A Framework for Electronic Reverse Auction (eRA) Research

ABSTRACT After nearly two decades, electronic reserve auction (eRA) continues to be a widely-used eProcurement tool. Buyers report that eRA helps them reap savings in cost and procurement time and expands the pool of eligible suppliers. Suppliers point out reduced operating, selling or customer acquisition costs, a more level playing field, and access to new markets. However, questions have been raised about the actual benefits of eRA for buyers and suppliers and its potentially negative impact on buyer-supplier relationships. Given the controversy over the nature of the outcomes actually achieved with eRA, more research is needed to provide insights that can guide buyers and suppliers toward effective use of eRA. To this end, this paper identifies independent variables which impact electronic reverse auction outcomes, intervening process variables related to the way eRA is implemented, and outcome variables that are important to buyers and suppliers who use eRA. The variables are mapped onto a framework, and future research directions related to these variables are discussed.

[1]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Regulating B2B online reverse auctions through voluntary codes of conduct , 2005 .

[2]  Brian Corbitt,et al.  A STAKEHOLDER-BENEFIT PERSPECTIVE OF REVERSE AUCTIONS , 2001 .

[3]  Martin Bichler,et al.  A roadmap to auction-based negotiation protocols for electronic commerce , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Reverse auctions--grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective , 2004 .

[5]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[6]  R. Wise,et al.  Beyond the exchange--the future of B2B. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[7]  A. Nair Emerging internet‐enabled auction mechanisms in supply chain , 2005 .

[8]  Larry Yu,et al.  How team communication affects innovation , 2005 .

[9]  Bart J. Wilson,et al.  Collusion in Procurement Auctions: an Experimental Examination , 2002 .

[10]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[11]  Martin Bichler,et al.  RC 22478 BIDDING LANGUAGES AND WINNER DETERMINATION IN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE AUCTIONS , 2002 .

[12]  John A. List,et al.  BIDDING BEHAVIOR AND DECISION COSTS IN FIELD EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[13]  J. Kagel,et al.  Independent Private Value Auctions: Bidder Behaviour in First-, Second- and Third-Price Auctions with Varying Numbers of Bidders , 1993 .

[14]  J. Schopler Interorganizational Groups: Origins, Structure, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[15]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Running up the bid: detecting, predicting, and preventing reserve price shilling in online auctions , 2003, ICEC '03.

[16]  J. Kagel,et al.  The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment , 1999 .

[17]  Edward P. Moser E-Procurement: Successfully using and managing reverse auctions , 2002 .

[18]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Structuration Theory in the IS Field: An Assessment of Research Strategies , 2001, ECIS.

[19]  J. Kagel,et al.  Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research, 1995 - 2008* , 2008 .

[20]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Resolving Uncertainty about the Number of Bidders in Independent Private- Value Auctions: An Experimental Analysis , 1989 .

[21]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Analysis and Design of Business - to - Consumer Online Auctions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Multi‐Attribute Reverse Auctions in B2B Excahnges: A Framework for Design and Implementation , 2004 .

[23]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[24]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in , 1992 .

[25]  M. Bichler The Future of Emarkets: Multi-Dimensional Market Mechanisms , 2001 .

[26]  G. Ritzer Structuration Theory , 2007 .

[27]  M. Emiliani Business‐to‐business online auctions: key issues for purchasing process improvement , 2000 .

[28]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  The effects of shilling on final bid prices in online auctions , 2005, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[29]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Are All E-Commerce Negotiations Auctions? , 2000, COOP.

[30]  David H. Eaton Valuing Information : Evidence from Guitar Auctions on , 2002 .

[31]  Andrew P. McAfee THE IMPACT OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION , 2002 .

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 1990, ICIS.

[33]  R DennisAlan,et al.  The adoption and use of GSS in project teams , 2003 .

[34]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications , 1997 .

[35]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Structuration Theory in Information Systems Research: Methods and Controversies , 2004 .

[36]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[37]  W. C. Perkins,et al.  Can a Negotiation Support System Help a Purchasing Manager , 1996 .

[38]  Shan Wang,et al.  Strategic Choice of Electronic Marketplace Functionalities: A Buyer-Supplier Relationship Perspective , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory , 1993 .

[40]  Eileen G. Ancman,et al.  Measuring Customer Satisfaction , 1997 .

[41]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  Deciding on the Mode of Negotiation: To Auction or Not to Auction Electronically , 2004 .

[42]  M. Sawhney Forward Thinking about Reverse Auctions , 2003 .

[43]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Winner Determination Algorithms for Electronic Auctions: A Framework Design , 2002, EC-Web.

[44]  William C. Perkins,et al.  An empirical study of the efficacy of a computerized negotiation support system (NSS) , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system , 2002, The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce.

[46]  Sandy D. Jap Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future , 2002 .

[47]  Francisco J. Arcelus,et al.  A Purchasing Framework for B2B Pricing Decisions and Risk-sharing in Supply Chains , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[48]  Larry R. Smeltzer,et al.  Electronic reverse auctions: Promises, risks and conditions for success , 2003 .

[49]  Arie Segev,et al.  Optimal Design of Internet-Based Auctions , 2001, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[50]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[51]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[52]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Emerging multiple issue e-auctions , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  S. Croom The Impact of Web-Based Procurement on the Management of Operating Resources Supply , 2000 .

[54]  E. van Heck,et al.  Buyer Commitment and Opportunism in the Online Market for it Services , 2006 .

[55]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement , 2002 .

[56]  E. Turban,et al.  Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective , 1999 .

[57]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Realizing savings from online reverse auctions , 2002 .

[58]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Coercion and reverse auctions , 2007 .

[59]  Sandy D. Jap,et al.  Leveraging Internet Technologies in B2B Relationships , 2002 .

[60]  W. C. Perkins,et al.  An empirical study of an interactive, session-oriented computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS) , 1990 .

[61]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Commentary on bReverse auctions for relationship marketersQ by Daly and Nath , 2005 .

[62]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Setting the stage for successful electronic reverse auctions , 2004 .

[63]  B. Mahadevan Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy , 2000 .

[64]  R. Rust,et al.  Customer satisfaction, customer retention, and market share , 1993 .

[65]  Donald J. Meyer,et al.  First-price common-value auctions: Bidder behavior and the "winner's curse" , 1989 .

[66]  Phillip L. Carter,et al.  The Role of Reverse Auctions in Strategic Sourcing , 2003 .

[67]  William C. Perkins,et al.  A Comparison of Audio-Conferencing and Computer Conferencing in a Dispersed Negotiation Setting: Efficiency Matters! , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[68]  C. Poirier,et al.  Supply Chain Optimization: Building the Strongest Total Business Network , 1996 .

[69]  S. Goyal,et al.  Electronic procurement and manufacturing strategic objectives , 2005 .

[70]  Whinston,et al.  Business Models for Internet Based E-Commerce , 2000 .

[71]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Designing Electronic Auctions: An Internet-Based Hybrid Procedure Combining Aspects of Negotiations and Auctions , 2001, Electron. Commer. Res..

[72]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study , 1987 .