Cognitive and motivational frameworks in U.S. research on participation: A meta-analysis of primary effects

In this paper we classify 86 published studies of participation conducted in the U.S. according to whether they are based on cognitive or motivational conceptual frameworks, then conduct a meta-analysis of 124 correlation coefficients obtained from them to determine whether distinguishing between conceptual frameworks portends differences in the findings of U.S. research on the effects of participatory processes on performance and satisfaction. Results reveal noticeable differences in the findings of participation–satisfaction research, but also indicate that these differences diminish substantially upon elimination of research based on single-source self-reports. If interpreted as evidence of percept–percept inflation, these findings are wholly consistent with those of other recent analyses. If interpreted as evidence of the greater accuracy of self-report measures of intra-psychic phenomena, they suggest that research on the relationship between participation and satisfaction has been influenced by the conceptual frameworks used to design studies and formulate conclusions. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look , 1979 .

[2]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. , 1989 .

[3]  Paul E. Spector Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[4]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study , 1994 .

[5]  B. G. Fiman AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SUPERVISORY ATTITUDES, BEHAVIORS, AND OUTPUTS: AN EXAMINATION OF McGREGOR'S THEORY Y , 1973 .

[6]  J. French,et al.  Overcoming Resistance to Change , 1948 .

[7]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. , 1987 .

[8]  Beth Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Occupational Safety:: Assessing the Impact of Adding Assigned or Participative Goal-Setting , 1985 .

[9]  A. Rafaeli QUALITY CIRCLES AND EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES , 1985 .

[10]  The Effect of the Interaction of Leader Behavior and Subordinate Authoritarianism. , 1973 .

[11]  N. C. Morse,et al.  The experimental change of a major organizational variable. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  Robert A. Ruh,et al.  Job involvement, participation in decision making, personal background and job behavior , 1973 .

[13]  M. E. Shaw Some effects of unequal distribution of information upon group performance in various communication nets. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  H. Scheffé Practical Solutions of the Behrens-Fisher Problem , 1970 .

[15]  The Creative Organization: An Empirical Investigation Of The Importance of Participation In Decision-Making , 1990 .

[16]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Participation, Satisfaction, and Productivity: A Meta-Analytic Review , 1986 .

[17]  W. M. Fox Group Reaction to Two Types of Conference Leadership , 1957 .

[18]  Shelley A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Locus of Knowledge as a Determinant of the Effects of Participation on Performance, Affect, and Perceptions , 1995 .

[19]  L. Berkowitz Sharing leadership in small, decision-making groups. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  R. Gooding,et al.  Effects of Societal Trends on Participation Research. , 1987 .

[21]  C. H. Castore,et al.  Determinants of support for group decisions , 1978 .

[22]  N. Maier An Experimental Test of the Effect of Training on Discussion Leadership , 1953 .

[23]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  Quality Circle Problem Solving and Common Cents: Evaluation Study Findings from a United States Federal Mint , 1990 .

[24]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[25]  Kenneth E. Runyon,et al.  Some interactions between personality variables and management styles. , 1973 .

[26]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[27]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[28]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[29]  N. Schmitt Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement , 1994 .

[30]  J. K. White,et al.  Job Involvement, Values, Personal Background, Participation in Decision Making, and Job Attitudes , 1975 .

[31]  R. Schuler A Role and Expectancy Perception Model of Participation in Decision Making , 1980 .

[32]  Kim Buch Quality circles in a unionized setting: Their effect on grievance rates , 1991 .

[33]  W. Haythorn,et al.  The effects of varying combinations of authoritarian and equalitarian leaders and followers. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[34]  J. A. Alutto,et al.  Characteristics of decisional participation by nurses. , 1977, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[35]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[36]  J. K. White,et al.  Effects of Personal Values on the Relationship Between Participation and Job Attitudes. , 1973 .

[37]  M. E. Shaw,et al.  A comparison of two types of leadership in various communication nets. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[38]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  Participation and the Appraisal System , 1966 .

[39]  Victor H. Vroom,et al.  Decision-Making as a Social Process: Normative and Descriptive Models of Leader Behavior. , 1974 .

[40]  D. Kipnis The effects of leadership style and leadership power upon the inducement of an attitude change. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[41]  Henry L. Tosi A REEXAMINATION OF PERSONALITY AS A DETERMINANT OF THE EFFECTS OF PARTICIPATION , 1970 .

[42]  Martin M. Greller,et al.  The Nature of Subordinate Participation in the Appraisal Interview , 1978 .

[43]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[44]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  Effects of Perceived Decision-Making Influence on Labor Relations and Organizational Outcomes , 1992 .

[45]  Kim Buch,et al.  The Effects of Quality Circles on Performance and Promotions , 1990 .

[46]  GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING UNDER TWO TYPES OF EXECUTIVE STRUCTURE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[47]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[48]  Henry L. Tosi Organization Stress as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Influence and Role Response , 1971 .

[49]  G. Yukl,et al.  Subordinate personality as a moderator of the effects of participation in three types of appraisal interviews. , 1973 .

[50]  George S. Howard,et al.  Why do people say nasty things about self-reports? , 1994 .

[51]  E. Torrance Methods of conducting critiques of group problem-solving performance. , 1953 .

[52]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates” , 1939 .

[53]  A. A. Abdel-Halim Effects of Task and Personality Characteristics on Subordinate Responses to Participative Decision Making1 , 1983 .

[54]  A. Nurick Participation in Organizational Change: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1982 .

[55]  Paul E. Spector A Consideration of the Validity and Meaning of Self-Report Measures of Job Conditions , 1992 .

[56]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .