When a new technological product launching fails: A multi-method approach of facial recognition and E-WOM sentiment analysis

The dual aim of this research is, firstly, to analyze the physiological and unconscious emotional response of consumers to a new technological product and, secondly, link this emotional response to consumer conscious verbal reports of positive and negative product perceptions. In order to do this, biometrics and self-reported measures of emotional response are combined. On the one hand, a neuromarketing experiment based on the facial recognition of emotions of 10 subjects, when physical attributes and economic information of a technological product are exposed, shows the prevalence of the ambivalent emotion of surprise. On the other hand, a nethnographic qualitative approach of sentiment analysis of 67-user online comments characterise the valence of this emotion as mainly negative in the case and context studied. Theoretical, practical and methodological contributions are anticipated from this paper. From a theoretical point of view this proposal contributes valuable information to the product design process, to an effective development of the marketing mix variables of price and promotion, and to a successful selection of the target market. From a practical point of view, the approach employed in the case study on the product Google Glass provides empirical evidence useful in the decision making process for this and other technological enterprises launching a new product. And from a methodological point of view, the usefulness of integrated neuromarketing-eWOM analysis could contribute to the proliferation of this tandem in marketing research.

[1]  K. Poels,et al.  How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising , 2006 .

[2]  H. Chang,et al.  An fMRI study of advertising appeals and their relationship to product attractiveness and buying intentions , 2016 .

[3]  Christophe Morin,et al.  Neuromarketing: The New Science of Consumer Behavior , 2011 .

[4]  Fabio Babiloni,et al.  Neurophysiological Tools to Investigate Consumer's Gender Differences during the Observation of TV Commercials , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[5]  Rafal Ohme,et al.  Biometric Measures for Interactive Advertising Research , 2011 .

[6]  Seger M. Breugelmans,et al.  On the valence of surprise , 2013, Cognition & emotion.

[7]  Joëlle Vanhamme,et al.  The Link Between Surprise and Satisfaction: An Exploratory Research on how best to Measure Surprise , 2000 .

[8]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Consumer Neuroscience: Applications, Challenges, and Possible Solutions , 2015 .

[9]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  The Face of Need: Facial Emotion Expression on Charity Advertisements , 2009 .

[10]  Thabani Nyoni,et al.  Neuromarketing: No Brain, No Gain! , 2017 .

[11]  Sofia Brandão,et al.  Neuroscience in branding: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on brands’ implicit and explicit impressions , 2012 .

[12]  A. Choromańska,et al.  Analysis of Neurophysiological Reactions to Advertising Stimuli by Means of EEG and Galvanic Skin Response Measures , 2009 .

[13]  Vlăsceanu Sebastian,et al.  Neuromarketing and Evaluation of Cognitive and Emotional Responses of Consumers to Marketing Stimuli. , 2014 .

[14]  A. Schützwohl,et al.  Surprise and schema strength , 1998 .

[15]  Laura Chamberlain,et al.  What is "neuromarketing"? A discussion and agenda for future research. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  P. Ekman,et al.  Smiles when lying. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Lukas Danner,et al.  Make a face! Implicit and explicit measurement of facial expressions elicited by orange juices using face reading technology. , 2014 .

[18]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira,et al.  A review of studies on neuromarketing: practical results, techniques, contributions and limitations , 2014 .

[20]  Natalia Vila-López,et al.  Consumers' physiological and verbal responses towards product packages: Could these responses anticipate product choices? , 2019, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Spectral EEG frontal asymmetries correlate with the experienced pleasantness of TV commercial advertisements , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[22]  Richard L. Hazlett,et al.  提携研究機関誌からの論文紹介 The Advertising Research Foundation 『Journal of Advertising Research』より Which Broadcast Medium Better Drives Engagement? : Measuring the Powers of Radio and Television with Electromyography and Skin-Conductance Measurements , 2012 .

[23]  Francisco Muñoz-Leiva,et al.  Measuring advertising effectiveness in Travel 2.0 websites through eye-tracking technology , 2019, Physiology & Behavior.

[24]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  F. B. Işin,et al.  Perceptions of marketing academics, neurologists, and marketing professionals about neuromarketing , 2011 .

[26]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  On the Use of EEG or MEG Brain Imaging Tools in Neuromarketing Research , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[27]  T. Bonoma,et al.  Nonverbal Communication in Marketing: Toward a Communicational Analysis , 1977 .

[28]  Juan Sánchez-Fernández,et al.  The contribution of neuroscience to consumer research: A conceptual framework and empirical review , 2013 .

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Neural Basis for Brain Responses to TV Commercials: A High-Resolution EEG Study , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Visual–Tactual Incongruities in Products as Sources of Surprise , 2009 .

[32]  William H. Hampton,et al.  Predicting Advertising success beyond Traditional Measures: New Insights from Neurophysiological Methods and Market Response Modeling , 2015 .

[33]  José M. Arana,et al.  La expresión facial de las emociones: Historia y aplicaciones , 2013 .

[34]  Jon D. Morris,et al.  Decoding Neural Responses To Emotion in Television Commercials , 2016, Journal of Advertising Research.

[35]  P. Kenning,et al.  What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging , 2008 .

[36]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  P. Steidl,et al.  Neuromarketing For Dummies , 2013 .

[38]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Goal-directed behaviors in marketing: The role of emotion, volition, and motivation , 1997 .

[39]  Mohamed M. Mostafa,et al.  Brain processing of vocal sounds in advertising: A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Vanessa Apaolaza,et al.  Nature imagery in advertising , 2013 .

[41]  Annie Lang,et al.  How Reliable Are Neuromarketers' Measures of Advertising Effectiveness? , 2015, Journal of Advertising Research.

[42]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[43]  Fabio Babiloni,et al.  Electronic evaluation for video commercials by impression index , 2013, Cognitive Neurodynamics.