Rayleigh-Maximum-Likelihood Filtering for Speckle Reduction of Ultrasound Images

Speckle is a multiplicative noise that degrades ultrasound images. Recent advancements in ultrasound instrumentation and portable ultrasound devices necessitate the need for more robust despeckling techniques, for both routine clinical practice and teleconsultation. Methods previously proposed for speckle reduction suffer from two major limitations: 1) noise attenuation is not sufficient, especially in the smooth and background areas; 2) existing methods do not sufficiently preserve or enhance edges-they only inhibit smoothing near edges. In this paper, we propose a novel technique that is capable of reducing the speckle more effectively than previous methods and jointly enhancing the edge information, rather than just inhibiting smoothing. The proposed method utilizes the Rayleigh distribution to model the speckle and adopts the robust maximum-likelihood estimation approach. The resulting estimator is statistically analyzed through first and second moment derivations. A tuning parameter that naturally evolves in the estimation equation is analyzed, and an adaptive method utilizing the instantaneous coefficient of variation is proposed to adjust this parameter. To further tailor performance, a weighted version of the proposed estimator is introduced to exploit varying statistics of input samples. Finally, the proposed method is evaluated and compared to well-accepted methods through simulations utilizing synthetic and real ultrasound data

[1]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  Alin Achim,et al.  Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[4]  Yunhan Dong,et al.  Toward edge sharpening: a SAR speckle filtering algorithm , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Moncef Gabbouj,et al.  Weighted median filters: a tutorial , 1996 .

[6]  Torbjørn Eltoft,et al.  The Rician inverse Gaussian distribution: a new model for non-Rayleigh signal amplitude statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  P. Shankar Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[9]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  João M. Sanches,et al.  A Rayleigh reconstruction/interpolation algorithm for 3D ultrasound , 2000, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  T. Loupas,et al.  An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images , 1989 .

[15]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Line and boundary detection in speckle images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Restoration Of Images With Speckle , 1983, Optics & Photonics.

[17]  E. Nezry,et al.  Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity , 1990 .

[18]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[19]  F. L. Thurstone,et al.  Acoustic Speckle: Theory and Experimental Analysis , 1979 .

[20]  Torbjørn Eltoft,et al.  Modeling the amplitude statistics of ultrasonic images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  Speckle filtering of SAR images based on adaptive windowing , 1999 .

[22]  A. Suvichakorn,et al.  Fast edge-preserving noise reduction for ultrasound images , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[23]  E. Nezry,et al.  Structure detection and statistical adaptive speckle filtering in SAR images , 1993 .

[24]  S.A. Kassam,et al.  Robust techniques for signal processing: A survey , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  H. N. Nagaraja,et al.  Order Statistics, Third Edition , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[26]  H O Dickinson,et al.  Risk of cardiovascular disease measured by carotid intima-media thickness at age 49-51: lifecourse study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  P M Shankar,et al.  A model for ultrasonic scattering from tissues based on the K distribution. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Estimation of K distribution parameters using neural networks , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  E. Nezry,et al.  Maximum A Posteriori Speckle Filtering And First Order Texture Models In Sar Images , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  Modeling SAR images with a generalization of the Rayleigh distribution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[33]  Gonzalo R. Arce,et al.  Nonlinear Signal Processing - A Statistical Approach , 2004 .

[34]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Speckle Suppression and Analysis for Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1985, Optics & Photonics.