Repeated measurement of the attention components of patients with multiple sclerosis using the Attention Network Test-Interaction (ANT-I): Stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability

The Attention Network Test (ANT) assesses the networks of attention (alerting, orienting, and executive control). The utility of measuring attention network performances with the repeated administration of the ANT in clinical populations has not yet been explored. In the present study, we administered a variant of the ANT (ANT-I) to 11 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 11 controls over six monthly sessions to examine the stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability of the ANT-I. Participants responded through button presses to indicate the direction of a target arrow presented either above or below a fixation cross. The target was accompanied by distracting arrows, pointing either in the same or opposite direction of the target arrow. Target arrows were preceded in some trials by alerting auditory signals and/or by uninformative visual cues. Network scores were calculated using orthogonal subtractions of performance under selected conditions. The MS patients were slower than the controls, though group differences in network performance were rare. Even after five test sessions, the network scores remained stable, despite some practice effects that were the largest under conditions that tested the executive network. The reliabilities of the orienting and executive network effects were good in both groups and increased across sessions, especially with the MS patients. The alerting network was the least reliable, especially for MS patients, but it also became more reliable across sessions. The results suggest that the ANT-I can be used to measure the integrity of attention networks for MS patients in applications that require repeated testing.

[1]  Nigel V. Marsh,et al.  Neuropsychological Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis , 1998, Neuropsychology Review.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  J. Fisk,et al.  Assessment of cognitive function in systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis by computerized neuropsychological tests. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  Emily Snook,et al.  Cognitive impairments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[5]  P. O'Connor The Use of Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis - by the Canadian Network of MS Clinics , 2008, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[6]  Pío Tudela,et al.  Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control networks , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Frauke Zipp,et al.  Attention Network Test reveals alerting network dysfunction in multiple sclerosis , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[8]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Is Speed of Processing or Working Memory the Primary Information Processing Deficit in Multiple Sclerosis? , 2004, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[9]  Yee Lee Shing,et al.  Aging Neuroscience , 2022 .

[10]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  A comprehensive review of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[11]  D. Gronwall Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  M. Ferreira Cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. , 2010, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[13]  R. Klein,et al.  Repeated measurement of the components of attention using two versions of the Attention Network Test (ANT): Stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[15]  Nathalie Vizueta,et al.  Attentional mechanisms of borderline personality disorder , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Juan Lupiáñez,et al.  The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Development of attentional networks in childhood , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[20]  M. Freedman,et al.  Tests of information processing speed: what do people with multiple sclerosis think about them? , 2012, International journal of MS care.

[21]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Attentional networks in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[22]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Repeated Measurement of the Components of Attention of Older Adults using the Two Versions of the Attention Network Test: Stability, Isolability, Robustness, and Reliability , 2011, Front. Ag. Neurosci..

[23]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[24]  S. Reingold,et al.  The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[25]  S. Ludwin,et al.  The Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis: Relating Human Pathology to Experimental Studies , 2006, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[26]  L. Julian Cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. , 2011, Neurologic clinics.

[27]  J. Fisk,et al.  Limitations of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test as a measure of working memory in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2001, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Are Individual Differences in Absentmindedness Correlated with Individual Differences in Attention , 2009 .

[29]  D. Langdon Cognition in multiple sclerosis. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.