Prognostic indicators and outcome prediction model for severe traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND Although some predictive models for patient outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury have been proposed, a mathematical model with high predictive value has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the most important indicators of prognosis and to develop the best outcome prediction model. METHODS One hundred eleven consecutive patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <9 were examined and 14 factors were evaluated. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure were recorded at admission to the intensive care unit. The absence of the basal cisterns, presence of extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage, and degree of midline shift were evaluated by means of computed tomography within 24 hours after injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for a poor prognosis and to develop the best prediction model. RESULTS The best model included the following variables: age (p < 0.01), light reflex (p = 0.01), extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage (p = 0.01), intracranial pressure (p = 0.04), and midline shift (p = 0.12). Positive predictive value of the model was 97.3%, negative predictive value was 87.1%, and overall predictive value was 94.2%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.977, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was 0.866. CONCLUSIONS Our predictive model based on age, absence of light reflex, presence of extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial pressure, and midline shift was shown to have high predictive value and will be useful for decision making, review of treatment, and family counseling in case of traumatic brain injury.

[1]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[2]  A. Harders,et al.  Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and its treatment with nimodipine. German tSAH Study Group. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Some prognostic models for traumatic brain injury were not valid. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Foss Mv MANAGEMENT OF VIRUS HEPATITIS. , 1964 .

[6]  Vincent Corruble,et al.  Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Mortality from traumatic brain injury. , 2005, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[8]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  L. Pitts,et al.  Predicting survival from head trauma 24 hours after injury: a practical method with therapeutic implications. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  O. Tasaki,et al.  CEREBROSPINAL FLUID CONCENTRATIONS OF ANTI-INFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS IN EARLY-PHASE SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY , 2005, Shock.

[11]  J M Wardlaw,et al.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  A. Rovlias,et al.  Classification and regression tree for prediction of outcome after severe head injury using simple clinical and laboratory variables. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.