Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment

PurposeFrom a management perspective, there are two main issues in the life cycle sustainability assessment framework which require further work: (1) the approaches to quicken the resource-consuming inventory and assessment process and (2) the easy-to-understand communication of the results. This study aims at contributing to these needs for quicker and cost-efficient ways to draft strategies that include the life cycle perspective and encompasses all three dimensions of sustainability in an easily communicable way. The focus of the study is on a streamlined, rapid assessment the tool proposed by Pesonen (2007) called the Sustainability SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) and on the empirical testing of whether or not it is understood in the corporate world and if it leads to concrete changes in either strategic- or operative-level activities.MethodsThe data for the research were empirically collected from a survey targeted to representatives of organizations having used the Sustainability SWOT within the last 5 years. The primary findings, i.e., the generated changes or improvements, were reflected in the various levels of cooperation in a network (along the value chain, in end users, in the institutional framework).Results and discussionThe results of the analyses of both the usability of the Sustainability SWOT in business as well as the suggested assessment framework leading to any actual changes were promising. It is encouraging that the streamlined approach tailored according to the logic of business decision-makers (i.e., inclusion of the SWOT) is able to find the acceptance and understanding of that vital group. Remarkably, many changes were initiated—not only at an operative level but also at a strategic level and in the entire value chain—by carrying out an exercise such as the Sustainability SWOT.ConclusionsThe Sustainability SWOT has proven to be usable and able to generate changes and improvements along the value chain and, in some cases, in the institutional context as well.

[1]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? , 2010 .

[2]  Han Brezet,et al.  Ecodesign : a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption , 1997 .

[3]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[4]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[5]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[6]  Kwang-Kyu Seo,et al.  Approximate life cycle assessment of classified products using artificial neural network and statistical analysis in conceptual product design , 2001, Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[7]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Evaluation of two simplified Life Cycle assessment methods , 2003 .

[8]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[9]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production , 2008 .

[10]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant - Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (3 pp) , 2005 .

[11]  Frank Schlüter On the integration of environmental aspects into early product development , 2001 .

[12]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  Climate Change: What's Your Business Strategy? , 2008 .

[13]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective , 2009 .

[14]  Carolyn C. Pertsova,et al.  Ecological economics research trends , 2007 .

[15]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life-Cycle Based Sustainability Assessment of Products , 2008 .

[16]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[17]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  The Hitch Hiker´s Guide to LCA - An orientation in LCA methodology and application , 2006 .

[18]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[19]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[21]  Matthias Schulz,et al.  A streamlined sustainability assessment tool for improved decision making in the urban water industry , 2012, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[22]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products , 2011 .

[23]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Resource intensity in global food chains : the hot spot analysis , 2010 .

[25]  F. Schmidt‐bleek Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch , 1994 .

[26]  Tim C. McAloone,et al.  Environmental improvement through product development: A guide , 2009 .

[27]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  The Role of SETAC in the Development of LCA , 2006 .

[28]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Application dependency of lca methodology: Key variables and their mode of influencing the method , 1998 .

[29]  Michael Lettenmeier,et al.  Sustainability hot spot analysis : a streamlined life cycle assessment towards sustainable food chains , 2010 .

[30]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .