Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds

SUMMARY Although the forces required to support the body mass are not elevated when moving up an incline, kinematic studies, in vivo tendon and bone studies and kinetic studies suggest there is a shift in forces from the fore- to the hindlimbs in quadrupeds. However, there are no whole-animal kinetic measurements of incline locomotion. Based on previous related research, we hypothesized that there would be a shift in forces to the hindlimb. The present study measured the force produced by the fore- and hindlimbs of horses while trotting over a range of speeds (2.5 to 5 m s–1) on both level and up an inclined (10%) surface. On the level, forelimb peak forces increased with trotting speed, but hindlimb peak force remained constant. On the incline, both fore- and hindlimb peak forces increased with speed, but the sum of the peak forces was lower than on the level. On the level, over the range of speeds tested, total force was consistently distributed between the limbs as 57% forelimb and 43% hindlimb, similar to the weight distribution of the horses during static weight tests. On the incline, the force distribution during locomotion shifted to 52% forelimb and 48% hindlimb. Time of contact and duty factor decreased with speed for both limbs. Time of contact was longer for the forelimb than the hindlimb, a finding not previously reported for quadrupeds. Time of contact of both limbs tended to be longer when traveling up the incline than on the level, but duty factor for both limbs was similar under both conditions. Duty factor decreased slightly with increased speed for the hindlimb on the level, and the corresponding small, predicted increase in peak vertical force could not be detected statistically.

[1]  R. Alexander,et al.  Mechanics of locomotion of dogs (Canis familiaris) and sheep (Ovis aries). , 2009, Journal of zoology.

[2]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  A. Biewener Allometry of quadrupedal locomotion: the scaling of duty factor, bone curvature and limb orientation to body size. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  D. I. Miller,et al.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Andrew A. Biewener,et al.  Mechanics of locomotion and jumping in the horse (Equus): in vivo stress in the tibia and metatarsus , 1988 .

[6]  N. Heglund,et al.  Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait? , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Energetics of running: a new perspective , 1990, Nature.

[8]  S. Gatesy,et al.  Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans , 1991 .

[9]  C T Farley,et al.  A mechanical trigger for the trot-gallop transition in horses. , 1991, Science.

[10]  J. Roush,et al.  Effects of subject velocity on ground reaction force measurements and stance times in clinically normal horses at the walk and trot. , 1996, American journal of veterinary research.

[11]  T J Roberts,et al.  Muscular Force in Running Turkeys: The Economy of Minimizing Work , 1997, Science.

[12]  H. Schamhardt,et al.  Effects of treadmill inclination on kinematics of the trot in Dutch Warmblood horses. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[13]  A. Biewener,et al.  Muscle-tendon stresses and elastic energy storage during locomotion in the horse. , 1998, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[14]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Preferred speed and cost of transport: the effect of incline. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Time of contact and step length: the effect of limb length, running speed, load carrying and incline. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  P. Pourcelot,et al.  Effects of trotting speed on muscle activity and kinematics in saddlehorses. , 2002, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[17]  Effect of trotting speed, load and incline on hindlimb stance-phase kinematics. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[18]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus caballus , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  The energetics of the trot–gallop transition , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.