Longitudinal river ecohydrology: flow variation down the lengths of alluvial rivers

Longitudinal flow variation is an emerging field of study in river ecohydrology. Longitudinal changes in the frequencies, magnitudes, durations and timing of floods, low-flows and intermittence create a dynamic environment for flow-dependent species and ecological processes. Analyses of flow variation and flow–ecosystem relationships in the longitudinal dimension require synoptic flow time-series at multiple sites along a river. Complex channel geomorphology and a scarcity of rivers equipped with multiple flow gauges have slowed progress in longitudinal ecohydrology. The empirical longitudinal flow model (ELFMOD) is a new statistical tool for estimating flows at multiple points along rivers; which circumvents the requirement for multiple gauges. In this study, we used ELFMOD to explore longitudinal flow variation in four alluvial rivers from different geological terrains and climate zones: the Albarine (France), Methow (USA) and Selwyn and Orari (New Zealand). Differences among rivers in longitudinal and temporal flow variation were evident on date × location flow matrices and longitudinal profiles. There were notable differences among longitudinal gradients in flow magnitude and flow percentiles, and in the recurrence, extent, and rate of expansion and contraction of dry river reaches. There were also large differences in longitudinal flow-permanence patterns. Temporal variation in the lengths of dry channel and numbers of dry reaches was predominately seasonal in the Albarine and Methow, and interannual in the Orari and Selwyn. Broad differences among the rivers in longitudinal flow patterns correspond to differences in the configuration of hydrogeomorphic discontinuities such as tributary confluences, channel divergences and convergences, and lithological contacts. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  I. Chaubey,et al.  FLOOD PULSE DYNAMICS OF AN UNREGULATED RIVER FLOODPLAIN IN THE SOUTHEASTERN U.S. COASTAL PLAIN , 2000 .

[2]  D. Rupp,et al.  Reconstruction of a daily flow record along a hydrologically complex alluvial river , 2008 .

[3]  S. Larned,et al.  Invertebrate and microbial responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: effects of preceding dry periods , 2007, Aquatic Sciences.

[4]  M. Bayani Cardenas,et al.  The effect of river bend morphology on flow and timescales of surface water–groundwater exchange across pointbars , 2008 .

[5]  I. Jowett,et al.  INSTREAM FLOW METHODS: A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES , 1997 .

[6]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[7]  Judith L. Li,et al.  Restricted hyporheic exchange in an alluvial river system: implications for theory and management , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[8]  C. Konrad.  Location and timing of river-aquifer exchanges in six tributaries to the Columbia River in the Pacific Northwest of the United States , 2006 .

[9]  D. Arscott,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing Longitudinal and Temporal Variation in River Flow and Developing Flow‐Ecology Relationships 1 , 2010 .

[10]  B. Biggs,et al.  Flow variables for ecological studies in temperate streams: groupings based on covariance , 2000 .

[11]  Mary Lynn Baeck,et al.  Hydrologic analysis of the Fort Collins, Colorado, flash flood of 1997 , 2000 .

[12]  E. Stanley,et al.  Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams , 2005 .

[13]  C. Baxter,et al.  Geomorphology, hyporheic exchange, and selection of spawning habitat by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) , 2000 .

[14]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[15]  G. Poole.  Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum , 2002 .

[16]  B. Biggs,et al.  Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams , 1997 .

[17]  Jessica D. Lundquist,et al.  Seasonal and Spatial Patterns in Diurnal Cycles in Streamflow in the Western United States , 2002 .

[18]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Emerging concepts in temporary‐river ecology , 2010 .

[19]  John E. Brittain,et al.  Invertebrate drift — A review , 1988, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  W. Woessner.  Stream and Fluvial Plain Ground Water Interactions: Rescaling Hydrogeologic Thought , 2000 .

[21]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[22]  Stephen P. Rice,et al.  Tributaries, sediment sources, and the longitudinal organisation of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems , 2001 .

[23]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Diffusion of floodwaves , 1996 .

[24]  R. J. Wagner,et al.  Hydrogeology of the Unconsolidated Sediments, Water Quality, and Ground-Water/Surface-Water Exchanges in the Methow River Basin, Okanogan County, Washington , 2003 .

[25]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  A modelling study of hyporheic exchange pattern and the sequence, size, and spacing of stream bedforms in mountain stream networks, Oregon, USA , 2006 .

[26]  D. Hicks,et al.  The Selwyn River of New Zealand: a benchmark system for alluvial plain rivers , 2008 .

[27]  D. Hannah,et al.  Flow variability and macroinvertebrate community response within riverine systems , 2006 .

[28]  C. Konrad.  Longitudinal hydraulic analysis of river‐aquifer exchanges , 2006 .

[29]  Mike Acreman,et al.  Defining environmental river flow requirements ? a review , 2004 .

[30]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[31]  M. Sophocleous.  Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[32]  K. Hughey,et al.  The Use of an Ecologic Classification to Improve Water Resource Planning in New Zealand , 2005, Environmental management.

[33]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[34]  K. Tockner,et al.  An extension of the flood pulse concept. , 2000 .

[35]  G. W. Zellweger,et al.  Influence of diurnal variations in stream temperature on streamflow loss and groundwater recharge , 1994 .

[36]  T. Beechie,et al.  Hydrologic spiralling: the role of multiple interactive flow paths in stream ecosystems , 2008 .

[37]  G. Brailsford,et al.  Sources and flow of north Canterbury plains groundwater, New Zealand , 1989 .

[38]  Y. Enzel,et al.  Direct measurements of floodwater infiltration into shallow alluvial aquifers , 2007 .

[39]  D. Blinn,et al.  AQUATIC FOOD BASE RESPONSE TO THE 1996 TEST FLOOD BELOW GLEN CANYON DAM, COLORADO RIVER, ARIZONA , 2001 .

[40]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards , 2007 .

[41]  Melissa Parsons,et al.  Identifying spatial and temporal patterns in the hydrological character of the Condamine–Balonne river, Australia, using multivariate statistics , 2003 .

[42]  Sébastien Brosse,et al.  Hydrological disturbance benefits a native fish at the expense of an exotic fish. , 2005 .

[43]  E. Vivoni,et al.  Analysis of a monsoon flood event in an ephemeral tributary and its downstream hydrologic effects , 2006 .

[44]  S. Larned,et al.  Responses of hyporheic invertebrate assemblages to large-scale variation in flow permanence and surface–subsurface exchange , 2007 .

[45]  B. Statzner,et al.  Questions and Comments on the River Continuum Concept , 1985 .

[46]  J. Risley,et al.  Estimates of ground-water recharge, base flow, and stream reach gains and losses in the Willamette River basin, Oregon , 2002 .

[47]  I. Jowett,et al.  Effects of floods versus low flows on invertebrates in a New Zealand gravel‐bed river , 2006 .

[48]  A. Mckerchar,et al.  Shifts in flood and low-flow regimes in New Zealand due to interdecadal climate variations , 2003 .

[49]  B. Biggs,et al.  Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function , 2005 .