Segmentation, Feature Extraction, and Multiclass Brain Tumor Classification

Multiclass brain tumor classification is performed by using a diversified dataset of 428 post-contrast T1-weighted MR images from 55 patients. These images are of primary brain tumors namely astrocytoma (AS), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), childhood tumor-medulloblastoma (MED), meningioma (MEN), secondary tumor-metastatic (MET), and normal regions (NR). Eight hundred fifty-six regions of interest (SROIs) are extracted by a content-based active contour model. Two hundred eighteen intensity and texture features are extracted from these SROIs. In this study, principal component analysis (PCA) is used for reduction of dimensionality of the feature space. These six classes are then classified by artificial neural network (ANN). Hence, this approach is named as PCA-ANN approach. Three sets of experiments have been performed. In the first experiment, classification accuracy by ANN approach is performed. In the second experiment, PCA-ANN approach with random sub-sampling has been used in which the SROIs from the same patient may get repeated during testing. It is observed that the classification accuracy has increased from 77 to 91 %. PCA-ANN has delivered high accuracy for each class: AS—90.74 %, GBM—88.46 %, MED—85 %, MEN—90.70 %, MET—96.67 %, and NR—93.78 %. In the third experiment, to remove bias and to test the robustness of the proposed system, data is partitioned in a manner such that the SROIs from the same patient are not common for training and testing sets. In this case also, the proposed system has performed well by delivering an overall accuracy of 85.23 %. The individual class accuracy for each class is: AS—86.15 %, GBM—65.1 %, MED—63.36 %, MEN—91.5 %, MET—65.21 %, and NR—93.3 %. A computer-aided diagnostic system comprising of developed methods for segmentation, feature extraction, and classification of brain tumors can be beneficial to radiologists for precise localization, diagnosis, and interpretation of brain tumors on MR images.

[1]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[2]  Junaed Sattar Snakes , Shapes and Gradient Vector Flow , 2022 .

[3]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Jean-Marc Constans,et al.  A framework of fuzzy information fusion for the segmentation of brain tumor tissues on MR images , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[5]  Marc Acheroy,et al.  Texture classification using Gabor filters , 2002, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Invariant texture segmentation via circular Gabor filters , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[7]  George C. Kagadis,et al.  Improving brain tumor characterization on MRI by probabilistic neural networks and non-linear transformation of textural features , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[8]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[9]  Irene Cheng,et al.  Fluid Vector Flow and Applications in Brain Tumor Segmentation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Andrew R. Webb,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1999 .

[11]  Lawrence O. Hall,et al.  Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  K. R. Rao,et al.  Orthogonal Transforms for Digital Signal Processing , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  George C. Kagadis,et al.  Non-linear Least Squares Features Transformation for Improving the Performance of Probabilistic Neural Networks in Classifying Human Brain Tumors on MRI , 2007, ICCSA.

[14]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  A novel content-based active contour model for brain tumor segmentation. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  Lawrence O. Hall,et al.  Automatic segmentation of non-enhancing brain tumors in magnetic resonance images , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[16]  Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem,et al.  Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification , 2010, Digit. Signal Process..

[17]  Ιωάννης Καλατζής,et al.  Improving brain tumor characterization on MRI by probabilistic neural networks and non-linear transformation of textural features , 2015 .

[18]  A. Kharrat,et al.  A Hybrid Approach for Automatic Classification of Brain MRI Using Genetic Algorithm and Support Vector Machine , 2010 .

[19]  D. Selvathi,et al.  Brain MRI Slices Classification Using Least Squares Support Vector Machine , 2007 .

[20]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Classification of brain tumors using PCA-ANN , 2011, 2011 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies.

[21]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[23]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.