A comparison of paired histogram, maximum likelihood, class elimination, and neural network approaches for daylight global cloud classification using AVHRR imagery

The accuracy and efficiency of four approaches to identifying clouds and aerosols in remote sensing imagery are compared. These approaches are as follows: a maximum likelihood classifier, a paired histogram technique, a hybrid class elimination approach, and a back-propagation neural network. Regional comparisons were conducted on advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) local area coverage (LAC) scenes from the polar regions, desert areas, and regions of biomass-burning, areas which are known to be particularly difficult. For the polar, desert, and biomass burning regions, the maximum likelihood classifier achieved 94–97% accuracy, the neural network achieved 95–96% accuracy, and the paired histogram approach achieved 93–94% accuracy. The primary advantage to the class elimination scheme lies in its speed; its accuracy of 94–96% is comparable to that of the maximum likelihood classifier. Experiments also clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of decomposing a single global classifier into separate regional classifiers, since the regional classifiers can be more finely tuned to recognize local conditions. In addition, the effectiveness of using composite features is compared to the simpler approach of using the five AVHRR channels and the reflectance of channel 3 treated as a sixth channel as the elements of the feature vector. The results varied, demonstrating that the features cannot be chosen independently of the classifier to be used. It is also shown that superior results can obtained by training the classifiers using subclass information and collapsing the subclasses after classification. Finally, ancillary data were incorporated into the classifiers, consisting of a land/water mask, a terrain map, and a computed sunglint probability. While the neural network did not benefit from this information, the accuracy of the maximum likelihood classifier improved by 1%, and the accuracy of the paired histogram method increased by up to 4%.

[1]  C.R.N. Rao,et al.  Calibration and characterization of the post-launch performance of the visible and near-infrared channels of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on board the NOAA-7, -9, and -11 spacecraft , 1995, 1995 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS '95. Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications.

[2]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Diurnal Variability of Regional Cloud and Clear-Sky Radiative Parameters Derived from GOES Data. Part I: Analysis Method , 1984 .

[3]  Toshiro Inoue,et al.  A cloud type classification with NOAA 7 split‐window measurements , 1987 .

[4]  Geneviève Sèze,et al.  Effects of satellite data resolution on measuring the space/time variations of surfaces and clouds , 1991 .

[5]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[6]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Measuring cloud properties from space: a review , 1989 .

[7]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[8]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery , 1995 .

[9]  Philip A. Durkee,et al.  Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements , 1990 .

[10]  J. Coakley,et al.  Towards the objective analysis of clouds from satellite imagery data , 1984 .

[11]  Michael P. Weinreb,et al.  Nonlinearity corrections in calibration of advanced very high resolution radiometer infrared channels , 1990 .

[12]  W. Rossow,et al.  Cloud Detection Using Satellite Measurements of Infrared and Visible Radiances for ISCCP , 1993 .

[13]  F. Bretherton,et al.  Cloud cover from high-resolution scanner data - Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view , 1982 .

[14]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  An intercomparison of artificial intelligence approaches for polar scene identification , 1993 .

[15]  K. Kidwell NOAA polar orbiter data (TIROS-N, NOAA-6, NOAA-7, NOAA-8, NOAA-9, and NOAA-10) users guide , 1986 .

[16]  A. Lacis,et al.  Global, seasonal cloud variations from satellite radiance measurements. I: Sensitivity of analysis , 1989 .

[17]  Jianhua Chen,et al.  Calibration of the visible and near-infrared channels of the advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) after launch , 1993, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[18]  C. Long,et al.  Global distribution of cloud cover derived from NOAA/AVHRR operational satellite data , 1991 .

[19]  W. Munk,et al.  Measurement of the Roughness of the Sea Surface from Photographs of the Sun’s Glitter , 1954 .

[20]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Technique for Distinguishing Surface and Cloud Types in the Polar Regions , 1987 .

[21]  C. Rao,et al.  Degradation of the visible and near-infrared channels of the advanced very high resolution radiometer on the NOAA-9 spacecraft : assessment and recommendations for corrections , 1993 .

[22]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Global, Seasonal Surface Variations from Satellite Radiance Measurements , 1989 .

[23]  Robert J. Curran,et al.  Thin cirrus clouds - Seasonal distribution over oceans deduced from Nimbus-4 IRIS , 1988 .

[24]  T. F. Eck,et al.  Cloud-screening for Africa using a geographically and seasonally variable infrared threshold , 1991 .

[25]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Polar Cloud and Surface Classification Using AVHRR Imagery: An Intercomparison of Methods , 1992 .

[26]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Satellite Remote Sensing of Multiple Cloud Layers , 1995 .

[27]  Josef Cihlar,et al.  Detection and removal of cloud contamination from AVHRR images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Thomas H. Vonder Haar,et al.  A Bispectral Method for Cloud Parameter Determination , 1977 .

[29]  J. Key,et al.  Cloud cover analysis with Arctic Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer data: 2. Classification with spectral and textural measures , 1990 .

[30]  P. Rabindra,et al.  An interactive hybrid expert system for polar cloud and surface classification , 1992 .

[31]  A. Arking Latitudinal Distribution of Cloud Cover from Tiros III Photographs , 1964, Science.

[32]  S. Sengupta,et al.  Cloud and surface textural features in polar regions , 1990 .

[33]  Roger G. Barry,et al.  Cloud cover analysis with Arctic AVHRR data: 1. Cloud detection , 1989 .

[34]  Robert H. Evans,et al.  Calibration of advanced very high resolution radiometer infrared channels: A new approach to nonlinear correction , 1993 .

[35]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[36]  Dan Tarpley,et al.  Cloud screening for determination of land surface characteristics in a reduced resolution satellite data set , 1987 .

[37]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  Analysis of Polar Clouds from Satellite Imagery Using Pattern Recognition and a Statistical Cloud Analysis Scheme , 1989 .

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[39]  Robert P. d'Entremont Low- and Midlevel Cloud Analysis Using Nighttime Multispectral Imagery , 1986 .

[40]  C. Rao,et al.  Post-launch calibration of the visible and near-infrared channels of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer on the NOAA-14 spacecraft , 1996 .