Generalized Joint Probability Density Function Formulation inTurbulent Combustion using DeepONet

Joint probability density function (PDF)-based models in turbulent combustion provide direct closure for turbulence-chemistry interactions. The joint PDFs capture the turbulent flame dynamics at different spatial locations and hence it is crucial to represent them accurately. The joint PDFs are parameterized on the unconditional means of thermo-chemical state variables, which can be high dimensional. Thus, accurate construction of joint PDFs at various spatial locations may require an exorbitant amount of data. In a previous work, we introduced a framework that alleviated data requirements by constructing joint PDFs in a lower dimensional space using principal component analysis (PCA) in conjunction with Kernel Density Estimation (KDE). However, constructing the principal component (PC) joint PDFs is still computationally expensive as they are required to be calculated at each spatial location in the turbulent flame. In this work, we propose the concept of a generalized joint PDF model using the Deep Operator Network (DeepONet). The DeepONet is a machine learning model that is parameterized on the unconditional means of PCs at a given spatial location and discrete PC coordinates and predicts the joint probability density value for the corresponding PC coordinate. We demonstrate the accuracy and generalizability of the DeepONet on the Sandia flames, D, E and F. The DeepONet is trained based on the PC joint PDFs observed in flame E and yields excellent predictions of joint PDFs shapes at different spatial locations of flames D and F, which are not seen during training.

[1]  Hessam Mirgolbabaei,et al.  Nonlinear reduction of combustion composition space with kernel principal component analysis , 2014 .

[2]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Linear-eddy modeling of turbulent transport. II: Application to shear layer mixing , 1989 .

[3]  Hessam Mirgolbabaei,et al.  Principal component transport in turbulent combustion: A posteriori analysis , 2015 .

[4]  Tarek Echekki,et al.  A low-dimensional stochastic closure model for combustion large-eddy simulation , 2008 .

[5]  T. Echekki,et al.  A framework for data-based turbulent combustion closure: A posteriori validation , 2019 .

[6]  T. Echekki,et al.  A framework for data-based turbulent combustion closure: A priori validation , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[7]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  One-dimensional turbulence: model formulation and application to homogeneous turbulence, shear flows, and buoyant stratified flows , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  S. Pope Small scales, many species and the manifold challenges of turbulent combustion , 2013 .

[9]  Assaad R. Masri,et al.  A modified piloted burner for stabilizing turbulent flames of inhomogeneous mixtures , 2014 .

[10]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  Principal component analysis of kinetic models , 1985 .

[11]  Ray W. Grout,et al.  Deep learning for presumed probability density function models , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[12]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[13]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Hessam Mirgolbabaei,et al.  A novel principal component analysis-based acceleration scheme for LES-ODT: An a priori study , 2012 .

[15]  Opeoluwa Owoyele,et al.  Toward computationally efficient combustion DNS with complex fuels via principal component transport , 2017 .

[16]  Assaad R. Masri,et al.  Stabilization of piloted turbulent flames with inhomogeneous inlets , 2015 .

[17]  Assaad R. Masri,et al.  Local extinction and near-field structure in piloted turbulent CH4/air jet flames with inhomogeneous inlets , 2015 .

[18]  H. Mirgolbabaei,et al.  The reconstruction of thermo-chemical scalars in combustion from a reduced set of their principal components , 2015 .

[19]  Tarek Echekki,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition analysis of autoignition simulation data of nonhomogeneous hydrogen-air mixtures , 2006 .

[20]  R. Barlow,et al.  Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames , 1998 .

[21]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[22]  N. Smaoui,et al.  A nonlinear principal component analysis approach for turbulent combustion composition space , 2014 .

[23]  Alessandro Parente,et al.  Combustion modeling using principal component analysis , 2009 .

[24]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .