Influence of Spatial Frequency, Luminance, and Duration on Binocular Rivalry and Abnormal Fusion of Briefly Presented Dichoptic Stimuli

Orthogonal gratings, presented dichoptically, do not fuse into a single percept. Parts of each are seen while other parts are suppressed in an unstable perception (binocular rivalry). However, it has been previously noted that, if the gratings are briefly flashed, they will appear to fuse into a plaid or checkerboard pattern. Three experiments are reported which have been designed to define more clearly the spatial and temporal parameters of this effect in the hope that this would lead to better understanding of the normal mechanisms of dominance and suppression. Stimuli appear fused if flashed for less than 150 ms. The effect is independent of substantial changes in spatial frequency and luminance. Single flashes that appear fused when presented in isolation produce rivalry if separated by intervals less than about 150 ms. Intervals greater than 150 ms produce continued abnormal fusion. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

[1]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Learning to See Complex Random-Dot Stereograms , 1975 .

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. , 1974, Vision research.

[3]  R. Blake,et al.  Is binocular vision always monocular? , 1978, Science.

[4]  I. Kaplan,et al.  LIGHT INTENSITY AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  N J Wade,et al.  Monocular and Binocular Rivalry between Contours , 1975, Perception.

[6]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash , 1984, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Roufs.  Dynamic properties of vision. V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. , 1974, Vision research.

[8]  T. Bower,et al.  Temporal effects in binocular vision , 1964 .

[9]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[10]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  H. Asher.  Suppression Theory of Binocular Vision * , 1953, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  J. Enoch.  Quantitative layer-by-layer perimetry. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  L. Kaufman,et al.  ON THE SPREAD OF SUPPRESSION AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY. , 1963, Vision research.

[15]  K N Ogle,et al.  Stereoscopic depth and binocular rivalry. , 1967, Vision research.

[16]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Binocular fusion and contour suppression , 1970 .

[17]  R. Blake.  Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M. Fahle.  Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency , 1982, Vision Research.

[19]  Frederick L. Kitterle,et al.  The effects of spatial frequency, orientation, and color upon binocular rivalry and monocular pattern alternation , 1980 .

[20]  Harold P. Bechtoldt,et al.  Binocular integration in line rivalry , 1978 .

[21]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  MONOPTIC AND DICHOPTIC VISUAL MASKING. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  N. Wade.  Binocular rivalry and binocular fusion of after-images. , 1973, Vision research.

[23]  R. V. Abadi,et al.  Induction masking—a study of some inhibitory interactions during dichoptic viewing , 1976, Vision Research.