Reducing loss of image quality because of the attenuation artifact in uncorrected PET whole-body images.

UNLABELLED In whole-body PET, it is not unusual to shorten the study time by omitting the transmission scan and to ignore attenuation during reconstruction. If a transmission scan is available, many centers reconstruct the images with, but also without, attenuation correction. Although ignoring attenuation leads to an artifact in the reconstructed images, these images still provide valuable diagnostic information in oncologic applications. Several authors have reported that the attenuation artifact may actually increase the tumor-to-background ratio. In this study, we analyzed the causes of the artifact and proposed a new algorithm to reduce the adverse effects on visual image quality. METHODS We analyzed the causes of the attenuation artifact mathematically and numerically, and we examined its effect on tumor-to-background ratio and on signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, we showed that the attenuation artifact may lead to loss of image detail in conventional maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. A new maximum-likelihood algorithm allowing negative reconstruction values (NEG-ML) was derived to reduce this loss. RESULTS The attenuation artifact consists of 2 components. The first component is the well-known scaling effect: The apparent activity is reduced because attenuation decreases the fraction of detected photons. The second component is a relatively smooth negative contribution that is added to attenuated regions surrounded by activity. The second component tends to increase the tumor-to-background ratio. However, a simulation experiment shows that this increase in signal may be entirely offset by an increase in noise. The negative contribution can interfere with the nonnegativity constraint of the MLEM algorithm, leading to loss of image detail in regions of high attenuation. The new NEG-ML algorithm avoids the problem by allowing negative pixel values. The algorithm is similar to MLEM in the suppression of the streak artifact but provides more anatomic information. In our department, it is in routine clinical use for reconstruction of PET whole-body images without attenuation correction. CONCLUSION Ignoring attenuation may increase the tumor-to-background ratio, but this increase does not imply improved tumor detection. The NEG-ML algorithm reduces the adverse effect of the attenuation artifact on visual image quality.

[1]  S S Gambhir,et al.  ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Frank Natterer,et al.  Determination of tissue attenuation in emission tomography of optically dense media , 1993 .

[3]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Maximum likelihood, least squares, and penalized least squares for PET , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  M. Defrise,et al.  Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  R. Buchert,et al.  Effect of attenuation correction on lesion detectability in FDG PET of breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  S. Reske,et al.  Role of attenuation correction for fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the primary staging of malignant lymphoma , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  E. W. Marchand Derivation of the Point Spread Function from the Line Spread Function , 1964 .

[10]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 1998 .

[13]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Low-statistics reconstruction with AB-EMML , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[14]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  A dedicated ML-algorithm for non-attenuation corrected PET whole body images , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[15]  K Kubota,et al.  Lesion-to-background ratio in nonattenuation-corrected whole-body FDG PET images. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  Claude Comtat,et al.  Effects of attenuation correction on tumor detection in PET oncology , 2000 .

[19]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction of Transmission Sinograms with Low Signal to Noise Ratio , 1997 .

[20]  C. Byrne Iterative algorithms for deblurring and deconvolution with constraints , 1998 .