Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.

This study tests whether the detrimental effects of strong diversity faultlines on team performance can be counteracted by combining 2 managerial strategies: task role crosscutting and superordinate goals. We conducted a 2 (crosscut vs. aligned roles) × 2 (superordinate vs. subgroup goals) experimental study. Seventy-two 4-person teams with faultlines stemming from gender and educational major performed a complex decision-making task. The results show that teams with crosscut roles perform better when they are assigned a superordinate goal than a subgroup goal, whereas teams with aligned roles are not affected by goal manipulations. This effect is mediated by elaboration of task-relevant information. Implications for theory and management of team faultlines are discussed.

[1]  N. Miller,et al.  A dual-route model of crossed categorisation effects , 2003 .

[2]  D. Hambrick,et al.  FACTIONAL GROUPS: A NEW VANTAGE ON DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINES, CONFLICT, AND DISINTEGRATION IN WORK TEAMS , 2005 .

[3]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. , 1978 .

[4]  B. Bettencourt,et al.  Cooperative Interaction and Intergroup Bias: Effects of Numerical Representation and Cross-Cut Role Assignment , 1998 .

[5]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[6]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Eric Molleman,et al.  The Effects of Diversity Faultlines and Team Task Autonomy on Decision Quality and Social Integration , 2007 .

[8]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[10]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[11]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[12]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[13]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[14]  B. Bettencourt,et al.  Numerical representation and cross-cut role assignments: Majority members’ responses under cooperative interaction , 2007 .

[15]  M. Turner.  GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[16]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[17]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Majority and minority influence : source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny , 1994 .

[18]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[19]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups , 2001 .

[20]  T. Pettigrew.  Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[22]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. , 2004 .

[23]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Team diversity and information use , 2005 .

[24]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[25]  Norman Miller,et al.  Cross‐cutting category membership with role assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias , 1993 .

[26]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines , 2005 .

[27]  T. Kochan,et al.  Workplace Innovation and Labor Policy Leadership A Challenge to Business, Labor, and Government , 2009 .

[28]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation , 1991 .

[30]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance , 1986 .

[31]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Superordinate goals and intergroup conflict , 1983 .

[32]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[33]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Common ingroups and complex identities: Routes to reducing bias in multiple category contexts. , 2010 .

[34]  Jessica Mesmer-Magnus,et al.  Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis , 2012 .

[35]  M. Mumford,et al.  Taxonomic Efforts in the Description of Leadership Behavior: A General Approach , 1986 .

[36]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  Virginia S. Y. Kwan,et al.  The crossed-categorization hypothesis: Evidence of reductions in the strength of categorization, but not intergroup bias , 2004 .

[38]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[39]  B. Mullen,et al.  The effects of crossed categorization on intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis , 1998 .

[40]  M. Sherif.  Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  J. Hull,et al.  Moderator Variables in Personality Research: The Problem of Controlling for Plausible Alternatives , 1992 .

[42]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.

[43]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[44]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Mark A. Clark,et al.  Resolving meaning: Interpretation in diverse decision-making groups. , 2000 .

[46]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[47]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: elements of intergroup cooperation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model , 2000 .

[49]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[50]  N. Ellemers,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS , 2006 .

[51]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[52]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[53]  M. Brewer,et al.  Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  E. Salas,et al.  Task Cues, Dominance Cues, and Influence in Task Groups , 1993 .

[55]  P. Burke,et al.  Contemporary Social Psychological Theories , 2006 .

[56]  David Dryden Henningsen,et al.  Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts , 2003 .

[57]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[58]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators , 2008 .

[59]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[60]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes , 2010 .

[61]  N. Miller,et al.  The Effects of Crossed Categorizations in Intergroup Interaction , 2010 .

[62]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Intergroup Similarity and Subgroup Relations: Some Implications for Assimilation , 2000 .

[63]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Subgroup differentiation as a response to an overly‐inclusive group: a test of optimal distinctiveness theory , 1999 .

[64]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[65]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis,et al.  Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: is activation the key? , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance , 2003 .

[67]  Charles Perrow,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF GOALS IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS , 1961 .

[68]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  W DreudeC.K.,et al.  Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups , 2007 .

[70]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[71]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  S. Karau,et al.  Social Identity Complexity and Outgroup Tolerance , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[73]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social Identity, Organizations, and Leadership , 2001 .

[74]  M. Brewer.  The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[75]  E. Berscheid.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1976 .

[76]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social Identity Complexity , 2002 .

[77]  R. Crisp.  The psychology of social and cultural diversity , 2010 .

[78]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[79]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect , 1990 .

[80]  Arjaan Wit,et al.  The effect of social categorization on cooperation in three types of social dilemmas. , 1992 .

[81]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  The challenge of leading on unstable ground: Triggers that activate social identity faultlines , 2009 .

[82]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Crossed Categorization in Common Ingroup Contexts , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[83]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[84]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations , 2000 .

[85]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[86]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[87]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .