Planning Container Terminal Layouts Considering Equipment Types and Storage Block Design

Currently, several container terminals are being expanded, redesigned or newly built. In all those cases the layout of the container terminal has to be designed. We discuss different technologies which can be used for container terminal operation and describe their impact on the terminal layout. Different container terminal layout categories are defined. For a layout which is typical for the use of automated rail-mounted gantry cranes we propose a procedure to calculate promising storage yard configurations. The results show that smaller block widths lead to higher yard performances, but also to higher cost. Using the proposed block design problem, we are able to calculate all non-dominated solutions, which enables terminal planners to choose a solution for their specific situation. Moreover, we analyze the impact of the reefer racks distribution on the yard performance. The results show that an equal distribution of reefer racks over the existing storage blocks allows the best workload distribution.

[1]  Wen-Jing Hsu,et al.  Travel time analysis of a new automated storage and retrieval system , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Operations research at container terminals: a literature update , 2007, OR Spectr..

[3]  Wen-Jing Hsu,et al.  AS/RS based yard and yard planning , 2008 .

[4]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Effect of block length and yard crane deployment systems on overall performance at a seaport container transshipment terminal , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Holger Schütt,et al.  Conrocaps- modelling intermodal terminals to calculate their capacity , 2008 .

[6]  Iris F. A. Vis,et al.  A comparative analysis of storage and retrieval equipment at a container terminal , 2006 .

[7]  Mansour Rahimi,et al.  Design and analysis of an automated container handling system in seaports , 2008 .

[8]  Kap Hwan Kim,et al.  An optimal layout of container yards , 2008, OR Spectr..

[9]  Yvo A. Saanen,et al.  Comparison of three automated stacking alternatives by means of simulation , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[10]  Kees Jan Roodbergen,et al.  A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Thorsten Koch,et al.  Optimizing the landside operation of a container terminal , 2008, OR Spectr..

[12]  Chin‐Yuan Chu,et al.  Determining container terminal capacity on the basis of an adopted yard handling system , 2005 .

[13]  Leena Suhl,et al.  Mathematical programming and simulation based layout planning of container terminals , 2009, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[14]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLE SYSTEM FOR TWO CONTAINER YARD LAYOUTS , 2004 .

[15]  Matthew E. H. Petering.  Effect of Block Width and Storage Yard Layout on Marine Container Terminal Performance , 2009 .

[16]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Design, simulation, and evaluation of automated container terminals , 2002, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..