MRI-CT fusion to assess postbrachytherapy prostate volume and the effects of prolonged edema on dosimetry following transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ivan Yeung | G. Lockwood | I. Yeung | T. Williams | M. Mclean | J. Crook | Juanita Crook | Gina Lockwood | Michael McLean | Theresa Williams
[1] R Nath,et al. The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants. , 1999, Medical physics.
[2] Dan Ash,et al. Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[3] L. Potters,et al. A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[4] G S Merrick,et al. Influence of prophylactic dexamethasone on edema following prostate brachytherapy. , 2000, Techniques in urology.
[5] C. Catton,et al. Factors influencing risk of acute urinary retention after TRUS-guided permanent prostate seed implantation. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[6] P. Grimm,et al. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[7] E Bellon,et al. The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[8] G. Glasgow,et al. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[9] A. Tewari,et al. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia , 1996, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.
[10] N. Yue,et al. Dosimetric effects of edema in permanent prostate seed implants: a rigorous solution. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[11] W. Butler,et al. Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. , 2000, Medical physics.
[12] Nelson N. Stone,et al. Postimplant dosimetry for (125)I prostate implants: definitions and factors affecting outcome. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[13] W. Lee,et al. The role of androgen deprivation therapy combined with prostate brachytherapy. , 2002, Urology.
[14] Zhe Chen,et al. Edema-induced increase in tumour cell survival for 125I and 103Pd prostate permanent seed implants--a bio-mathematical model. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.
[15] Evaluation of post-plan dosimetry using TRUS and CT after transperineal prostate seed implant. , 2002, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
[16] N. Yue,et al. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition. , 1998, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.
[17] R. Stock,et al. Importance of post-implant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2002, European urology.
[18] M. Johnston,et al. Systematic overview of the evidence for brachytherapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[19] P. Arger,et al. The effect of androgen deprivation on the early changes in prostate volume following transperineal ultrasound guided interstitial therapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[20] J J Prete,et al. Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[21] W Cavanagh,et al. Comparability of CT-based and TRUS-based prostate volumes. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[22] L. Anderson,et al. Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43 , 1995 .
[23] J J Prete,et al. Source localization following permanent transperineal prostate interstitial brachytherapy using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[24] R. Stock,et al. A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[25] P L Roberson,et al. Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[26] J. Battermann,et al. Biologically effective dose for permanent prostate brachytherapy taking into account postimplant edema. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[27] Ivan Yeung,et al. Interobserver variation in postimplant computed tomography contouring affects quality assessment of prostate brachytherapy. , 2002, Brachytherapy.
[28] W. Butler,et al. Potential role of various dosimetric quality indicators in prostate brachytherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[29] S Nag,et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[30] W. Butler,et al. The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[31] R Nath,et al. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[32] Benjamin R. Lee,et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? , 2002, Urology.
[33] I. Hsu,et al. Prostate volume change after radioactive seed implantation: possible benefit of improved dose volume histogram with perioperative steroid. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[34] J J Prete,et al. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 1998, Radiology.
[35] J J Prete,et al. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.