Modeling the in vitro 20S proteasome activity: the effect of PA28-alphabeta and of the sequence and length of polypeptides on the degradation kinetics.

Proteasomes are fundamental for the degradation of intracellular proteins, having a key role in several important metabolic and signaling pathways, in the cell cycle and in antigen presentation. In vitro proteasomal digestion assays are widely used in molecular biology and immunology. We developed a model, ProteaMAlg (proteasome modeling algorithm) that describes the kinetics of specific protein fragments generated by 20S proteasomes in different conditions, once the substrate cleavage strengths are provided. ProteaMAlg was tested on a variety of data available in the literature as well as on new degradation experiments performed with polypeptides of different sequences and lengths. The comparison between in vitro and in silico experiments was used to quantify the effect on degradation of the sequence and the length of target polypeptides, of the presence of regulatory molecules such as PA28-alphabeta, and of the type of 20S proteasome (constitutive- or immunoproteasome). The model showed that the effect of the PA28 regulatory subunit results in a modification of the gating functions of the proteasome core particle. Immunoproteasome digestion experiments suggested that this form of proteasome, which is involved in generating MHC-class I epitopes, presents modified cleavage and gating activities. Our analysis improves the current understanding of the kinetics of proteasome functioning, and provides a tool to quantify and predict the effect of key parameters during in vitro digestion. ProteaMAlg is publicly available on the web (http://www.proteamalg.com).

[1]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[2]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The Sizes of Peptides Generated from Protein by Mammalian 26 and 20 S Proteasomes , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Hermann-Georg Holzhütter,et al.  Assessment of proteasomal cleavage probabilities from kinetic analysis of time-dependent product formation. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  S. Brunak,et al.  Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[5]  P. Kloetzel,et al.  Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage,TAP transport and MHC class I binding , 2005, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[6]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  Coordinated Dual Cleavages Induced by the Proteasome Regulator PA28 Lead to Dominant MHC Ligands , 1996, Cell.

[7]  P. Kloetzel,et al.  Ubiquitin and proteasomes: Antigen processing by the proteasome , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: a destructive combination. , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  R. Huber,et al.  Substrate access and processing by the 20S proteasome core particle. , 2003, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[10]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  The Proteasome: Paradigm of a Self-Compartmentalizing Protease , 1998, Cell.

[11]  F. Luciani,et al.  A mathematical model of protein degradation by the proteasome. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[12]  J. Kurths,et al.  INFLUENCE OF TRANSPORT RATES ON THE PROTEIN DEGRADATION BY PROTEASOMES , 2006 .

[13]  W. Baumeister,et al.  20S Proteasomes Have the Potential to Keep Substrates in Store for Continual Degradation* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  P. Kloetzel Generation of major histocompatibility complex class I antigens: functional interplay between proteasomes and TPPII , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[15]  Soyeon Park,et al.  Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[16]  P. Kloetzel,et al.  A structural model of 20S immunoproteasomes: effect of LMP2 codon 60 polymorphism on expression, activity, intracellular localisation and insight into the regulatory mechanisms , 2006, Biological chemistry.

[17]  Elke Krüger,et al.  Interferon‐γ, the functional plasticity of the ubiquitin–proteasome system, and MHC class I antigen processing , 2005, Immunological reviews.

[18]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Proteasome-mediated protein processing by bidirectional degradation initiated from an internal site , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  K. Hadeler,et al.  PAProC: a prediction algorithm for proteasomal cleavages available on the WWW , 2001, Immunogenetics.

[20]  P. Kloetzel,et al.  A kinetic model of vertebrate 20S proteasome accounting for the generation of major proteolytic fragments from oligomeric peptide substrates. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[21]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. , 1999, Annual review of immunology.

[22]  W Baumeister,et al.  Decelerated degradation of short peptides by the 20S proteasome , 1998, FEBS letters.

[23]  T. Poeschel,et al.  Peptide-size–dependent active transport in the proteasome , 2003 .

[24]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Existence of a molecular ruler in proteasomes suggested by analysis of degradation products , 1994, FEBS letters.