Evaluation of Cervical Spine Fracture in the Elderly: Can We Trust Our Physical Examination?

The purpose of this trial was to compare National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria (NC) with computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard to evaluate cervical spine (C-spine) fractures in elderly blunt trauma patients. We prospectively compared adult blunt trauma patients 65 years or older (E) with younger than 65 years (NE), evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of NC compared with CT in these two cohorts. A total of 2785 blunt trauma patients were included of whom 320 were E (average age, 75 years) and 2465 were NE (average age, 36 years). Incidence of C-spine fracture was 12.8 per cent (E) versus 7.4 per cent (NE) (P = 0.002). Age was an independent predictor of fracture (P = 0.01). NC had a sensitivity of 65.9 per cent in E and PPV of 19.3 per cent in E (P = 0.001) versus a sensitivity of 84.2 per cent in NE and PPV of 10.6 per cent (P < 0.0001). The specificity was 59.5 per cent for E versus 42.6 per cent for NE (NPV, 92.2% E vs 97.1% NE). This study suggests that NEXUS criteria are not an appropriate assessment tool when applied to severe blunt trauma patients, particularly in the elderly population who had more missed injures than their younger counterparts. CTshould be used in all blunt trauma patients regardless of whether they meet NEXUS criteria.

[1]  J. Whelan,et al.  National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria is inadequate to rule out fracture after significant blunt trauma compared with computed tomography. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  J. Como,et al.  Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma: update from the eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines committee. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  M. Aschkenasy,et al.  Trauma and falls in the elderly. , 2006, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[4]  J. France,et al.  Helical computed tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high-energy trauma. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  B. Sanchez,et al.  Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  B. Poulose,et al.  Cervical spine evaluation in urban trauma centers: lowering institutional costs and complications through helical CT scan. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  L. Jacobs,et al.  False-Negative Plain Cervical Spine X-Rays in Blunt Trauma , 2003, The American surgeon.

[8]  A Laupacis,et al.  The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  J. Morris,et al.  Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  R. Daffner.  Helical CT of the cervical spine for trauma patients: a time study. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. T. G. Roup,et al.  Correction: Validity of a Set of Clinical Criteria to Rule out Injury to the Cervical Spine in Patients with Blunt Trauma. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  R. Daffner.  Cervical radiography for trauma patients: a time-effective technique? , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Pasquale,et al.  Practice management guidelines for trauma from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.