Inverse identification of continuously distributed loads using strain data

Abstract Operational load and stress data are useful for structural integrity management and damage prognosis of aerospace systems. Identifying aerodynamic loads by monitoring strain is not easy because the loads are distributed continuously over the structureʼs surface. In this study, we propose a flexible method for interpolating a continuous load distribution in order to identify the full-field aerodynamic load from strain data acquired at a number of discrete points. Our method uses the conventional finite element method and pseudo-inverse matrix, and we further extend it by coupling with an aerodynamical equation. Numerical simulations show that this extension improves the estimation accuracy when only a limited amount of strain data is available. The effects of measurement error are also discussed. It is concluded that the rank reduction method improves the estimation accuracy and that use of a proper aerodynamical restriction can suppress the adverse effect of measurement error.

[1]  Alexander Tessler,et al.  A Variational Principle for Reconstruction of Elastic Deformations in Shear Deformable Plates and Shells , 2003 .

[2]  B. Aktepe,et al.  Review of fatigue monitoring of agile military aircraft , 2000 .

[3]  Kazuro Kageyama,et al.  Distributed Measurements with a Long Gauge FBG Sensor Using Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry (1st Report, System Investigation Using Optical Simulation Model) , 2006 .

[4]  D. Schnur,et al.  Finite element solution of two‐dimensional inverse elastic problems using spatial smoothing , 1990 .

[5]  Alexander Tessler,et al.  An Inverse Interpolation Method Utilizing In-Flight Strain Measurements for Determining Loads and Structural Response of Aerospace Vehicles , 2001 .

[6]  Yasushi Mitsui,et al.  APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO LOAD IDENTIFICATION , 1998 .

[7]  C. C. Quach,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using High-Density Fiber Optic Strain Sensor and Inverse Finite Element Methods , 2005 .

[8]  Kazuro Kageyama,et al.  Measurements of strain distributions with a long gauge FBG sensor using optical frequency domain reflectometry , 2005, International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors.

[9]  Charles R Farrar,et al.  Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[11]  Kim Stelson,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Some Inverse Elasticity Problems , 1989 .

[12]  Pavel M. Trivailo,et al.  The inverse determination of aerodynamic loading from structural response data using neural networks , 2006 .

[13]  Nicholas Zabaras,et al.  Investigation of regularization parameters and error estimating in inverse elasticity problems , 1994 .

[14]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  Distributed Measurements with a Long Gauge FBG Sensor Using Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry , 2008 .

[15]  Tae W. Lim,et al.  Strain-based shape estimation algorithms for a cantilever beam , 1997, Smart Structures.

[16]  Cameron W. Coates,et al.  Inverse Method Using Finite Strain Measurements to Determine Flight Load Distribution Functions , 2008 .