Autonomous Learning of the Semantics of Internal Sensory States Based on Motor Exploration

What is available to developmental programs in autonomous mental development, and what should be learned at the very early stages of mental development? Our observation is that sensory and motor primitives are the most basic components present at the beginning, and what developmental agents need to learn from these resources is what their internal sensory states stand for. In this paper, we investigate the question in the context of a simple biologically motivated visuomotor agent. We observe and acknowledge, as many other researchers do, that action plays a key role in providing content to the sensory state. We propose a simple, yet powerful learning criterion, that of invariance, where invariance simply means that the internal state does not change over time. We show that after reinforcement learning based on the invariance criterion, the property of action sequence based on an internal sensory state accurately reflects the property of the stimulus that triggered that internal state. That way, the meaning of the internal sensory state can be firmly grounded on the property of that particular action sequence. We expect the framing of the problem and the proposed solution presented in this paper to help shed new light on autonomous understanding in developmental agents such as humanoid robots.

[1]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Developmental robotics: a survey , 2003, Connect. Sci..

[2]  Niraj S. Desai,et al.  Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons , 1998, Nature.

[3]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Biorobotics: Methods and Applications , 2002 .

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Computational Maps in the Visual Cortex , 2005 .

[6]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[7]  A. Riegler,et al.  Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences , 1999, Springer US.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences , 1988, Machine Learning.

[10]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Contour integration and segmentation with self-organized lateral connections , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Nuttapong Chentanez,et al.  Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learning , 2004, NIPS.

[12]  P. Bach-y-Rita Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution , 1972 .

[13]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  From Schema Theory To Language , 1987 .

[14]  F. C. T. Moore,et al.  Bergson: Thinking Backwards , 1996 .

[15]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  A neurobiological theory of meaning in perception , 2003, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2003..

[16]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Alternative Essences of Intelligence , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[17]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[18]  Aline Elisabeth Dominique Bompas,et al.  Colour perception in the sensorimotor contingency theory , 2002 .

[19]  R. Walker,et al.  Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: Curved saccade trajectories , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Natural Semantics for a Mobile Robot , 1999 .

[21]  Andrew G. Barto,et al.  Reinforcement learning , 1998 .

[22]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Basic principles of the KIV model and its application to the navigation problem. , 2003, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[23]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Learning acceptable windows of contingency , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[24]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[26]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[27]  R. Hetherington The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[28]  A. Riegler,et al.  Understanding representation in the cognitive sciences : does representation need reality? , 1999 .

[29]  George Kampis,et al.  The Natural History of Agents , 2022 .

[30]  P. Bach-y-Rita Tactile Sensory Substitution Studies , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Inverse kinematics for humanoid robots , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[32]  J. Kevin O'Regan,et al.  Perception of the Structure of the Physical World Using Unknown Multimodal Sensors and Effectors , 2003, NIPS.

[33]  P. Bach-y-Rita Tactile vision substitution: past and future. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[34]  A. Lansner,et al.  The cortex as a central pattern generator , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Edmund T. Rolls Representations In The Brain , 2004, Synthese.

[36]  Yoonsuck Choe,et al.  Motion-Based Autonomous Grounding: Inferring External World Properties from Encoded Internal Sensory States Alone , 2006, AAAI.

[37]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[38]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[39]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[40]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Common codes for situated interaction , 2001 .

[41]  Yoonsuck Choe,et al.  Co-development of Visual Receptive Fields and Their Motor Primitive-based Decoding Scheme , 2007 .

[42]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Learning from delayed rewards , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[43]  E. Marder,et al.  Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. , 1996, Physiological reviews.

[44]  E. Rolls Representation in the brain , 2001 .

[45]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[46]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[47]  Yoonsuck Choe,et al.  Autonomous Acquisition of the Meaning of Sensory States Through Sensory-Invariance Driven Action , 2004, BioADIT.

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[49]  R. Beer Dynamical approaches to cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  T. J. Sullivan,et al.  Homeostatic synaptic scaling in self-organizing maps , 2006, Neural Networks.

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals , 2001, Science.

[52]  J. Kevin O'Regan,et al.  Is There Something Out There? Inferring Space from Sensorimotor Dependencies , 2003, Neural Computation.

[53]  A. J. Bell,et al.  Levels and loops: the future of artificial intelligence and neuroscience. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[54]  M. Bensafi,et al.  Olfactomotor activity during imagery mimics that during perception , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Yves Frégnac,et al.  Neurobiology: Homeostasis or synaptic plasticity? , 1998, Nature.

[56]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[57]  R. Bishop,et al.  Tensor Analysis on Manifolds , 1980 .

[58]  Michael H. Bowling,et al.  Action respecting embedding , 2005, ICML.

[59]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Computational models of visual neurons specialised in the detection of periodic and aperiodic oriented visual stimuli: bar and grating cells , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[60]  R. Held,et al.  MOVEMENT-PRODUCED STIMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[61]  Robert Platt,et al.  Nullspace composition of control laws for grasping , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[62]  Juyang Weng,et al.  Developmental Robotics: Theory and Experiments , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[63]  J. Mandler How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system☆ , 1988 .

[64]  J. Wilder The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1954 .

[65]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[66]  G. Turrigiano Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: the more things change, the more they stay the same , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[67]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Map Learning with Uninterpreted Sensors and Effectors , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[68]  P. Roland,et al.  I Feel My Hand Moving A New Role of the Primary Motor Cortex in Somatic Perception of Limb Movement , 2002, Neuron.

[69]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex—An Update Time Is of the Essence , 2001, Neuron.

[70]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Learning Lie Groups for Invariant Visual Perception , 1998, NIPS.