Segmentation of prostate cancer tissue microarray images

Prostate cancer is diagnosed by histopathology interpretation of hematoxylin and eosin (H and E)-stained tissue sections. Gland and nuclei distributions vary with the disease grade. The morphological features vary with the advance of cancer where the epithelial regions grow into the stroma. An efficient pathology slide image analysis method involved using a tissue microarray with known disease stages. Digital 24-bit RGB images were acquired for each tissue element on the slide with both 10X and 40X objectives. Initial segmentation at low magnification was accomplished using prior spectral characteristics from a training tissue set composed of four tissue clusters; namely, glands, epithelia, stroma and nuclei. The segmentation method was automated by using the training RGB values as an initial guess and iterating the averaging process 10 times to find the four cluster centers. Labels were assigned to the nearest cluster center in red-blue spectral feature space. An automatic threshold algorithm separated the glands from the tissue. A visual pseudo color representation of 60 segmented tissue microarray image was generated where white, pink, red, blue colors represent glands, epithelia, stroma and nuclei, respectively. The higher magnification images provided refined nuclei morphology. The nuclei were detected with a RGB color space principle component analysis that resulted in a grey scale image. The shape metrics such as compactness, elongation, minimum and maximum diameters were calculated based on the eigenvalues of the best-fitting ellipses to the nuclei.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[2]  R. Redner,et al.  Mixture densities, maximum likelihood, and the EM algorithm , 1984 .

[3]  W. Gerald,et al.  Gene expression profiling in single cells within tissue , 2005, Nature Methods.

[4]  Nobuyuki Otsu,et al.  ATlreshold Selection Method fromGray-Level Histograms , 1979 .

[5]  David L Rimm,et al.  Quantitative determination of expression of the prostate cancer protein alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase using automated quantitative analysis (AQUA): a novel paradigm for automated and continuous biomarker measurements. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  Weiqin Jiang,et al.  Using nuclear morphometry to discriminate the tumorigenic potential of cells: a comparison of statistical methods. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[7]  Thomas Gahm,et al.  Automated microscopy in diagnostic histopathology: From image processing to automated reasoning , 1997 .

[8]  [Histologic grading of primary prostatic carcinoma--study of Gleason histologic grading]. , 1987, Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica.

[9]  Alberto G. Ayala,et al.  Prostate pathology , 2004 .

[10]  Robert F Murphy,et al.  From quantitative microscopy to automated image understanding. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[12]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .