Immunoglobulin G Avidity in Diagnosis of Toxoplasmic Lymphadenopathy and Ocular Toxoplasmosis

ABSTRACT Traditional serological techniques have some limitations in evaluating the duration of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women, patients with lymphadenopathy, and older children suspected of having congenital toxoplasmosis. In these three groups of patients, two variants of T. gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) avidity tests were used: an EIA Kit (Labsystems) and a noncommercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specially elaborated in the laboratory. The avidity of specific IgG in sera from 23 patients with a known recently acquired infection (mainly pregnant women) was low (less than 30%), whereas that in sera from 19 patients with toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy of 3 weeks to 6 months in duration (mean, 8.3 weeks) covered a large range (between 0.2 and 57.8%; mean, 25.7%); high avidity results were observed for 10 of 19 patients (52.6%). The large range of IgG avidity in patients with toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy suggests various durations of infection in these patients, with a tendency for a chronic phase of toxoplasmosis. According to the avidity marker, five patients with lymphadenopathy for less than 3 months did not have a recent Toxoplasma infection. In 6 of 19 patients with lymphadenopathy (31.6%), low IgG avidity values persisted until 5 months after the first serological examination. In all four patients with a documented chronic course of Toxoplasma infection (6 months to 8 years after the first positive serology), high IgG avidity values were observed. Among sera from 10 children and young immunocompetent adults suspected of having ocular reactivation of congenital toxoplasmosis, all had high IgG avidity values (over 40%), suggesting congenitally acquired ocular infection rather than noncongenital infection. In conclusion, the avidity of IgG is a valuable marker of recent toxoplasmosis in pregnant women, suggests the duration of invasion in patients with lymphadenopathy, and may be helpful for differentiation between reactivation of congenital infection and recently acquired ocular toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients. A low IgG avidity does not always identify a recent case of toxoplasmosis, but a high IgG avidity can exclude primary infections of less than 5 months’ duration.

[1]  B. Stray-Pedersen,et al.  Improved diagnosis of primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in early pregnancy by determination of antitoxoplasma immunoglobulin G avidity , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  M. Bost,et al.  Diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis by immunoblotting and relationship with other methods , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  J. Montoya,et al.  Studies on the serodiagnosis of toxoplasmic lymphadenitis. , 1995, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  R. Holliman,et al.  The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis using IgG avidity , 1994, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  M. Lappalainen,et al.  Avidity of IgG in serodiagnosis of infectious diseases , 1993 .

[6]  V. Hiilesmaa,et al.  Toxoplasmosis acquired during pregnancy: improved serodiagnosis based on avidity of IgG. , 1993, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  B. Lécolier,et al.  [Value of the study of IgG avidity for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis]. , 1993, Pathologie-biologie.

[8]  B. Lecolier Toxoplasmose au cours de la grossesse. , 1993 .

[9]  P. Ambroise‐Thomas,et al.  [Evaluation of the Vidas system for the serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis]. , 1993, Annales de biologie clinique.

[10]  A. Berrebi,et al.  IgA antibody response during acquired and congenital toxoplasmosis. , 1992, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  D. Vinatier,et al.  Anti‐P30 IgA antibodies as prenatal markers of congenital toxoplasma infection , 1992, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[12]  R. A. Payne,et al.  Potential role of IgG avidity for diagnosing toxoplasmosis. , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  A. Bonhomme,et al.  Detection of specific immunoglobulin E in patients with toxoplasmosis , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  M. Contreras,et al.  Antibody avidity test for recent infection with hepatitis C virus , 1990, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Pakuła,et al.  Kryteria kliniczne i ocena obrazu oraz przebiegu toksoplazmozy węzłowej , 1990 .

[16]  W. Kocięcka,et al.  [Clinical criteria and evaluation of the pathology and progress of lympho-nodular toxoplasmosis]. , 1990, Wiadomosci parazytologiczne.

[17]  O. Mäkelä,et al.  Recent primary toxoplasma infection indicated by a low avidity of specific IgG. , 1989, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  H. Thomas,et al.  SEROLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY RUBELLA AND REINFECTION , 1988, The Lancet.

[19]  K. Hedman,et al.  RUBELLA INFECTION AND REINFECTION DISTINGUISHED BY AVIDITY OF IgG , 1988, The Lancet.

[20]  F. Derouin,et al.  Sequential determination of IgG subclasses and IgA specific antibodies in primary and reactivating toxoplasmosis. , 1987, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[21]  J. Couvreur,et al.  Toxoplasmose oculaire: traitement préventif et curatif , 1985 .

[22]  S. Inouye,et al.  Changes in antibody avidity after virus infections: detection by an immunosorbent assay in which a mild protein-denaturing agent is employed , 1984, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[23]  J. François [Congenital ocular toxoplasmosis and late recurrences (author's transl)]. , 1981, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[24]  P. Ambroise‐Thomas,et al.  [Improvement of the immunofluorescence technic by the use of counter-dyes. Application to toxoplasmas]. , 1966, La Presse medicale.