New Evidence on the Relation between Return Volatility and Trading Volume

In the empirical literature, it has been shown that there exists both linear and non-linear bi-directional causality between trading volumes and return volatility (measured by the square of daily return). We re-examine this claim by using realized volatility as an estimator of the unobserved volatility, adopting a stationary de-trended trading volume, and applying a more recent data sample with robustness tests over time. Our linear Granger causality test shows that there is no causal linear relation running from volume to volatility, but there exists an ambiguous causality for the reverse direction. In contrast, we find strong bi-directional non-linear Granger causality between these two variables. On the basis of the non-linear forecasting modeling technique, this study provides strong evidence to support the sequential information hypothesis and demonstrates that it is useful to use lagged values of trading volume to predict return volatility. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Andersen.  Return Volatility and Trading Volume: An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility , 1996 .

[2]  Michael L. Smirlock,et al.  A FURTHER EXAMINATION OF STOCK PRICE CHANGES AND TRANSACTION VOLUME , 1985 .

[3]  Francis X. Diebold,et al.  Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility , 2001 .

[4]  P. Wilson,et al.  The Causal Relationship Between Real Estate and Stock Markets , 2000 .

[5]  T. W. Epps,et al.  The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-Distributions Hypothesis , 1976 .

[6]  John C. Fellingham,et al.  An Equilibrium Model of Asset Trading with Sequential Information Arrival , 1981 .

[7]  Douglas M. Patterson,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos, And Instability , 1994 .

[8]  Abhay Abhyankar.  Linear and nonlinear Granger causality: Evidence from the U.K. stock index futures market , 1998 .

[9]  Alan G. White,et al.  The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities , 1987 .

[10]  Chris Brooks.  Predicting stock index volatility: can market volume help? , 1998 .

[11]  P. Clark.  A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices , 1973 .

[12]  M. Firth,et al.  The Dynamic Relation Between Stock Returns, Trading Volume, and Volatility , 2001 .

[13]  G. Schwert.  Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change Over Time? , 1988 .

[14]  R. C. Merton,et al.  On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation , 1980 .

[15]  Yue Ma,et al.  Testing for a nonlinear relationship among fundamentals and exchange rates in the ERM , 2000 .

[16]  Thomas E. Copeland,et al.  A Model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival , 1976 .

[17]  Daniel B. Nelson.  CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY IN ASSET RETURNS: A NEW APPROACH , 1991 .

[18]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Linear and nonlinear causality between changes in consumption and consumer attitudes , 2009 .

[19]  B. LeBaron,et al.  A test for independence based on the correlation dimension , 1996 .

[20]  GDP growth and the composite leading index: a nonlinear causality analysis for eleven countries , 2002 .

[21]  F. Diebold,et al.  The distribution of realized stock return volatility , 2001 .

[22]  N. Shephard,et al.  Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models , 2002 .

[23]  Clive W. J. Granger,et al.  Testing for neglected nonlinearity in time series models: A comparison of neural network methods and alternative tests , 1993 .

[24]  Paul Newbold,et al.  Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors , 1997 .

[25]  Kerry Back,et al.  Asset pricing for general processes , 1991 .

[26]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Policy change and lead–lag relations among China's segmented stock markets , 2008 .

[27]  K. French,et al.  Expected stock returns and volatility , 1987 .

[28]  Maosen Zhong,et al.  Intraday Trading Volume and Return Volatility of the Djia Stocks: A Note , 2002 .

[29]  N. Shephard,et al.  Non‐Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck‐based models and some of their uses in financial economics , 2001 .

[30]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  ANSWERING THE SKEPTICS: YES, STANDARD VOLATILITY MODELS DO PROVIDE ACCURATE FORECASTS* , 1998 .

[31]  L. Glosten,et al.  On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks , 1993 .

[32]  Lawrence Harris,et al.  Transaction Data Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis , 1987, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[33]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Stock Prices and Volume , 1992 .

[34]  Cointegration and Detectable Linear and Nonlinear Causality: Analysis Using the London Metal Exchange Lead Contract , 2004 .

[35]  Craig Hiemstra,et al.  Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price-Volume Relation , 1994 .