Multiple Feature-Based Superpixel-Level Decision Fusion for Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Classification

The rapid increase in the number of remote sensing sensors makes it possible to develop multisource feature extraction and fusion techniques to improve the classification accuracy of surface materials. It has been reported that light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data can contribute complementary information to hyperspectral images (HSIs). In this article, a multiple feature-based superpixel-level decision fusion (MFSuDF) method is proposed for HSIs and LiDAR data classification. Specifically, superpixel-guided kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is first designed and applied to HSIs to both reduce the dimensions and compress the noise impact. Next, 2-D and 3-D Gabor filters are, respectively, employed on the KPCA-reduced HSIs and LiDAR data to obtain discriminative Gabor features, and the magnitude and phase information are both taken into account. Three different modules, including the raw data-based feature cube (concatenated KPCA-reduced HSIs and LiDAR data), the Gabor magnitude feature cube, and the Gabor phase feature cube (concatenation of the corresponding Gabor features extracted from the KPCA-reduced HSIs and LiDAR data), can be, thus, achieved. After that, random forest (RF) classifier and quadrant bit coding (QBC) are introduced to separately accomplish the classification task on the aforementioned three extracted feature cubes. Alternatively, two superpixel maps are generated by utilizing the multichannel simple noniterative clustering (SNIC) and entropy rate superpixel segmentation (ERS) algorithms on the combined HSIs and LiDAR data, which are then used to regularize the three classification maps. Finally, a weighted majority voting-based decision fusion strategy is incorporated to effectively enhance the joint use of the multisource data. The proposed approach is, thus, named MFSuDF. A series of experiments are conducted on three real-world data sets to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MFSuDF approach. The experimental results show that our MFSuDF can achieve the overall accuracy of 73.64%, 93.88%, and 74.11% for Houston, Trento, and Missouri University and University of Florida (MUUFL) Gulport data sets, respectively, when there are only three samples per class for training.

[1]  Berkan Demirel,et al.  Importance Of Band Selection For Ethene And Methanol Gas Detection In Hyperspectral Imagery , 2018, 2018 9th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[2]  Pascal Fua,et al.  SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Binbin Pan,et al.  A novel discriminant criterion based on feature fusion strategy for face recognition , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[4]  Krishna Pratap Singh,et al.  Localization in wireless sensor network using LLE-ISOMAP algorithm , 2017, TENCON 2017 - 2017 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[5]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  A Novel MKL Model of Integrating LiDAR Data and MSI for Urban Area Classification , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising and dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet packets, neighbour shrinking and principal component analysis , 2009 .

[7]  Mark A. Iwen,et al.  Extension of PCA to Higher Order Data Structures: An Introduction to Tensors, Tensor Decompositions, and Tensor PCA , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Umar Mohammed,et al.  Superpixel lattices , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Fusion of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Remote Sensing Data Using Multiple Feature Learning , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[10]  LinLin Shen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Gabor Wavelets for Pixel-Based Hyperspectral Imagery Classification , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  A Survey on Spectral–Spatial Classification Techniques Based on Attribute Profiles , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Local Binary Pattern-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification With Superpixel Guidance , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Shutao Li,et al.  Multiscale Superpixel-Based Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Jiasong Zhu,et al.  Collaborative Representation-Based Multiscale Superpixel Fusion for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Silvia Bravo,et al.  A Random Forest Approach for Predicting the Microwave Drying Process of Amaranth Seeds , 2019, 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT).

[16]  Shiming Xiang,et al.  Efficient Multiple Feature Fusion With Hashing for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification: A Comparative Study , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Qian Du,et al.  Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Classification Using Kernel Collaborative Representation Based Residual Fusion , 2019, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Pedram Ghamisi,et al.  Hyperspectral and LiDAR Fusion Using Extinction Profiles and Total Variation Component Analysis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Ying Li,et al.  Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery with 3D Convolutional Neural Network , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[20]  J. Chanussot,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[21]  Mengmeng Zhang,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral and LIDAR data using extinction profiles with feature fusion , 2017 .

[22]  Wei Wei,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification via Discriminative Sparse Representation with Extended LBP Texture , 2014, CIT 2014.

[23]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Kernel Principal Component Analysis , 1997, ICANN.

[24]  Qian Du,et al.  Modified Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[25]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Image Classification using Random Forests and Ferns , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[26]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Kernel Principal Component Analysis for the Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data over Urban Areas , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[27]  Olaf Hellwich,et al.  Feature-independent classification of hyperspectral images by projection-based random forests , 2015, 2015 7th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[28]  D. Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information , 1946 .

[29]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Supervised Locally Linear Embedding for polarimetric SAR image classification , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[30]  LinLin Shen,et al.  3D Gabor wavelets for evaluating SPM normalization algorithm , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[31]  Biao Hou,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Data Using 3-D Morphological Profile , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[32]  Sidik Mulyono,et al.  Comparative analysis of PCA and KPCA on paddy growth stages classification , 2016, 2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP).

[33]  Craig L. Glennie,et al.  Terrestrial Hyperspectral Image Shadow Restoration through Lidar Fusion , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[34]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Subspace-Based Support Vector Machines for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[35]  Qingquan Li,et al.  A 3-D Gabor Phase-Based Coding and Matching Framework for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[36]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Superpixel-Based Multitask Learning Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  Behnaz Bigdeli,et al.  A Dempster Shafer-based fuzzy multisensor fusion system using airborne lidar and hyperspectral imagery , 2018 .

[38]  S. B. Kulkarni,et al.  Approches and challenges in classification for hyperspectral data: A review , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT).

[39]  Naoto Yokoya,et al.  Fusion of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data With a Novel Ensemble Classifier , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[40]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  A Multichannel Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix for Multi/Hyperspectral Image Texture Representation , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Generalized Graph-Based Fusion of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Using Morphological Features , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[42]  Rui Huang,et al.  Using Random Forest to integrate lidar data and hyperspectral imagery for land cover classification , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[43]  Yi Wang,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images by SVM Using a Composite Kernel by Employing Spectral, Spatial and Hierarchical Structure Information , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[44]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[45]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[46]  Qian Du,et al.  Feature Extraction for Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Using Patch-to-Patch CNN , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[47]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Combining feature fusion and decision fusion for classification of hyperspectral and LiDAR data , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[48]  Qingquan Li,et al.  A Two-Stage Feature Selection Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Few Labeled Samples , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[49]  Yicong Zhou,et al.  Dimension Reduction Using Spatial and Spectral Regularized Local Discriminant Embedding for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[50]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Gabor Cube Selection Based Multitask Joint Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[51]  Qian Du,et al.  Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Fusion: Outcome of the 2013 GRSS Data Fusion Contest , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[52]  Soo-Young Lee,et al.  Discriminant Independent Component Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[53]  Dong Liang,et al.  Hyperspectral Band Selection via Rank Minimization , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[54]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Classification Based on 3-D DWT and Decision Fusion for Hyperspectral Image Analysis , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[55]  Nathan D. Cahill,et al.  SLIC superpixels for efficient graph-based dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[56]  John G. Daugman,et al.  Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[57]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Fusion of Hyperspectral and Lidar Images Using Non-Subsampled Shearlettransform , 2018, IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[58]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Superpixels and Polygons Using Simple Non-iterative Clustering , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[59]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Efficient Superpixel-Level Multitask Joint Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[60]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification via Kernel Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[61]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Generalized Composite Kernel Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[62]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Extended profiles with morphological attribute filters for the analysis of hyperspectral data , 2010 .

[63]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images With a Superpixel-Based Discriminative Sparse Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[64]  John Daugman,et al.  High Confidence Visual Recognition of Persons by a Test of Statistical Independence , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[65]  Liu Yang,et al.  An Improved Random Forest Algorithm Based on Attribute Compatibility , 2019, 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC).

[66]  Bin Deng,et al.  A Gabor feature fusion framework for hyperspectral imagery classification , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[67]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Entropy rate superpixel segmentation , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[68]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  An Overview and Comparison of Smooth Labeling Methods for Land-Cover Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.