The near-wall region of bounded turbulent flows They concluded that rotating, streamwise structures do occur consists of streamwise vortices, low speed streaks, intense shear in the wall region and they often occurred in counter-rotating layers, inflectional velocity profiles, oscillations and ejections pairs. of low speed fluid out into the logarithmic layer. A mass of data has accumulated over the past 25 years concerning this The cumulative evidence from these researchers important chain of e,ents,-howeverthe general picture is still suggests that streamwise vortices inhabit the wall region rather suggestive rather than conclusive. Some proposals are although they do not necessarily occur in counter-rotating offered as means of interacting with and/or interrupting the pairs. By using the velocity correlation in the wall region from sequence of these events in the wall region. . direct numerical simulations, Moser and Moin(1984) have argued that since R (Az) does not have a minimum at y*,30, Wall layer structure single vortices must be more predominant than counterrotating pairs. Guezennec et al.(1989) have found that The eddy structure near the wall in bounded shear '', structures do not occur in pairs of equal magnitude. The flows has usually been referred to as the "bursting sequence" vortices have diameters that grow from 10 to 40'/u, and they or the "bursting phenomenon'.I This series of events, depicted migrate away from the wall during their lifetime such that in figure I, indicates their sequence of occurrence as discussed their centers range from 10 to 50v/u, from the wall. These below. It is suggested that there may be a feed back mechanism vortices may be a part of a larger vortex structure, such as a between the large scale outer eddies in the shear flow and the hairpin or horseshoe vortex, that extends further into the wall layer events which may be important in attempts to logarithmic region; in which case, the streamwise vortices manipulate this structure. would be composed of some w Yand w as well as w .No evidence is presently available to indicale the length oA" the Streamwise Vortices vortices and their origin remains a mystery. The existence of streamwise vortices in the near wall Low Speed Streaks region has been conjectured by many authors. In its simplest hypothetical case, these vortices appear as vortex tubes aligned The low speed streaks(denoted as LSS) are the most with the streamwise direction as sketched by ubiquitous aspect of the bursting processand were rirststudied Blackwelder(1978). Kline et al.(1967) assumed such vortices by Kline et al.(1967). An experimental observation of the low existed within the flow field. Kim et al.(1971) showed some speed streaks is shown in figure 2. The data were taken by a hydrogen bubble visualization photographs that had rotation spanwise hot-wire rake at y*=15 in a turbulent boundary layer. consistent with streamwise vortices with the vortices inclined The time record from the twelve sensors has been converted to away from the wall. Bakewell and Lumley(1967) and more a streamwise spatial distance by Taylor's hypothesis to provide recently Aubry et al.( 1988) used the proper orthoganal a continuous record over 0<x*<4000. Constant velocity decomposition in the near wall region and determined that a contours for u(x,z) k[U(y) urm(y)| are plotted for k = -I pair of counter-rotating streamwise vortices containing the and -2. The lower speed fluid appears inside the elongated largest amount of energy. Lee, et al. measured the velocity regions which have spanwise scales of typically 20v/u and gradients on the wall and ascribed their results to alternating streamwise scales of several hundred viscous scales. The 'ITA regions of streamwise vorticity. Blackwelder and technique was applied to the same data and its detection Eckelmann( 1979) measured the two stress components on the locations are also indicated. Note that the technique picks up wall and found that the most probable stress pattern conformed the strong shear layers at the sides of the streaks and has a to counter-rotating vortices also. Smith and Schwartz(1983) preference for locations where there is a strong spanwise photographed hydrogen bubbles in the y-z 2 plane and found velocity. The significance of this observation is still under significant streamwise rotation in the wall region for y*<10. investigation. A similar plot of the streaks in figure 3a is from They observed frequent counter-rotating structures and the numerical data of the Center for Turbulence suggested that they were associated with the low speed streaks. Research/NASA Ames supplied by Robinson(1988). Moin and Kim(1982) showed that neither the v, w. nor the pressure had an elongated streaky Structure anywhere in the wall region. I. In the earliest research on the subject, this structure was However the vorticity displays a streaky structure due to its referred to simply as a "burst' as in Kline et al.(1967). In view strong teu/z gcadients as seen in figure 3bs of our increased knowledge, it is more descriptive to use the term "burst' only as an adjective in describing this sequence of A simplified sketch of the low speed streaks is found events. in figure 4. The streaks are shown with equal spacing in the spanwise direction but in nature they have a random spanwise 2. The usual boundary layer coordinates Of xy and z with the distribution. Also the streaks meander during their downstream velocity components u, v and w will be used in the streamwise, migration. This motion has deliberately been eliminated to normal and spanwise directions, respectively, simplify the figure although may be important in the production of turbulence. Lee et a1.(1974) found that their 'Professor Amost probable spacing is 80/u. and their average spacing is o oAerospce Engineering-Associate Fellow AIAA 100/u, very near the wall. Talmon et al.(1986) showed that their average width is only 20-40u/u,. Nakagawa and Nezu(1981) suggested that the spanwise spacing, AV is Copyright © 9199 by the American Institute of Aeronautics lognormal and showed that the spacing increased as one and A tronautics. Ic. No copyright is asserted in the approached the logarithmic region. In one of the more United States under rile 17, U.S. Code. The U.S. Governcomprehensive studies of these eddies, Smith and ment has a royalty.free license to exercise all rights under Metzler(1983) found that the streaks prsisted for At 500 the copyright claimed herein for Governmental purposes. on the average but times up to 2500-/u, were observed. Even All other rights are reserved by the copyright owner. with a moderate convection velocity of 5u . this observation will be enveloped by an inflection surface. Thus it is useful to indicates that the streaks are several thousand viscous scales think of this surface as surrounding the low speed regions of long. They also showed that the structure of the LSSs is fluid. The stochastic nature of the flow indicates that the independent of the Reynolds number over the range inflectional surfaces are random in space and time. Of course 700<Re <5800 agreeing with the data compiled from different the surfaces can end in the fluid where the inflectional profiles investigators by Hirata et al.(1982). no longer exist. The origin of the streaks is still unknown. Assuming The inflectional U(y) profiles have been observed by the streamwise vortices exist on the scales indicated above, many investigators. Kim et al.(1971) found that the U"(y)=0 their induced motion could be sufficient to explain the was a common feature of all cases of lift up observed. observation of the streaks. Since the streaks lie in a region of Willmarth and Lu(1972) found that the bursting phenomenon strong velocity gradient, the streamwise vorticity need not be occurred when the velocity profile first became inflectional. very strong to create the streaks. An alternative suggestion is Grass( 1971 ), Kline et a.(1967), Blackwelder and Kaplan(1976) that the streaks are a manifestation of the strong shear in the and others have concurred. wall region. Lee et al.(1987) showed that when homogeneous turbulence was subjected to a strong uniform shear comparable An Instability Mechanism and Oscillations to that found in the wall region, low speed streaks resulted. This mechanism would also amplify the existing w due to The importance of the inflectional profiles is that they stretching and hence the streaky structure may "still be seem to set up the necessary conditions for an inviscid Kelvinassociated with w eddies. Streaks have also been observed by Helmholtz instability within the fluid. Michalke(1965) has Nakagawa and i"ezu( 1981) and Smith and Metzler(1983) to analyzed this problem in detail for the hyperbolic tangent merge and divide in the wall region, however this happens profile with a spatial scale of A. He found that the most rapidly infrequently and can not be considered as a generation growing disturbance had a wavelength of 14A and the growth mechanism. Chu and Falco(1988) have suggested that small rates of the linear instability are extremely large. Michalke's eddies moving toward the wall may generate the LSSs. results apply to a flow field that is parallel, steady and twodimensional, but Blackwelder and Swearingen(1989) have Lift-up of the LSSs shown that these constraints are satisfied for the inflections within the wall region. Another factor that could influence the At some point in the bursting process, the low speed results from Michalke's theory is the proximity of the wall. streaks are lifted up away from the wall. This is described by Huerre(1983) has shown that Michalke's results are unaffected Klineetal.(1967)as a gradual process during which the streaks as long as the wall is more that l.2A away from the wall. marked with hydrogen bubbles appear to become thinner as Nishioka et al.(1980) support this result. they move away from the wall. Based upon motion p
[1]
W. Willmarth,et al.
Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall
,
1972,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[2]
David G. Bogard,et al.
Wall-layer structure and drag reduction
,
1985,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[3]
David G. Bogard,et al.
Burst detection with single-point velocity measurements
,
1986,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[4]
J. Anders,et al.
LEBU drag reduction in high Reynolds number boundary layers. [Large Eddy Break-Up]
,
1989
.
[5]
John Kim,et al.
On the shape and dynamics of wall structures in turbulent channel flow
,
1989
.
[6]
R. D. Watson,et al.
Airfoil large-eddy breakup devices for turbulent drag reduction
,
1985
.
[7]
W. G. Tiederman,et al.
Turbulent structure in low-concentration drag-reducing channel flows
,
1988,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[8]
Dennis M. Bushnell,et al.
Turbulent drag reduction for external flows
,
1983
.
[9]
John L. Lumley,et al.
Drag Reduction by Additives
,
1969
.
[10]
T. J. Hanratty,et al.
The influence of drag-reducing polymers on turbulence in the viscous sublayer
,
1972,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[11]
A visual study of turbulent shear flow
,
1973
.
[12]
John L. Lumley,et al.
Viscous Sublayer and Adjacent Wall Region in Turbulent Pipe Flow
,
1967
.
[13]
P. Moin,et al.
Numerical investigation of turbulent channel flow
,
1981,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[14]
W. G. Tiederman,et al.
Timescale and structure of ejections and bursts in turbulent channel flows
,
1987,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[15]
S. P. Wilkinson,et al.
Direct Drag and Hot-Wire Measurements on Thin-Element Riblet Arrays
,
1988
.
[16]
T. J. Hanratty,et al.
Identification of turbulent wall eddies through the phase relation of the components of the fluctuating velocity gradient
,
1974,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[17]
Nadine Aubry,et al.
The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer
,
1988,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[18]
Stephen J. Kline,et al.
The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer
,
1971,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[19]
Wolf-Ernst Reif,et al.
On the Drag Reduction of the Shark Skin
,
1985
.
[20]
Philippe R. Spalart,et al.
Scaling of the bursting frequency in turbulent boundary layers at low Reynolds numbers
,
1987
.
[21]
M. Landahl,et al.
Dynamics of boundary layer turbulence and the mechanism of drag reduction
,
1977
.
[22]
John B. Anders,et al.
Large eddy breakup devices as low Reynolds number airfoils
,
1986
.
[23]
N. Kasagi,et al.
HEAT TRANSFER IN TURBULENT FLOWS
,
1982
.
[24]
H. Liepmann,et al.
Active control of laminar-turbulent transition
,
1982,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[25]
C R Smith,et al.
The effects of cylindrical surface modifications on turbulent boundary layers
,
1985
.
[26]
Ron F. Blackwelder,et al.
On the wall structure of the turbulent boundary layer
,
1976,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[27]
R. Narasimha,et al.
Blade Manipulators in Channel Flow
,
1988
.
[28]
P. Moin,et al.
Turbulence structure at high shear rate
,
1987
.
[29]
Ron F. Blackwelder,et al.
Streamwise vortices associated with the bursting phenomenon
,
1979,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[30]
Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.
Selective suction for controlling bursting events in a boundary layer
,
1989
.
[31]
C. R. Smith,et al.
Turbulent Boundary-Layer Modification by Surface Riblets
,
1986
.
[32]
Roddam Narasimha,et al.
The ‘bursting’ phenomenon in a turbulent boundary layer
,
1971,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[33]
R. E. Falco,et al.
Vortex ring/viscous wall layer interaction model of the turbulence production process near walls
,
1988
.
[34]
A. Michalke.
On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer
,
1965,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[35]
John L. Lumley,et al.
Turbulent Drag Reduction by Polymer Additives: A Survey
,
1985
.
[36]
W. G. Tiederman,et al.
Spatial structure of the viscous sublayer in drag‐reducing channel flows
,
1975
.
[37]
Parviz Moin,et al.
Direct numerical simulation of curved turbulent channel flow
,
1984
.
[38]
C. R. Smith,et al.
Observation of streamwise rotation in the near‐wall region of a turbulent boundary layer
,
1983
.
[39]
Iehisa Nezu,et al.
Structure of space-time correlations of bursting phenomena in an open-channel flow
,
1981,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[40]
C. R. Smith,et al.
The characteristics of low-speed streaks in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer
,
1983,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[41]
R. Blackwelder,et al.
Modification of large eddies in turbulent boundary layers
,
1990,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[42]
F. A. Schraub,et al.
The structure of turbulent boundary layers
,
1967,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[43]
W. Willmarth,et al.
Study of turbulent structure with hot wires smaller than the viscous length
,
1984,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[44]
M. S. Acarlar,et al.
A study of hairpin vortices in a laminar boundary layer. Part 1. Hairpin vortices generated by a hemisphere protuberance
,
1987,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[45]
A. Grass.
Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries
,
1971,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
[46]
D. A. Shah,et al.
Scaling of the ‘‘bursting’’ period in turbulent boundary layer and duct flows
,
1989
.
[47]
Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.
Simulation of large-eddy structures in a turbulent boundary layer
,
1987
.
[48]
Arne V. Johansson,et al.
Time scales in turbulent channel flow
,
1984
.
[49]
D. M. Bushnell,et al.
Turbulent drag reduction research at NASA langley: progress and plans☆
,
1988
.
[50]
Simultaneous flow visualization and Reynolds-stress measurement in a turbulent boundary layer
,
1986
.
[51]
M. Nishioka,et al.
An experimental investigation of the secondary instability
,
1980
.
[52]
Philippe R. Spalart,et al.
Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to R(sub)(theta)= 1410
,
1986
.
[53]
Donald M. McEligot,et al.
Laterally converging flow. Part 2. Temporal wall shear stress
,
1983,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics.