Does EU Regulation Hinder or Stimulate Innovation?

One frequently hears the question posed in the title to this report, but there is little systematic analytical literature on the issue. Fragmented evidence or anecdotes dominate debates among EU regulatory decision-makers and in European business, insofar as there is a genuine debate at all. This CEPS Special Report focuses on the multi-faceted, ambiguous and complex relationship between (EU) regulation and innovation in the economy, and discusses the innovation-enhancing potential of certain regulatory approaches as well as factors that tend to reduce incentives to innovate. It adopts an 'ecosystem' approach to both regulation and innovation, and study the interactions between the two ecosystems. This general analysis and survey are complemented by seven case studies of EU regulation enabling and disabling innovation, two horizontal and five sectoral ones. The case studies are preceded by a broader contextual analysis of trends in EU regulation over the last three decades. These trends show the significant transformation of the nature as well as improvement of the quality of EU regulation, largely in the deepened internal market, which tend to have a favourable and lasting effect on the rate of innovation in the EU (other things being equal). Among the findings include the following: Regulation can at times be a powerful stimulus to innovation. EU regulation matters at all stages of the innovation process. Different types of regulation can be identified in terms of innovation impact: general or horizontal, innovation-specific and sector-specific regulation. More prescriptive regulation tends to hamper innovative activity, whereas the more flexible EU regulation is, the better innovation can be stimulated. Lower compliance and red-tape burdens have a positive effect on innovation. The authors recommend incorporating a specific test on innovation impacts in the ex-ante impact assessment of EU legislation as well as in ex-post evaluation. There is ample potential for fostering innovation by reviewing the EU regulatory acquis.

[1]  J. Pelkmans.  The GSM standard: explaining a success story , 2001 .

[2]  Junzo Ishii,et al.  Investment under Regulatory Uncertainty: U.S. Electricity Generation Investment Since 1996 , 2004 .

[3]  G. Roland,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Brazil, China, and Russia , 2006 .

[4]  E. Miguel,et al.  Who are Russia's Entrepreneurs? , 2005 .

[5]  N. Ash́ford,et al.  An Innovation-Based Strategy for a Sustainable Environment , 2000 .

[6]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations , 1996 .

[7]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  Open Global Innovation Networks as Enablers of Frugal Innovation: Propositions Based on Evidence from India , 2012 .

[8]  F. Schiantarelli,et al.  Employment Outcomes and the Interaction between Product and Labor Market Deregulation: Are They Substitutes or Complements? , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  A. Renda,et al.  Innovation law and policy in the European Union , 2012 .

[10]  A. Lusardi,et al.  Explaining International Differences in Entrepreneurship: The Role of Individual Characteristics and Regulatory Constraints , 2008 .

[11]  Ray Worthy Campbell,et al.  Rethinking Regulation and Innovation in the U.S. Legal Services Market , 2012 .

[12]  K. Blind.  The Impact of Regulation on Innovation , 2016 .

[13]  G. M. Peter Swann,et al.  The Economics of Standardization: An Update , 2010 .

[14]  C. Bloch,et al.  Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data , 2005 .

[15]  F. Schivardi,et al.  What determines entrepreneurial clusters , 2011 .

[16]  Leora F. Klapper,et al.  Patterns of Business Creation, Survival and Growth: Evidence from Africa , 2011 .

[17]  I. Ayres.  Optional Law: The Structure of Legal Entitlements , 2005 .

[18]  Davud Rostam‐Afschar.  Entry Regulation and Entrepreneurship - Empirical Evidence from a German Natural Experiment , 2010 .

[19]  A. Renda,et al.  Public and Private Regulation: Mapping the Labyrinth , 2012 .

[20]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[21]  A. Renda,et al.  Single eCOMMs Market? No Such Thing… , 2011 .

[22]  Pontus Braunerhjelm,et al.  Taxes, Tax Administrative Burdens and New Firm Formation , 2014 .

[23]  Damien Geradin,et al.  Standardization and Technological Innovation: Some Reflections on Ex-Ante Licensing, Frand, and the Proper Means to Reward Innovators , 2006, World Competition.

[24]  Tamim A. Bayoumi,et al.  Benefits and Spillovers of Greater Competition in Europe: A Macroeconomic Assessment , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Henry. Wasser,et al.  Creating Entrepreneurial Universities , 2001 .

[26]  Dan Awrey,et al.  Complexity, Innovation and the Regulation of Modern Financial Markets , 2011 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[28]  Sabine Brunswicker,et al.  Beyond Open Innovation in Large Enterprises: How Do Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Open Up to External Innovation Sources? , 2011 .

[29]  Andrea Renda,et al.  Competition-regulation interface in telecommunications: What's left of the essential facility doctrine , 2010 .

[30]  C. Pissarides,et al.  Entrepreneurship, start-up costs and employment , 2001 .

[31]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach , 1997 .

[32]  H. Hollanders,et al.  Regional Innovation Monitor Innovation Patterns and Innovation Policy in European Regions - Trends, Challenges and Perspectives , 2011 .

[33]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[34]  Susan M. Gates,et al.  The Impact of Regulation and Litigation on Small Business and Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[35]  Industrial Policy and Competition , 2015 .

[36]  A. Stel,et al.  The effect of business regulations on nascent and actual entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[37]  E. Miguel,et al.  Entrepreneurship: First Results from Russia , 2004 .

[38]  R. Smith,et al.  Book Review: Labor Conditions: Crisis in the Workplace: Occupational Disease and Injury , 1977 .

[39]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Creating an Innovative Europe: report of the independent expert group on R&D and innovation , 2006 .

[40]  A. Renda,et al.  Comparing the content of regulatory impact assessments in the UK and the EU , 2013 .

[41]  Andrea Bassanini,et al.  " Innovation Policy in International Markets " Wzb Conference on Industrial Organization Labour Market Institutions, Product Market Regulation and Innovation: Cross-country Evidence , 2022 .

[42]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[43]  Luke A. Stewart,et al.  University Research Funding: The United States Is Behind and Falling. , 2011 .

[44]  E. Ehrlich,et al.  The Impact of Regulation on Innovation and Choice in Wireless Communications , 2009 .

[45]  D. Soskice,et al.  Macroeconomics: Imperfections, Institutions and Policies , 2005 .

[46]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance : overcoming the orchestration deficitthrough Orchestration , 2010 .

[47]  Jinhui Li,et al.  An international comparative study of end-of-life vehicle (ELV) recycling systems , 2013, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management.

[48]  A. Alemanno.  The Science, Law and Policy of Neonicotinoids and Bees: A New Test Case for the Precautionary Principle , 2013, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[49]  R. Harrison,et al.  Measuring business angel investment activity in the United Kingdom: a review of potential data sources , 2008 .

[50]  Stefano Scarpetta,et al.  Regulation, Productivity and Growth: OECD Evidence , 2003 .

[51]  M. Porter,et al.  National Innovative Capacity , 2001 .

[52]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[53]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[54]  E. Papaioannou,et al.  Red Tape and Delayed Entry , 2006 .

[55]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[56]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Using Regulation to Change the Market for Innovation , 1985 .

[57]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[58]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[59]  T. Sopraseuth,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Wealth, Liquidity Constraints and Start-Up Costs , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[60]  A. Gawer.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[61]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Global Innovation Scoreboard 2008: The Dynamics of the Innovative Performances of Countries , 2009 .

[62]  M. Schinkel,et al.  Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act , 2013 .

[63]  Fabio Schiantarelli,et al.  Regulation and Investment , 2003 .

[64]  A. Renda,et al.  Assessing the costs and benefits of regulation , 2013 .

[65]  Luke A. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Regulation on Innovation in the United States: A Cross-Industry Literature Review , 2011 .

[66]  M. Schinkel,et al.  Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms , 2014 .

[67]  A. Hoeve,et al.  Learning Entrepreneurs: Learning and Innovation in Small Companies , 2003 .

[68]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[69]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry , 1992, Business History Review.

[70]  Claus Michelsen,et al.  Regulation, Innovation and Technology Diffusion: Evidence from Building Energy Efficiency Standards in Germany , 2014 .

[71]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[72]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  The Impact of Regulation-Driven Environmental Innovation on Innovation Success and Firm Performance , 2011 .

[73]  K. Duane.  PLANTING THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[74]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  Innovation-oriented environmental regulation : theoretical approaches and empirical analysis , 2000 .

[75]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Negotiation as a Means of Developing and Implementing Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Policy , 1999 .

[76]  J. H. Soto.  The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency , 2008 .

[77]  N. Ash́ford.  Crisis in the workplace : occupational disease and injury : a report to the Ford Foundation , 1976 .

[78]  D. Third.  OECD/Eurostat . Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Paris, France: , 2005 .

[79]  Cristie L. Ford.  Financial Innovation and Flexible Regulation: Destabilizing the Regulatory State , 2014 .

[80]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Regulation and Technological Innovation in the Chemical Industry , 1983 .

[81]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States , 2005 .

[82]  Magazine Ah.  The impact of regulation. , 1997 .

[83]  F. Fokus,et al.  The Impact of Standardization and Standards on Innovation Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention , 2013 .

[84]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[85]  A. Renda,et al.  Public and Private Regulation , 2012 .

[86]  P. Larouche,et al.  Does Europe Have an Innovation Policy? The Case of EU Economic Law , 2011 .

[87]  Leora F. Klapper,et al.  Entry Regulation as a Barrier to Entrepreneurship , 2004 .