A new design paradigm for the development of custom-fit soft sockets for lower limb prostheses

This paper presents a new 3D design paradigm for the development of specific custom-fit products, such as the soft socket of prostheses for lower limb amputees. It is centered on the digital model of the human body and, contrarily to the traditional process almost manually based, it considers the integration of methods and tools coming from different research and application fields: Reverse Engineering, Medical Imaging, Virtual Prototyping, Physics-based Simulation, and Rapid Prototyping. The paper describes the techniques adopted to acquire and create the digital model of the residual limb, the procedure to generate the socket model, the strategy developed for the functional simulation of the socket-stump interaction and, finally, the realization of the physical prototype. Each design step is described with the related problems and the obtained results. Both trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees have been considered; however, for now the complete process has been validated for trans-tibial prostheses. Major outcomes of the proposed approach stand in a better quality of the final product, in a shorter involvement of the amputee implying a lower psychological impact, in a limited use of physical prototypes, and in a shorter development time. Moreover, the resulting paradigm answers to the Collaborative Engineering guidelines by optimizing the interaction between different domains and enhancing their contributions in a homogeneous development framework.

[1]  Mario C Faustini,et al.  The quasi-static response of compliant prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees using finite element methods. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Yu Wang,et al.  Design automation for customized apparel products , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  Zheng Shuxian,et al.  3D reconstruction of the structure of a residual limb for customising the design of a prosthetic socket. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Kenneth Cooper,et al.  Rapid Prototyping Technology: Selection and Application , 2001 .

[5]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Tetrahedral Mass Spring Model for Fast Soft Tissue Deformation , 2003, IS4TH.

[6]  Amy A. Gooch,et al.  Graphics Interface 2007 , 2007 .

[7]  R. Assaker,et al.  [Value of a synthetic osseous model obtained by stereo-lithography for preoperative planning. Correction of a complex femoral deformity caused by fibrous dysplasia]. , 1997, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[8]  Caterina Rizzi,et al.  The role of simulation tools to innovate the prosthesis socket design process , 2007 .

[9]  P K Commean,et al.  Below-knee residual limb shape change measurement and visualization. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  Volume Parameterization for Design Automation of Customized Free-Form Products , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[11]  Mark D Geil,et al.  Consistency and accuracy of measurement of lower-limb amputee anthropometrics. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Xiaohong Jia,et al.  Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Joan E. Sanders,et al.  A silhouetting shape sensor for the residual limb of a below-knee amputee , 1995 .

[14]  Nicholas Herbert,et al.  A preliminary investigation into the development of 3-D printing of prosthetic sockets. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Giorgio Colombo,et al.  Reverse engineering and rapid prototyping techniques to innovate prosthesis socket design , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  A.F.T. Mak,et al.  MRI investigation of musculoskeletal action of transfemoral residual limb inside a prosthetic socket , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[17]  Ergin Tönük,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic material property estimation of lower extremity residual limb tissues. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  Innovative Implementation in Socket Design: Digital Models to Customize the Product , 2006 .

[19]  Stefano Filippi,et al.  Cooperative work in medicine: linking together distributed expertise in Hip-prostheses development and surgical planning , 2001 .

[20]  W. Lee,et al.  Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb--dynamic effects. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Michael W. Vannier,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Lower‐Extremity Residua Measurement Systems Error Analysis , 1997 .

[22]  Stefano Filippi,et al.  Concurrent engineering in maxillo-facial surgery: the role of virtual reality and rapid prototyping , 2003, ISPE CE.

[23]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Real time muscle deformations using mass-spring systems , 1998, Proceedings. Computer Graphics International (Cat. No.98EX149).

[24]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  Toward Modeling of a Suturing Task , 2003, Graphics Interface.

[25]  A F Mak,et al.  State-of-the-art methods for geometric and biomechanical assessments of residual limbs: a review. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  E. Tonuk,et al.  Nonlinear elastic material property estimation of lower extremity residual limb tissues , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  Kiran Jude Fernandes,et al.  Reverse Engineering: An Industrial Perspective , 2007 .

[28]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Automated hexahedral mesh generation from biomedical image data: applications in limb prosthetics. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  Parameterization and parametric design of mannequins , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..