Design and analysis of a new generation of CLT propellers

Abstract In this work, the design and the analysis of the performance of an improved tip loaded propeller geometry are proposed. Based on the experimental data and on the numerical results collected at SISTEMAR and at the University of Genoa in the case of Contracted and Tip Loaded (CLT) propellers, a new tip loaded propeller geometry is devised in order to mitigate some of the downsides of the CLT geometries increasingly adopted to improve full-scale propeller efficiency. The modified tip loaded propeller, i.e. a mix between a tip rake and a Contracted and Tip Loaded propeller, is designed via an optimization strategy using a Boundary Elements Method (BEM), a custom parametric description of the unconventional blade geometry and an optimization algorithm (of genetic type) within the modeFRONTIER environment. The reliability of the design process and of the improvements achievable with the modified tip loaded propeller are extensively verified with dedicated RANSE calculations. At first, the accuracy of the BEM, adopted for the design by optimization, is verified in terms of predicted propeller performance in order to assess its applicability for the analysis of modified tip geometries and check its confidence with respect to the allowable modifications of the blade shape. As a second step, viscous calculations are adopted to confirm the improvements of the newly designed geometries, in terms of both cavitation and predicted velocity field downstream the propeller, as a result of a better adaptation of the end plate geometry to the incoming flow. Finally, a set of unsteady calculations, by using the unsteady BEM, is carried out to verify the amplitude of the induced pressure pulses and, by comparing these numerical results with the available measurements and calculations in the case of a reference CLT propeller, to confirm the effectiveness of the modified propeller tip shape.

[1]  Georges L. Chahine,et al.  Numerical study of cavitation inception due to vortex/vortex interaction in a ducted propulsor , 2008 .

[2]  N. Fine Nonlinear analysis of cavitating propellers in nonuniform flow , 1992 .

[3]  S. Kinnas,et al.  A boundary element method for the analysis of the flow around 3-D cavitating hydrofoils , 1993 .

[4]  J. Dang Improving cavitation performance with new blade sections for marine propellers , 2004 .

[5]  Mark Drela,et al.  Viscous flow around marine propellers using boundary layer strip theory , 1994 .

[6]  Jill Carlton,et al.  Marine Propellers and Propulsion , 2007 .

[7]  A. Sánchez-Caja,et al.  Scale effects on tip loaded propeller performance using a RANSE solver , 2014 .

[8]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  Endplate effect propellers: A numerical overview , 2011 .

[9]  C. Merkle,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation , 1998 .

[10]  Ja Sparenberg,et al.  ON THE INFLUENCE OF CHOICE OF GENERATOR LINES ON THE OPTIMUM EFFICIENCY OF SCREW PROPELLERS , 1990 .

[11]  A. Morán-Guerrero,et al.  New generation of CLT® propellers , 2016 .

[12]  Antonio Sanchez Caja,et al.  Simulation of the Incompressible Viscous Flow around an Endplate Propeller Using a RANSE Solver , 2006 .

[13]  Diego Villa,et al.  An Investigation on the Discrepancies Between RANSE and BEM Approaches for the Prediction of Marine Propeller Unsteady Performances in Strongly Non-Homogeneous Wakes , 2014 .

[14]  A. K. Singhal,et al.  Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model , 2002 .

[15]  Ching-Yeh Hsin,et al.  Development and analysis of panel methods for propellers in unsteady flow , 1990 .

[16]  Poul Andersen,et al.  Development of a Marine Propeller With Nonplanar Lifting Surfaces , 2005 .

[17]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Nueva Generación de Hélices CLT ® Optimizadas para su Aplicación en Buques Militares , 2016 .

[18]  M. Brown,et al.  Improving Propeller Efficiency Through Tip Loading , 2014 .

[19]  Stefano Gaggero,et al.  Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using boundary element methods and optimization algorithms , 2016 .

[20]  Giorgio Tani,et al.  A study on the numerical prediction of propellers cavitating tip vortex , 2014 .

[21]  Marc Vantorre,et al.  Proceedings of the 21st International Towing Tank Conference, ITTC'96: Report of the Manoeuvrability Committee , 1996 .

[22]  Søren Vang Andersen,et al.  HYDRODYNAMIC DESIGN OF PROPELLERS WITH UNCONVENTIONAL GEOMETRY , 1987 .

[23]  Spyridon A Kinnas,et al.  Numerical Model of Cavitating Propeller Inside of a Tunnel , 1999 .

[24]  L. Morino,et al.  Subsonic Potential Aerodynamics for Complex Configurations: A General Theory , 1974 .

[25]  K Jong,et al.  MODEL TESTING OF AN OPTIMALLY DESIGNED PROPELLER WITH TWO-SIDED SHIFTED END PLATES ON THE BLADES , 1994 .

[26]  S. Kinnas,et al.  Propeller sheet cavitation predictions using a panel method , 1999 .

[27]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  CPP propeller cavitation and noise optimization at different pitches with panel code and validation by cavitation tunnel measurements , 2012 .

[28]  Diego Villa,et al.  Steady cavitating propeller performance by using OpenFOAM, StarCCM+and a boundary element method , 2017 .

[29]  Stefano Brizzolara,et al.  EFD and CFD Characterization of a CLT Propeller , 2012 .

[30]  D. R. Stinebring,et al.  A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction , 2000 .

[31]  Stefano Gaggero,et al.  Comparison of different scaling methods for model tests with CLT propellers , 2014 .

[32]  Cesare Mario Rizzo,et al.  EFD and CFD Design and Analysis of a Propeller in Decelerating Duct , 2012 .

[33]  Luca Bonfiglio,et al.  A Multiphase RANSE-based Computational Tool for the Analysis of Super-Cavitating Hydrofoils , 2016 .