Building resilience in urban settlements through conversion adaptation

The built environment contributes 40% to total global greenhouse gas emissions and 87% of the buildings we will have in 2050 are already built. If predicted climate changes are correct we need to adapt existing stock sustainably. Reuse is an inherently sustainable option, which reduces the amount of waste going to landfill. Inevitably settlements and areas undergo change, whereby land uses become obsolete and buildings vacant. At this stage, the options are either to demolish or to convert to another use. In central business districts (CBDs) outside of Australia there is a long history of office to residential conversion. Although these types of conversions are few in number in the Sydney and Melbourne CBD, a trend is emerging in conversion. Some 102,000m2 of office space is earmarked for residential conversion in Sydney as demand for central residential property grows and low interest rates create good conditions. Coupled with this, is a stock of ageing offices and a population projected to increase by 4% to 2031 requiring 45000 new homes. With the Sydney market about to be flooded with the Barangaroo office supply in 2017, the conditions for residential conversion are better than ever. However; what is the level of sustainability in these projects? This paper investigates the nature and extent of the phenomena in Sydney, as well as the political, economic, social, environmental and technological drivers and barriers to successful conversion. Through international comparisons with cases in the Netherlands, the paper identifies the key lessons. To date no major study has been conducted into the Sydney market nor into conversion adaptation. Furthermore most residential development has comprised new construction. There is substantial potential to change the nature of the CBD with residential conversion of office space and this paper explores this potential.

[1]  Hilde Remøy,et al.  The negative externalities of structurally vacant offices: An exploration of externalities in the built environment using hedonic price analysis , 2011 .

[2]  David Gann,et al.  Flexible Planning and Flexible Buildings: Reusing Redundant Office Space , 1995 .

[3]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field , 2010 .

[4]  Judith Bell,et al.  教育与社科研究入门指南(第三版) = Doing Your Research Project , 1999 .

[5]  Kazunobu Minami A Study of the Urban Tissue Design for Reorganizing Urban Environments -A Case Study of the Shimbashi Areas of Tokyo , 2007 .

[6]  Mia Ala-Juusela,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers , 2009 .

[7]  Robert A. Beauregard,et al.  The Textures of Property Markets: Downtown Housing and Office Conversions in New York City , 2005 .

[8]  Francis K.W. Wong,et al.  Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[9]  Tim Heath,et al.  Adaptive re-use of offices for residential use , 2001 .

[10]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia , 2009 .

[11]  Theo van der Voordt,et al.  A new life : Conversion of vacant office buildings into housing , 2007 .

[12]  Colin Sharp Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[13]  Hilde Remøy,et al.  Out of Office: A Study on the Cause of Office Vacancy and Transformation as a Means to Cope and Prevent , 2010 .

[14]  M. H. Quenouille,et al.  Survey Methods in Social Investigation , 1973 .

[15]  Peter A. Bullen Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings , 2007 .

[16]  Hilde Remøy,et al.  Conversion of office buildings , 2007 .