Imaging cellular structures in super-resolution with SIM, STED and Localisation Microscopy: A practical comparison

Many biological questions require fluorescence microscopy with a resolution beyond the diffraction limit of light. Super-resolution methods such as Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM), STimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy and Single Molecule Localisation Microscopy (SMLM) enable an increase in image resolution beyond the classical diffraction-limit. Here, we compare the individual strengths and weaknesses of each technique by imaging a variety of different subcellular structures in fixed cells. We chose examples ranging from well separated vesicles to densely packed three dimensional filaments. We used quantitative and correlative analyses to assess the performance of SIM, STED and SMLM with the aim of establishing a rough guideline regarding the suitability for typical applications and to highlight pitfalls associated with the different techniques.

[1]  R. Zaidel-Bar,et al.  Actin-delimited adhesion-independent clustering of E-cadherin forms the nanoscale building blocks of adherens junctions. , 2015, Developmental cell.

[2]  W. Webb,et al.  Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[3]  A. Small,et al.  Fluorophore localization algorithms for super-resolution microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[4]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Live Cell Imaging: A Laboratory Manual , 2004 .

[5]  Ilan Davis,et al.  Correlative in-resin super-resolution and electron microscopy using standard fluorescent proteins , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  M. Hausmann,et al.  SPDM: light microscopy with single-molecule resolution at the nanoscale , 2008 .

[7]  M. Gustafsson.  Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Rainer Heintzmann,et al.  Laterally modulated excitation microscopy: improvement of resolution by using a diffraction grating , 1999, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[9]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[10]  H. Leonhardt,et al.  A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[12]  S. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Spindle Self-organization and Cytokinesis During Male Meiosis in asterless Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  M. Gustafsson.  Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  Samuel J. Lord,et al.  Three-dimensional, single-molecule fluorescence imaging beyond the diffraction limit by using a double-helix point spread function , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  E. Betzig,et al.  Live-cell photoactivated localization microscopy of nanoscale adhesion dynamics , 2008, Nature Methods.

[16]  J. J. Macklin,et al.  Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy with a photoswitchable protein reveals cellular structures at 50-nm resolution , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Toby D. M. Bell,et al.  Image artifacts in Single Molecule Localization Microscopy: why optimization of sample preparation protocols matters , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[18]  S. Hess,et al.  Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples , 2008, Nature Methods.

[19]  Suliana Manley,et al.  A role for actin arcs in the leading-edge advance of migrating cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  Manfred Glesner,et al.  Proceedings of the Reconfigurable Computing Is Going Mainstream, 12th International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications , 2002 .

[21]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[22]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Interferometric fluorescent super-resolution microscopy resolves 3D cellular ultrastructure , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  G. Warren,et al.  Characterization of a cis-Golgi matrix protein, GM130 , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  B. Giepmans,et al.  Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging , 2012, Nature Methods.

[25]  Kerstin Pingel,et al.  50 Years of Image Analysis , 2012 .

[26]  J. Raff,et al.  Asterless Licenses Daughter Centrioles to Duplicate for the First Time in Drosophila Embryos , 2014, Current Biology.

[27]  S. Hell,et al.  Fluorescence nanoscopy by ground-state depletion and single-molecule return , 2008, Nature Methods.

[28]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Alf Honigmann,et al.  Coaligned dual-channel STED nanoscopy and molecular diffusion analysis at 20 nm resolution. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[30]  C. Eggeling,et al.  Pathways to optical STED microscopy , 2014 .

[31]  M. Sauer,et al.  rapidSTORM: accurate, fast open-source software for localization microscopy , 2012, Nature Methods.

[32]  H. Horstmann,et al.  Mammalian Homologues of Yeast Sec31p , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  J. Raff,et al.  Drosophila Cep135/Bld10 maintains proper centriole structure but is dispensable for cartwheel formation , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[34]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  S. Hell,et al.  Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating , 2011, Nature Methods.

[36]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[37]  Hazen P. Babcock,et al.  Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton , 2011, Nature Methods.

[38]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Superresolution live imaging of plant cells using structured illumination microscopy , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[39]  Vivien Marx,et al.  Is super-resolution microscopy right for you? , 2013, Nature Methods.

[40]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy with standard fluorescent probes , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[41]  S. Bonaccorsi,et al.  The role of anillin in meiotic cytokinesis of Drosophila males. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[42]  Ian M. Dobbie,et al.  SIMcheck: a Toolbox for Successful Super-resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[43]  M. Yaspo,et al.  Primate homologues of rat TGN38: primary structure, expression and functional implications. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[44]  Mark Bates,et al.  Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging , 2011, Nature Methods.

[45]  Karel Fliegel,et al.  SIMToolbox: a MATLAB toolbox for structured illumination fluorescence microscopy , 2015, Bioinform..

[46]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[47]  D. Baddeley,et al.  Using conventional fluorescent markers for far‐field fluorescence localization nanoscopy allows resolution in the 10‐nm range , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[48]  Philip Tinnefeld,et al.  Choosing dyes for cw-STED nanoscopy using self-assembled nanorulers , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[49]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[50]  Manfred Kirchgessner,et al.  Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Reconstituted Tight Junctions Using Localization Microscopy , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Breaking the Diffraction Barrier: Super-Resolution Imaging of Cells , 2010, Cell.

[52]  Mark Bates,et al.  Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging by Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[53]  U. Aebi,et al.  The structure of the F-actin filament and the actin molecule. , 1992, Current opinion in cell biology.

[54]  S. Hell,et al.  Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  M. Davidson,et al.  Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics , 2015, Science.

[56]  Xueliang Zhu,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of ADVANCED IMAGING. Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics. , 2015 .

[57]  Mike Heilemann,et al.  Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging of proteins in the mitochondrial inner membrane with photoswitchable fluorophores. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[58]  Achilleas S Frangakis,et al.  Visualization of cell microtubules in their native state , 2007, Biology of the cell.

[59]  S Wolter,et al.  Real‐time computation of subdiffraction‐resolution fluorescence images , 2010, Journal of microscopy.

[60]  G. Banting,et al.  TGN38 and its orthologues: roles in post-TGN vesicle formation and maintenance of TGN morphology. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.