Quantification of edema reduction using differential quantitative T2 (DQT2) relaxometry mapping in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab

The purpose of the current study was to quantify the reduction in T2 signal abnormality accompanying administration of the anti-angiogenic drug bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients using a voxel-wise differential quantitative T2 (DQT2) mapping technique. Twenty-six patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab were scanned before and 4–6 weeks after treatment on a 1.5T clinical MR scanner. Quantitative T2 maps were created from proton density and T2-weighted images acquired using a standard multi-echo fast-spin echo sequence. T2 maps after treatment were co-registered with T2 maps prior to treatment in the same patient, and then voxel-wise subtraction was performed to create DQT2 maps for each patient. Results suggest DQT2 maps allow visualization and quantification of voxel-wise T2 changes resulting from anti-VEGF therapy. Results demonstrated a significant decrease in T2 within pre-treatment T2 abnormal regions (mean reduction = 49.4 ms at 1.5T) following anti-VEGF treatment (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < 0.0001). An elevated residual, post-treatment, median T2 was predictive of both progression-free (Log-rank, P = 0.0074) and overall survival (Log-rank, P = 0.0393).

[1]  V. Tombolini,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma in elderly patients , 2008, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  K Tsuchiya,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR in the diagnosis of intracranial tumors. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Kathleen M. Schmainda,et al.  Comparison of cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic treatment responses using functional diffusion maps in FLAIR abnormal regions , 2009 .

[4]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Efficacy, safety and patterns of response and recurrence in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[6]  B A Kall,et al.  Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. , 1999, Science.

[8]  Albert Lai,et al.  Time course of imaging changes of GBM during extended bevacizumab treatment , 2008, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  P. Wen,et al.  Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas , 2008, Neurology.

[10]  Georg Breier,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Developmental and Tumor Angiogenesis , 1994, Brain pathology.

[11]  Wei Chen,et al.  Predicting treatment response of malignant gliomas to bevacizumab and irinotecan by imaging proliferation with [18F] fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: a pilot study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Darell D. Bigner,et al.  Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Recurrent Malignant Glioma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Functional diffusion map as an early imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma: correlation with conventional radiologic response and overall survival. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R L Ehman,et al.  Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy. , 1988, Radiology.

[16]  S. Nelson,et al.  Bevacizumab and chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma , 2009, Neurology.

[17]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma , 2009, Neurology.

[18]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  MR imaging correlates of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan for recurrent high‐grade glial tumors , 2008, Cancer.

[20]  T. Byrne,et al.  Imaging of gliomas. , 1994, Seminars in oncology.

[21]  H. Köstler,et al.  Diagnostic value of the fast-FLAIR sequence in MR imaging of intracranial tumors , 2000, European Radiology.

[22]  M. Battaglini,et al.  Voxel-based assessment of differences in damage and distribution of white matter lesions between patients with primary progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[23]  P. Wen,et al.  A "vascular normalization index" as potential mechanistic biomarker to predict survival after a single dose of cediranib in recurrent glioblastoma patients. , 2009, Cancer research.

[24]  Ucla Medical MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy , 2006 .

[25]  B A Kall,et al.  Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms. , 1987, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[26]  H. Mehdorn,et al.  Expression of VEGF and its receptors in different brain tumors , 2005, Neurological research.

[27]  M Brant-Zawadzki,et al.  Magnetic resonance of the brain: the optimal screening technique. , 1984, Radiology.

[28]  Matthew S. Brown,et al.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment. , 2009, Radiology.

[29]  P. LaViolette,et al.  Volumetric analysis of functional diffusion maps is a predictive imaging biomarker for cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic treatments in malignant gliomas , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[30]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  J. Uhm Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group , 2010 .

[32]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  J Debus,et al.  Fast fluid‐attenuated inversion‐recovery (FLAIR) MRI in the assessment of intraaxial brain tumors , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[34]  R. Tanaka,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of cerebral gliomas , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[35]  A. Mackay,et al.  In vivo measurement of T2 distributions and water contents in normal human brain , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  P. LaViolette,et al.  Validation of functional diffusion maps (fDMs) as a biomarker for human glioma cellularity , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  X Golay,et al.  MR imaging of the human brain at 1.5 T: regional variations in transverse relaxation rates in the cerebral cortex. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[38]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Quantitative volumetric analysis of conventional MRI response in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[39]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  The parametric response map is an imaging biomarker for early cancer treatment outcome , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[40]  P. Kelly,et al.  High-grade glioma before and after treatment with radiation and Avastin: initial observations. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[41]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  VEGF-targeted cancer therapy strategies: current progress, hurdles and future prospects. , 2007, Trends in molecular medicine.

[42]  Bradford A Moffat,et al.  Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.