A Quantitative Analytical Framework for Photon Transfer Curve-Based Preflight Characterization of the Indian Remote Sensing Imaging Systems

Preflight performance characterization of spaceborne imaging systems offers high-quality images for scientific applications. A key challenge in the laboratory characterization process is to identify the candidate signal chains requiring performance optimization. For the Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) imaging systems, light transfer characterization has been identified as a standard process for performance characterization. Photon transfer curve (PTC) is another powerful and widely used tool to characterize the imaging systems in terms of camera gain ( $e^{-}$ /DN), read noise ( $e^{-}$ ), charge-to-voltage conversion factor (CVF), signal-to-noise ratio, mean–variance linearity, and so on. There have been no detailed investigations on the PTC characteristics of the IRS imaging systems. We present here PTC-based characterization studies on two high-resolution IRS imaging systems, namely, Cartosat-1 and Cartosat-2. For this, a quantitative analytical framework has been developed, which enables comparative studies among multiple signal chains by applying various statistical measures on the PTC derived parameters. This framework provides not only a quantitative assessment of performance deviations but also enables performance traceability up to detector level. Taken together, our analysis shows that all the signal chains have well behaved PTC characteristics, and performance deviations are less than 10%. In particular, performance traceability is established by the close match of the system-level CVF values within the detector manufacturer’s specified range. Studies on the adequacy of linear approximation of the PTC curve reveal large residual errors in the lower dynamic range due to an increase in read noise floor. The analytical framework developed here can significantly help optimize future IRS imaging systems.

[1]  Mustafa Din Subari,et al.  Preflight radiometric calibration of RazakSAT™ , 2009, 2009 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies.

[2]  S.E. Bohndiek,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Conversion Gain of CMOS Active Pixel Sensors , 2008 .

[3]  E. Fossum,et al.  Determination of the conversion gain and the accuracy of its measurement for detector elements and arrays. , 1996, Applied optics.

[4]  Cyril Cavadore,et al.  Fast Conversion Factor (Gain) Measurement of a CCD Using Images With Vertical Gradient , 2006 .

[5]  A. S. Kiran Kumar,et al.  Remote Sensing Data Acquisition, Platforms and Sensor Requirements , 1996 .

[6]  Joseph L. Awange,et al.  Fundamentals of Remote Sensing , 2004, Environmental Geoinformatics.

[7]  Sean Maguire,et al.  Hybrid approach to mean-variance and photon transfer measurement , 2015, Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging.

[8]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Pre-flight radiometric and spectral calibration of Resourcesat-2A-LISS3* payload , 2016, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[9]  Xiaoxiong Xiong,et al.  An overview of MODIS radiometric calibration and characterization , 2006 .

[10]  Xiaoxiong Xiong,et al.  Prelaunch Radiometric Characterization and Calibration of the S-NPP VIIRS Sensor , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  George Joseph Building Earth Observation Cameras , 2015 .

[12]  Herbert Jahn,et al.  Method for determining the electron number in charge-coupled measurement devices , 1992 .

[13]  Michael J. DeWeert,et al.  Photon transfer methods and results for electron multiplication CCDs , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[14]  Philip N. Slater,et al.  Calibration of Space-Multispectral Imaging Sensors , 1999 .

[15]  P. Radhadevi,et al.  POTENTIAL OF HIGH-RESOLUTION INDIAN REMOTE SENSING SATELLITE IMAGERY FOR LARGE SCALE MAPPING , 2009 .

[16]  Peter Sinclaire,et al.  CCD riddle: a) signal vs time: linear; b) signal vs variance: non-linear , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.