Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle

Three multilevel multidisciplinary optimization techniques, Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis, Collaborative Optimization, and Modified Collaborative Optimization, are applied to the design of a reusable launch vehicle, evaluated, and compared in this study. In addition to comparing the techniques against each other, they are also compared with designs reached via fixed-point iteration of disciplines with local optimization and the industry accepted multidisciplinary optimization technique, All-at-Once. The new multidisciplinary optimization techniques, particularly Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis, showed greater ability than fixed-point iteration to design for a global objective and were more applicable to complex systems than All-at-Once. This study was the first time that the novel multidisciplinary optimization methods were compared qualitatively and quantitatively under controlled experimentation practices. It is still impossible to statistically determine whether any one of the novel multidisciplinary optimization techniques is better than another, because more studies using different test problems corroborating the conclusions made here are needed.

[1]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  Analytical and Computational Properties of Distributed Approaches to MDO , 2000 .

[2]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Comparative properties of collaborative optimization and other approaches to MDO , 1999 .

[3]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Bilevel Integrated System Synthesis for Concurrent and Distributed Processing , 2002 .

[4]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST). Volume 2: Utilization manual , 1975 .

[5]  Yuan Charles,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO), Part II , 2000 .

[6]  John R. Olds,et al.  SCORES: Web-Based Rocket Propulsion Analysis for Space Transportation System Design , 1999 .

[7]  I. A. Budianto,et al.  A collaborative optimization approach to design and deployment of a space based infrared system constellation , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[8]  Anthony J. Hayter,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists , 1996 .

[9]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Approaches for Aircraft Conceptual D esign , 2004 .

[10]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists , 1978 .

[11]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design , 1999 .

[12]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative Optimization: Status and Directions , 2000 .

[13]  Roger A. Lepsch,et al.  Characterization of Subsystems for a WB-003 Single Stage Shuttle , 2002 .

[14]  Jaroslaw,et al.  AIAA 2002-5409 Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) for Concurrent and Distributed Processing , 2022 .

[15]  Angel-Victor DeMiguel,et al.  An analysis of collaborative optimization methods , 2000 .

[16]  Jeremy S. Agte,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1998 .

[17]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques , 1987 .

[18]  Andrew Scott,et al.  Comparison of Collaborative Optimization to Conventional Design Techniques for a Conceptual RLV , 2000 .