Inter-receptor communication through arrays of bacterial chemoreceptors

The sensing mechanisms of chemotactic bacteria allow them to respond sensitively to stimuli. Escherichia coli, for example, respond to changes in chemoattractant concentration of less than 10% over a range spanning six orders of magnitude. Sensitivity over this range depends on a nonlinear relationship between ligand concentration and output response. At low ligand concentrations, substantial amplification of the chemotactic signal is required; however, the mechanism responsible for this amplification remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that inter-receptor communication within a lattice acts to amplify and integrate sensory information. Synthetic multivalent ligands that interact through the low-abundance, galactose-sensing receptor Trg stabilize large clusters of chemoreceptors and markedly enhance signal output from these enforced clusters. On treatment with multivalent ligands, the response to the attractant serine is amplified by at least 100-fold. This amplification requires a full complement of chemoreceptors; deletion of the aspartate (Tar) or dipeptide (Tap) receptors diminishes the amplification of the serine response. These results demonstrate that the entire array is involved in sensing. This mode of information exchange has general implications for the processing of signals by cellular receptors.

[1]  Jason E. Gestwicki,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Protein Location in Bacteria andArchaea , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Stephan C. Schuster,et al.  Assembly and function of a quaternary signal transduction complex monitored by surface plasmon resonance , 1993, Nature.

[3]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis toward specific chemicals. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Gold,et al.  New views of BCR structure and organization. , 2001, Current opinion in immunology.

[5]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. , 1993, Science.

[6]  M. Surette,et al.  Receptor‐mediated protein kinase activation and the mechanism of transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[7]  F. A. Lai,et al.  Intrinsic lattice formation by the ryanodine receptor calcium-release channel , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[8]  J. Sekelsky,et al.  Use of a computer to assay motility in bacteria. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  Frederick W. Dahlquist,et al.  Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway , 1992, Cell.

[10]  A. M. Schnoes,et al.  Designed potent multivalent chemoattractants for Escherichia coli. , 2001, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[11]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Genetics of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli: organization of the tar region , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Homma,et al.  Signaling by the Escherichia coli Aspartate Chemoreceptor Tar with a Single Cytoplasmic Domain per Dimer , 1996, Science.

[14]  Joanne I. Yeh,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of the ligand-binding domain of a wild-type bacterial chemotaxis receptor. Structural comparison to the cross-linked mutant forms and conformational changes upon ligand binding. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  Gerald L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Comparison In Vitro of a High- and a Low-Abundance Chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli: Similar Kinase Activation but Different Methyl-Accepting Activities , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  P. Gardina,et al.  Attractant Signaling by an Aspartate Chemoreceptor Dimer with a Single Cytoplasmic Domain , 1996, Science.

[17]  R. Germain,et al.  Information transfer at the immunological synapse , 2000, Current Biology.

[18]  P. Leroux,et al.  Identification of multiple somatostatin receptors in the rat somatosensory cortex during development , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  R. Grubbs,et al.  The development of L2X2Ru=CHR olefin metathesis catalysts: an organometallic success story. , 2001, Accounts of chemical research.

[20]  S. Khan,et al.  Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Adler,et al.  The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Chemotaxis Toward Sugars in Escherichia coli , 1973, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  L. Kiessling,et al.  Tuning chemotactic responses with synthetic multivalent ligands. , 2000, Chemistry & biology.

[24]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  M. Gilmore,et al.  Two-component regulator of Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin responds to quorum-sensing autoinduction , 2002, Nature.

[26]  T. Duke,et al.  Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. Bren,et al.  How Signals Are Heard during Bacterial Chemotaxis: Protein-Protein Interactions in Sensory Signal Propagation , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[29]  D E Koshland,et al.  A piston model for transmembrane signaling of the aspartate receptor. , 1999, Science.

[30]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[31]  R. Weis,et al.  The serine chemoreceptor from Escherichia coli is methylated through an inter-dimer process. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[32]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Multiple forms of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins distinguished by a factor in addition to multiple methylation , 1981, Journal of bacteriology.