Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richness with spatially explicit models

The causes of global variation in species richness have been debated for nearly two centuries with no clear resolution in sight. Competing hypotheses have typically been evaluated with correlative models that do not explicitly incorporate the mechanisms responsible for biotic diversity gradients. Here, we employ a fundamentally different approach that uses spatially explicit Monte Carlo models of the placement of cohesive geographical ranges in an environmentally heterogeneous landscape. These models predict species richness of endemic South American birds (2248 species) measured at a continental scale. We demonstrate that the principal single-factor and composite (species-energy, water-energy and temperature-kinetics) models proposed thus far fail to predict (r2⩽0.05) the richness of species with small to moderately large geographical ranges (first three range-size quartiles). These species constitute the bulk of the avifauna and are primary targets for conservation. Climate-driven models performed reasonably well only for species with the largest geographical ranges (fourth quartile) when range cohesion was enforced. Our analyses suggest that present models inadequately explain the extraordinary diversity of avian species in the montane tropics, the most species-rich region on Earth. Our findings imply that correlative climatic models substantially underestimate the importance of historical factors and small-scale niche-driven assembly processes in shaping contemporary species-richness patterns.

[1]  M. Palmer,et al.  Variation in species richness: Towards a unification of hypotheses , 1994, Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica.

[2]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2007 .

[3]  Thiago F. Rangel,et al.  Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography , 2006 .

[4]  James H. Brown,et al.  Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic divergence and speciation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Barthlott,et al.  The significance of geographic range size for spatial diversity patterns in Neotropical palms , 2006 .

[6]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect: There’s a Baby in the Bathwater , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[7]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Neutral community dynamics, the mid‐domain effect and spatial patterns in species richness , 2005 .

[8]  N. Gotelli,et al.  ALLOMETRIC EXPONENTS SUPPORT A 3/4-POWER SCALING LAW , 2005 .

[9]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Phylogeny can make the mid-domain effect an inappropriate null model , 2005, Biology Letters.

[10]  G. Graves,et al.  Source pool geometry and the assembly of continental avifaunas , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Sean R Connolly,et al.  Process‐Based Models of Species Distributions and the Mid‐Domain Effect , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[12]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  An evolutionary tolerance model explaining spatial patterns in species richness under environmental gradients and geometric constraints , 2005 .

[13]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF BAND SUM AREA, DOMAIN EXTENT, AND RANGE SIZES ON THE LATITUDINAL MID-DOMAIN EFFECT , 2005 .

[14]  C. Rahbek The role of spatial scale and the perception of large‐scale species‐richness patterns , 2004 .

[15]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centres of endemism , 2004 .

[16]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[18]  T. Kitzberger,et al.  Environmental correlates of mammal species richness in South America: effects of spatial structure, taxonomy and geographic range , 2004 .

[19]  M. Tognelli,et al.  Analysis of determinants of mammalian species richness in South America using spatial autoregressive models , 2004 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[21]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[22]  James H. Brown,et al.  Domains of Diversity , 2004, Science.

[23]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect and Species Richness Patterns:What Have We Learned So Far? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[24]  R. Ricklefs A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity , 2004 .

[25]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[26]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[27]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  LATITUDINAL GRADIENTS OF BIODIVERSITY:Pattern,Process,Scale,and Synthesis , 2003 .

[28]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness , 2003 .

[29]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[30]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2003 .

[31]  Michael S. Rosenberg,et al.  Conceptual and Mathematical Relationships among Methods for Spatial Analysis , 2022 .

[32]  James H. Brown,et al.  Global Biodiversity, Biochemical Kinetics, and the Energetic-Equivalence Rule , 2002, Science.

[33]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geographic Range Size and Determinants of Avian Species Richness , 2002, Science.

[34]  T. Simons,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology , 2002 .

[35]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Species Diversity--Scale Matters , 2002, Science.

[36]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[37]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geometric constraints explain much of the species richness pattern in African birds , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  G. Graves,et al.  Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  G. Graves,et al.  Detection of macro-ecological patterns in South American hummingbirds is affected by spatial scale , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  V. Sánchez‐Cordero,et al.  Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time , 1999, Science.

[41]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[42]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Energy availability and habitat heterogeneity predict global riverine fish diversity , 1998, Nature.

[43]  M. M.,et al.  Species – Area Curves based on Geographic Range and Occupancy , 1997 .

[44]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Evaluation of simple statistical criteria to qualify a simulation , 1996 .

[45]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model , 1995 .

[46]  J. Fjeldså,et al.  Geographical patterns of neoendemic and older relict species of Andean forest birds: the significance of ecologically stable areas. , 1995 .

[47]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[48]  P. Clifford,et al.  Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes , 1993 .

[49]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Assembly of avian mixed-species flocks in Amazonia. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[51]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[52]  D. Currie Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[53]  R. Haining Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences , 1990 .

[54]  G. Graves Linearity of Geographic Range and Its Possible Effect on the Population Structure of Andean Birds , 1988 .

[55]  G. Graves Elevational correlates of speciation and intraspecific geographic variation in plumage in Andean forest birds , 1985 .

[56]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Ecology versus History as Determinants of Patchy and Insular Distributions in High Andean Birds , 1980 .

[57]  J. Haffer Speciation in amazonian forest birds. , 1969, Science.