .

[23]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[24]  E. Tulving.  Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[25]  E. Tulving.  How many memory systems are there , 1985 .

[26]  G. Stephenson,et al.  Social remembering: Quantitative aspects individual and collaborative remembering police officers and students , 1990 .

[27]  N. Kerr,et al.  Ringelmann Revisited , 1981 .