AMPA Receptor Binding Cleft Mutations That Alter Affinity, Efficacy, and Recovery from Desensitization

Glutamate binds to AMPA receptors within a deep cleft between two globular protein domains (domains 1 and 2). Once glutamate binds, the cleft closes, and agonist-bound structures of the isolated ligand binding core suggest that closure of the binding cleft is sufficiently complete that it essentially prevents ligand dissociation. There is also considerable evidence supporting the view that cleft closure is the initial conformational change that triggers receptor activation and desensitization, and it has been clearly demonstrated that there is a correlation between the degree of cleft closure and agonist efficacy. It is unknown, however, whether the stability of binding cleft closure also influences receptor-channel properties. The crystallographic structures indicate that closed-cleft conformations are stabilized by the formation of hydrogen bonds that involve amino acid side chains of residues in domains 1 and 2. We show here that mutations that disrupt one such cross-cleft hydrogen bond (in the AMPA receptor subunit GluR2) decrease both agonist affinity and efficacy. The same mutations also hasten recovery from desensitization. We conclude that the stability of binding cleft closure has a significant impact on AMPA receptor function and is a major determinant of the apparent affinity of agonists. The results suggest that the stability of cleft closure has been tuned so that glutamate dissociates as rapidly as possible yet remains a full agonist.

[1]  J. Howe,et al.  Effects of the Lurcher Mutation on GluR1 Desensitization and Activation Kinetics , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Mayer,et al.  Structural basis for partial agonist action at ionotropic glutamate receptors , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Mayer,et al.  Tuning activation of the AMPA-sensitive GluR2 ion channel by genetic adjustment of agonist-induced conformational changes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Howe,et al.  How AMPA Receptor Desensitization Depends on Receptor Occupancy , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Mayer,et al.  Mechanism of activation and selectivity in a ligand-gated ion channel: structural and functional studies of GluR2 and quisqualate. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[6]  K. Wada,et al.  A desensitization‐selective potentiator of AMPA‐type glutamate receptors , 2002, British journal of pharmacology.

[7]  M. Mayer,et al.  Mechanism of glutamate receptor desensitization , 2002, Nature.

[8]  D. Bowie,et al.  Functional Stoichiometry of Glutamate Receptor Desensitization , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Christian Rosenmund,et al.  Heteromeric AMPA Receptors Assemble with a Preferred Subunit Stoichiometry and Spatial Arrangement , 2001, Neuron.

[10]  T. Hughes,et al.  Subunit Interactions and AMPA Receptor Desensitization , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Y. Stern-Bach,et al.  Functional Assembly of AMPA and Kainate Receptors Is Mediated by Several Discrete Protein-Protein Interactions , 2001, Neuron.

[12]  E. Gouaux,et al.  Mechanisms for Activation and Antagonism of an AMPA-Sensitive Glutamate Receptor Crystal Structures of the GluR2 Ligand Binding Core , 2000, Neuron.

[13]  J. Howe,et al.  Concentration-dependent substate behavior of native AMPA receptors , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  K. Keinänen,et al.  Agonist-induced Isomerization in a Glutamate Receptor Ligand-binding Domain , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  H. Kijima,et al.  Regulation of Kinetic Properties of GluR2 AMPA Receptor Channels by Alternative Splicing , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Lu-Yang Wang,et al.  Heterogeneous Conductance Levels of Native AMPA Receptors , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Huganir,et al.  Control of GluR1 AMPA Receptor Function by cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Jahr,et al.  The Concentration of Synaptically Released Glutamate Outside of the Climbing Fiber–Purkinje Cell Synaptic Cleft , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Dingledine,et al.  The glutamate receptor ion channels. , 1999, Pharmacological reviews.

[20]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: The interpretation of structure‐activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptors , 1998, British journal of pharmacology.

[21]  E. Gouaux,et al.  Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate , 1998, Nature.

[22]  Christian Rosenmund,et al.  A Point Mutation in the Glutamate Binding Site Blocks Desensitization of AMPA Receptors , 1998, Neuron.

[23]  K. Keinänen,et al.  AMPA receptors and bacterial periplasmic amino acid‐binding proteins share the ionic mechanism of ligand recognition , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[24]  C F Stevens,et al.  The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. , 1998, Science.

[25]  S. Heinemann,et al.  Kainate receptors exhibit differential sensitivities to (S)-5-iodowillardiine. , 1998, Molecular pharmacology.

[26]  S. Heinemann,et al.  Identification of Amino Acid Residues that Control Functional Behavior in GluR5 and GluR6 Kainate Receptors , 1997, Neuron.

[27]  S. Cull-Candy,et al.  Single-Channel Properties of Recombinant AMPA Receptors Depend on RNA Editing, Splice Variation, and Subunit Composition , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Mayer,et al.  AMPA Receptor Flip/Flop Mutants Affecting Deactivation, Desensitization, and Modulation by Cyclothiazide, Aniracetam, and Thiocyanate , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  V. Teichberg,et al.  A Venus Flytrap Mechanism for Activation and Desensitization of α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole Propionic Acid Receptors* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Quantal components of unitary EPSCs at the mossy fibre synapse on CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampus. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  K. Nagahari,et al.  Mutations in a putative agonist binding region of the AMPA‐selective glutamate receptor channel , 1992, FEBS letters.

[32]  M. Mayer,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by drugs that reduce desensitization at AMPA/kainate receptors , 1991, Neuron.

[33]  M. Mayer,et al.  Kinetic analysis of interactions between kainate and AMPA: Evidence for activation of a single receptor in mouse hippocampal neurons , 1991, Neuron.

[34]  I. Raman,et al.  The mechanism of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptor desensitization after removal of glutamate. , 1995, Biophysical journal.