Examining the Relationship between IT Governance Software, Processes, and Business Value: A Quantitative Research Approach

What is the impact of information technology (IT) governance software on the actual processes of IT governance and through that on realizing the business value of IT? This article examines the conceptual foundations underlying this question and analyzes the available evidence based on a quantitative research approach. Using global survey-data from 41 companies that have implemented IT governance software we investigate both whether this is linked to better IT governance practices and, in a second link, to improved business value outcome. Examining each of the IT governance tool modules and considering the request, prioritize, fund, monitor, enforce, and realign processes comprising IT governance, our analysis shows that this reaction chain indeed exists. We also found that this can only be effective under certain conditions; implementation factors play a vital role, both in the improvement of IT governance processes, as well as in business value creation.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management for New Products (Управление портфелем новых продуктов) , 1998 .

[2]  Susan A. Sherer,et al.  IS project selection: the role of strategic vision and IT governance , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[3]  Kenneth G. Rau,et al.  Effective Governance of It: Design Objectives, Roles, and Relationships , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  Janis L. Gogan,et al.  A comprehensive and cohesive IT value management capability: case studies in the North Amercian life insurance industry , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[6]  Andrew Kakabadse,et al.  IS/IT governance: need for an integrated model , 2001 .

[7]  Ari Ginsberg,et al.  Connecting Diversification to Performance: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1990 .

[8]  Hauke Heier Change Paradigms in the Setting of Knowledge Management Systems , 2011 .

[9]  Robert S. Gold Building the IT Organization Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[10]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Problems, New Solutions: Making Portfolio Management More Effective , 2000 .

[11]  John C. Beachboard Land Management : An Interpretive Analysis of Information Technology Management within the Bureau of Land Management , 2002 .

[12]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[13]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  The Influence of Alignment on the Post-Implementation Success of a Core Banking Information System: An Embedded Case Study , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[14]  Hans P. Borgman,et al.  Examining the Relationship between IT Governance Software and Business Value of IT: Evidence from Four Case Studies , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[15]  Ryan Peterson,et al.  Crafting Information Technology Governance , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  N. Dean Meyer Systemic is Governance: An Introduction , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  G. S. Stern,et al.  Stress and Illness , 1982 .

[18]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  The implementation of expert systems: a survey of successful implementations , 1993, DATB.

[19]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[20]  Klaus D. Niemann,et al.  Von der Unternehmensarchitektur zur IT-Governance , 2005 .

[21]  J. T. M. van Der Zee,et al.  Alignment Is Not Enough: Integrating Business and Information Technology Management with the Balanced Business Scorecard , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Charles R. Franz,et al.  Obstacle coping during systems implementation , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Roger Debreceny Re-Engineering IT Internal Controls: Applying Capability Maturity Models to the Evaluation of IT Controls , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[24]  W. V. Grembergen,et al.  Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms for IT Governance , 2004 .

[25]  Michael Durst Kennzahlengestütztes Management von IT-Architekturen , 2006, HMD Prax. Wirtsch..

[26]  Mats Engwall,et al.  The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management? , 2003 .

[27]  Pieter M. A. Ribbers,et al.  Designing information technology governance processes: diagnosing contemporary practices and competing theories , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  Bill Walton,et al.  From Business Strategy to IT Action: Right Decisions for a Better Bottom Line , 2004 .

[29]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[30]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process , 1981, MIS Q..

[31]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments , 2003 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[33]  M. Jeffery,et al.  Best Practices in IT Portfolio Management , 2004 .

[34]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[35]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[38]  Robert E. Levasseur People Skills: Change Management Tools--Lewin's Change Model , 2001 .

[39]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[40]  Hans P. Borgman,et al.  Making the Most of IT Governance Software: Understanding Implementation Processes , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[41]  T. Millon,et al.  Personality and social psychology , 2003 .

[42]  Mark Lycett,et al.  Programme management: a critical review , 2004 .

[43]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Implementing Common Systems: One Organization's Experience , 2011 .

[44]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Strategy and Tactics in a Process Model of Project Implementation , 1987 .

[45]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[46]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .