Limited cognitive adjustments in signed networks

Abstract Under the auspices of structural balance theory, the individuals in signed social networks will adjust their relations with their neighbours to reduce the stress induced by imbalanced triangles. In small networks individuals may be able to observe the impact of their adjustments upon the global balance of the network. But in larger networks this will not prove feasible, their local adjustments will only respond to their immediate neighbourhoods. Furthermore, adjustments may only centre upon the more important neighbours. We study whether limited cognition (i.e. variations in the number of important neighbours) affects the convergence of generated networks to balance. We find that limited cognition adjustment can drive the complete networks to global balance as long as the number of recognized neighbours exceeds an even number critical value. But under relaxed increase requirement, the complete network will go global balance only if the number (even number) of recognized neighbours exceeds a critical value. Critical values varies with network size, network density (d) and the initial ratio of positive links. But for incomplete network, less links among node will thwart the network converge to global balance. The sparser the incomplete network is and the lower ratio of initial positive edges, the harder for the network to converge to global balance. Some special imbalance substructures like the attractors can prevent the incomplete network to global balance. The experimental in a real email network also verify this results.

[1]  Peter Abell,et al.  An evolutionary model of social networks , 2007 .

[2]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Some dynamics of social balance processes: bringing Heider back into balance theory , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[3]  Robert D. Kleinberg,et al.  Continuous-time model of structural balance , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[5]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[6]  Krzysztof Kulakowski,et al.  Towards the Heider balance with a cellular automaton , 2020, 2005.11402.

[7]  K. Kułakowski,et al.  Heider balance of a chain of actors as dependent on the interaction range and a thermal noise , 2020, 2008.06362.

[8]  Harold Miller,et al.  Structural Balance in Dyads. , 1972 .

[9]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Structural balance and the induction of relations1 , 1967 .

[10]  Nicholas Harrigan,et al.  Why does everybody hate me? Balance, status, and homophily: The triumvirate of signed tie formation , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[11]  Jeffrey R. Stevens,et al.  Is Cooperative Memory Special? The Role of Costly Errors, Context, and Social Network Size When Remembering Cooperative Actions , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[12]  Amiyaal Ilany,et al.  Structural balance in the social networks of a wild mammal , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  James Stiller,et al.  Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[14]  K. Kułakowski,et al.  The Heider balance - a continuous approach , 2005, physics/0501073.

[15]  P. Doreian,et al.  A partitioning approach to structural balance , 1996 .

[16]  J. Davis Structural Balance, Mechanical Solidarity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  S. H. Davol,et al.  An empirical test of structural balance in sociometric triads. , 1959, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[18]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  The Structural Balance Theory of Sentiment Networks: Elaboration and Test , 2017, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  Pre‐transitive balance mechanisms for signed networks , 2001 .

[20]  Peter Abell,et al.  A study of sign adjustment in weighted signed networks , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[21]  James D. Montgomery,et al.  Balance Theory with Incomplete Awareness , 2009 .

[22]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[23]  Peter Abell,et al.  A Study of Local Sign Change Adjustment in Balancing Structures , 2010 .

[24]  Jeffrey R. Stevens,et al.  The Good, the Bad, and the Rare: Memory for Partners in Social Interactions , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  M. Hallinan,et al.  A Stochastic Model for Change in Group Structure , 1976 .

[26]  M. Hauser,et al.  Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Ralph E. Cooper,et al.  Examination of Newcomb's extension of structural balance theory. , 1973 .

[28]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  Mitigation of malicious attacks on structural balance of signed networks , 2020, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[29]  M. Hallinan,et al.  Structural Effects on Dyadic Change , 1980 .

[30]  K. Opp Balance Theory: Progress and Stagnation of a Social Psychological Theory , 1984 .

[31]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Forgetting Constrains the Emergence of Cooperative Decision Strategies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[32]  Yuejin Tan,et al.  The influence of structural balance and homophily/heterophobia on the adjustment of random complete signed networks , 2016, Soc. Networks.

[33]  Julian O. Morrissette,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Theory of Structural Balance , 1958 .

[34]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Heider's structural balance principle as a conceptual rule. , 1975 .

[36]  A. van de Rijt,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Journal of Mathematical Sociology the Micro-macro Link for the Theory of Structural Balance the Micro-macro Link for the Theory of Structural Balance , 2022 .